Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jamie L. Rothfeder

dblp:49/4208 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video processing
document image analysis
0.112005
A Scale Space Approach for Automatically Segmenting Words from Historical Handwritten Documents · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2005
Image and video processing
image segmentation
0.112005
A Scale Space Approach for Automatically Segmenting Words from Historical Handwritten Documents · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2005
Image and video processing › image segmentation › hierarchical segmentation › multiresolution segmentation
scale space segmentation
0.112005
A Scale Space Approach for Automatically Segmenting Words from Historical Handwritten Documents · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

scale selection · 0.1projection profiles · 0.1anisotropic laplacian filtering · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Aligning Transcripts to Automatically Segmented Handwritten Manuscripts
Jamie L. Rothfeder, R. Manmatha, Toni M. Rath
Document Analysis Systems1
2005 A Scale Space Approach for Automatically Segmenting Words from Historical Handwritten Documents
abstract
Many libraries, museums, and other organizations contain large collections of handwritten historical documents, for example, the papers of early presidents like George Washington at the Library of Congress. The first step in providing recognition/ retrieval tools is to automatically segment handwritten pages into words. State of the art segmentation techniques like the gap metrics algorithm have been mostly developed and tested on highly constrained documents like bank checks and postal addresses. There has been little work on full handwritten pages and this work has usually involved testing on clean artificial documents created for the purpose of research. Historical manuscript images, on the other hand, contain a great deal of noise and are much more challenging. Here, a novel scale space algorithm for automatically segmenting handwritten (historical) documents into words is described. First, the page is cleaned to remove margins. This is followed by a gray-level projection profile algorithm for finding lines in images. Each line image is then filtered with an anisotropic Laplacian at several scales. This procedure produces blobs which correspond to portions of characters at small scales and to words at larger scales. Crucial to the algorithm is scale selection, that is, finding the optimum scale at which blobs correspond to words. This is done by finding the maximum over scale of the extent or area of the blobs. This scale maximum is estimated using three different approaches. The blobs recovered at the optimum scale are then bounded with a rectangular box to recover the words. A postprocessing filtering step is performed to eliminate boxes of unusual size which are unlikely to correspond to words. The approach is tested on a number of different data sets and it is shown that, on 100 sampled documents from the George Washington corpus of handwritten document images, a total error rate of 17 percent is observed. The technique outperforms a state-of-the-art gap metrics word-segmentation algorithm on this collection.
R. Manmatha, Jamie L. Rothfeder
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2