Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ming Gai
dblp:49/3605
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Logic in computer science · 62% Automated reasoning and model checking · 38% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Logic in computer science
temporal logic |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | A Temporal Logic Specification Interface for Automata-Theoretic Finitary Control Synthesis · ICRA 2005 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
discrete event systems |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | A Temporal Logic Specification Interface for Automata-Theoretic Finitary Control Synthesis · ICRA 2005 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › discrete event systems
supervisory control |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | A Temporal Logic Specification Interface for Automata-Theoretic Finitary Control Synthesis · ICRA 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
linear temporal logic translation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | A Temporal Logic Specification Interface for Automata-Theoretic Finitary Control SynthesisabstractThis paper presents a correct and complete algorithm that translates propositional linear time temporal logic (PTL) formulae to event-based automata for finitary control synthesis. It proposes the translation algorithm as a specification interface to well-established automata-theoretic control synthesis methods for discrete-event systems (DES’s). This allows control requirements to be more easily described and understood in an expressive and readable language that temporal logic is widely recognized as. Adding such a translation interface effectively combines specifiability and readability in temporal logic with prescriptiveness and computability in automata. The former temporal logic features support specification while the latter automata features support the prescription of DES dynamics and algorithmic computations. A practical implementation of the interface has been developed, providing an enabling technology for writing more readable control specifications in PTL that it translates for finitary control synthesis in automata. A simple example illustrates the use of the proposed temporal logic interface. Practical implications of the complexity of the translation algorithm are discussed. Kiam Tian Seow, Ming Gai, Tong Lee Lim |
ICRA | 2 |