Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kantilal L. Majumder

dblp:49/3442 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 33% Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 33% Virtual and augmented reality · 33%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
0.112005
Landcover classification in MRF context using Dempster-Shafer fusion for multisensor imagery · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2005
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
markov random field
0.112005
Landcover classification in MRF context using Dempster-Shafer fusion for multisensor imagery · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2005
Image and video processing
image segmentation
0.112005
Landcover classification in MRF context using Dempster-Shafer fusion for multisensor imagery · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2005
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › image classification
land cover classification
0.112005
Landcover classification in MRF context using Dempster-Shafer fusion for multisensor imagery · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2005
Virtual and augmented reality › tracking
sensor fusion
0.112005
Landcover classification in MRF context using Dempster-Shafer fusion for multisensor imagery · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

markov random field · 0.1dempster-shafer theory · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 Landcover classification in MRF context using Dempster-Shafer fusion for multisensor imagery
abstract
This work deals with multisensor data fusion to obtain landcover classification. The role of feature-level fusion using the Dempster-Shafer rule and that of data-level fusion in the MRF context is studied in this paper to obtain an optimally segmented image. Subsequently, segments are validated and classification accuracy for the test data is evaluated. Two examples of data fusion of optical images and a synthetic aperture radar image are presented, each set having been acquired on different dates. Classification accuracies of the technique proposed are compared with those of some recent techniques in literature for the same image data.
Anjan Sarkar, Anjan Banerjee, Nilanjan Banerjee, Siddhartha Brahma, B. Kartikeyan, Manab Chakraborty, Kantilal L. Majumder
IEEE Trans. Image Process.7
2002 A MRF model-based segmentation approach to classification for multispectral imagery
abstract
An unsupervised segmentation approach to classification of multispectral image is suggested here in Markov random field (MRF) frame work. This work generalizes the work of Sarkar et al. (2000) on gray value images for multispectral images and is extended for landuse classification. The essence of this approach is based on capturing intrinsic characters of tonal and textural regions of any multispectral image. The approach takes an initially oversegmented image and the original. multispectral image as the input and defines a MRF over region adjacency graph (RAG) of the initially segmented regions. Energy function minimization associated with the MRF is carried out by applying a multivariate statistical test. A cluster validation scheme is outlined after obtaining optimal segmentation. Quantitative evaluation of classification accuracy of test data for three illustrations are shown and compared with conventional maximum likelihood procedure. Comparison of the proposed methodology with a recent work of texture segmentation in the literature has also been provided. The findings of the proposed method are found to be encouraging.
Anjan Sarkar, Manoj Kumar Biswas, B. Kartikeyan, Kantilal L. Majumder, D. K. Pal
IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens.5
1995 An expert system for land cover classification
abstract
A framework to represent a broad class of problems in the analysis of remote sensing imagery is proposed, and an inference engine to tackle such problems is derived. A simple model for spectral knowledge representation is used along with a method for quantification of knowledge through an evidential approach. An automatic knowledge extraction technique is also proposed to gather knowledge from training samples. The techniques of knowledge extraction, representation and inferencing have been used to do a land cover analysis on two data sets, and the results are compared with contemporary digital techniques. It is found that the proposed approach has the advantages of avoiding commission errors, and can incorporate non-spectral and collateral knowledge, while its accuracy using only spectral knowledge is comparable with standard digital methods.>
B. Kartikeyan, Kantilal L. Majumder, A. R. Dasgupta
IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens.2