Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ming Gai

dblp:49/3605 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Logic in computer science · 62% Automated reasoning and model checking · 38%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Logic in computer science
temporal logic
0.112005
A Temporal Logic Specification Interface for Automata-Theoretic Finitary Control Synthesis · ICRA 2005
Automated reasoning and model checking
discrete event systems
0.012005
A Temporal Logic Specification Interface for Automata-Theoretic Finitary Control Synthesis · ICRA 2005
Automated reasoning and model checking › discrete event systems
supervisory control
0.012005
A Temporal Logic Specification Interface for Automata-Theoretic Finitary Control Synthesis · ICRA 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

linear temporal logic translation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 A Temporal Logic Specification Interface for Automata-Theoretic Finitary Control Synthesis
abstract
This paper presents a correct and complete algorithm that translates propositional linear time temporal logic (PTL) formulae to event-based automata for finitary control synthesis. It proposes the translation algorithm as a specification interface to well-established automata-theoretic control synthesis methods for discrete-event systems (DES’s). This allows control requirements to be more easily described and understood in an expressive and readable language that temporal logic is widely recognized as. Adding such a translation interface effectively combines specifiability and readability in temporal logic with prescriptiveness and computability in automata. The former temporal logic features support specification while the latter automata features support the prescription of DES dynamics and algorithmic computations. A practical implementation of the interface has been developed, providing an enabling technology for writing more readable control specifications in PTL that it translates for finitary control synthesis in automata. A simple example illustrates the use of the proposed temporal logic interface. Practical implications of the complexity of the translation algorithm are discussed.
Kiam Tian Seow, Ming Gai, Tong Lee Lim
ICRA2