Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kantilal L. Majumder
dblp:49/3442
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 33% Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 33% Virtual and augmented reality · 33% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Landcover classification in MRF context using Dempster-Shafer fusion for multisensor imagery · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2005 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
markov random field |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Landcover classification in MRF context using Dempster-Shafer fusion for multisensor imagery · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2005 |
Image and video processing
image segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Landcover classification in MRF context using Dempster-Shafer fusion for multisensor imagery · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2005 |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › image classification
land cover classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Landcover classification in MRF context using Dempster-Shafer fusion for multisensor imagery · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2005 |
Virtual and augmented reality › tracking
sensor fusion |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Landcover classification in MRF context using Dempster-Shafer fusion for multisensor imagery · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
markov random field · 0.1dempster-shafer theory · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | Landcover classification in MRF context using Dempster-Shafer fusion for multisensor imageryabstractThis work deals with multisensor data fusion to obtain landcover classification. The role of feature-level fusion using the Dempster-Shafer rule and that of data-level fusion in the MRF context is studied in this paper to obtain an optimally segmented image. Subsequently, segments are validated and classification accuracy for the test data is evaluated. Two examples of data fusion of optical images and a synthetic aperture radar image are presented, each set having been acquired on different dates. Classification accuracies of the technique proposed are compared with those of some recent techniques in literature for the same image data. Anjan Sarkar, Anjan Banerjee, Nilanjan Banerjee, Siddhartha Brahma, B. Kartikeyan, Manab Chakraborty, Kantilal L. Majumder |
IEEE Trans. Image Process. | 7 |
| 2002 | A MRF model-based segmentation approach to classification for multispectral imageryabstractAn unsupervised segmentation approach to classification of multispectral image is suggested here in Markov random field (MRF) frame work. This work generalizes the work of Sarkar et al. (2000) on gray value images for multispectral images and is extended for landuse classification. The essence of this approach is based on capturing intrinsic characters of tonal and textural regions of any multispectral image. The approach takes an initially oversegmented image and the original. multispectral image as the input and defines a MRF over region adjacency graph (RAG) of the initially segmented regions. Energy function minimization associated with the MRF is carried out by applying a multivariate statistical test. A cluster validation scheme is outlined after obtaining optimal segmentation. Quantitative evaluation of classification accuracy of test data for three illustrations are shown and compared with conventional maximum likelihood procedure. Comparison of the proposed methodology with a recent work of texture segmentation in the literature has also been provided. The findings of the proposed method are found to be encouraging. Anjan Sarkar, Manoj Kumar Biswas, B. Kartikeyan, Kantilal L. Majumder, D. K. Pal |
IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens. | 5 |
| 1995 | An expert system for land cover classificationabstractA framework to represent a broad class of problems in the analysis of remote sensing imagery is proposed, and an inference engine to tackle such problems is derived. A simple model for spectral knowledge representation is used along with a method for quantification of knowledge through an evidential approach. An automatic knowledge extraction technique is also proposed to gather knowledge from training samples. The techniques of knowledge extraction, representation and inferencing have been used to do a land cover analysis on two data sets, and the results are compared with contemporary digital techniques. It is found that the proposed approach has the advantages of avoiding commission errors, and can incorporate non-spectral and collateral knowledge, while its accuracy using only spectral knowledge is comparable with standard digital methods.> B. Kartikeyan, Kantilal L. Majumder, A. R. Dasgupta |
IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens. | 2 |