Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

C. V. S. Rao

dblp:49/3776 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1976
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Electronic design automation · 100%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Automata and formal languages · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation
logic synthesis
0.021976
Further Comments on "Closure Partition Method for Minimizing Incomplete Sequential Machines" · IEEE Trans. Computers 1976
Minimization of Incompletely Specified Sequential Machines · IEEE Trans. Computers 1975
Electronic design automation › logic synthesis › sequential circuit optimization
sequential machine minimization
0.021976
Further Comments on "Closure Partition Method for Minimizing Incomplete Sequential Machines" · IEEE Trans. Computers 1976
Minimization of Incompletely Specified Sequential Machines · IEEE Trans. Computers 1975
Electronic design automation › logic synthesis › finite state machine synthesis
incompletely specified sequential machine
0.011975
Minimization of Incompletely Specified Sequential Machines · IEEE Trans. Computers 1975
Automata and formal languages
finite automata
0.021976
Further Comments on "Closure Partition Method for Minimizing Incomplete Sequential Machines" · IEEE Trans. Computers 1976
Minimization of Incompletely Specified Sequential Machines · IEEE Trans. Computers 1975

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

rank ordering · 0.0maximal compatibles · 0.0counterexample construction · 0.0compatible merging · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1976 Further Comments on "Closure Partition Method for Minimizing Incomplete Sequential Machines"
abstract
In the above paper1Yang has expounded a concept of supersession and has claimed that superseded compatibles can be ignored in the process of minimizing incompletely specified sequential machines (ISSM). In this correspondence, we present a counterexample whose minimal solution must include a superseded compatible and not the superseding compatible. As a consequence of this it is evident that Yang's theory lacks generality.
C. V. S. Rao, Nripendra N. Biswas
IEEE Trans. Computers1
1975 Minimization of Incompletely Specified Sequential Machines
abstract
A simple yet efficient method for the minimization of incompletely specified sequential machines (ISSM's) is proposed. Precise theorems are developed, as a consequence of which several compatibles can be deleted from consideration at the very first stage in the search for a minimal closed cover. Thus, the computational work is significantly reduced. Initial cardinality of the minimal closed cover is further reduced by a consideration of the maximal compatibles (MC's) only; as a result the method converges to the solution faster than the existing procedures. "Rank" of a compatible is defined. It is shown that ordering the compatibles, in accordance with their rank, reduces the number of comparisons to be made in the search for exclusion of compatibles. The new method is simple, systematic, and programmable. It does not involve any heuristics or intuitive procedures. For small- and medium-sized machines, it can be used for hand computation as well. For one of the illustrative examples used in this paper, 30 out of 40 compatibles can be ignored in accordance with the proposed rules and the remaining 10 compatibles only need be considered for obtaining a minimal solution.
C. V. S. Rao, Nripendra N. Biswas
IEEE Trans. Computers1