EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zafer Barutçuoglu
dblp:49/6558
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › microarray data analysis
array CGH analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Aneuploidy prediction and tumor classification with heterogeneous hidden conditional random fields · Bioinform. 2009 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
cancer classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Aneuploidy prediction and tumor classification with heterogeneous hidden conditional random fields · Bioinform. 2009 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Aneuploidy prediction and tumor classification with heterogeneous hidden conditional random fields · Bioinform. 2009 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
copy number analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Aneuploidy prediction and tumor classification with heterogeneous hidden conditional random fields · Bioinform. 2009 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
boosting |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | One-Pass Boosting · NIPS 2007 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
functional genomics |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Hierarchical multi-label prediction of gene function · Bioinform. 2006 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › functional genomics
gene function prediction |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Hierarchical multi-label prediction of gene function · Bioinform. 2006 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
hierarchical multi-label classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Hierarchical multi-label prediction of gene function · Bioinform. 2006 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › knowledge representation in biology › biomedical ontology
gene ontology |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Hierarchical multi-label prediction of gene function · Bioinform. 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
l1-regularized discriminative training · 0.1hidden conditional random field · 0.1naive bayes · 0.1adaboost · 0.1support vector machine · 0.1classifier combination · 0.1bayesian framework · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | Aneuploidy prediction and tumor classification with heterogeneous hidden conditional random fieldsabstractMOTIVATION: The heterogeneity of cancer cannot always be recognized by tumor morphology, but may be reflected by the underlying genetic aberrations. Array comparative genome hybridization (array-CGH) methods provide high-throughput data on genetic copy numbers, but determining the clinically relevant copy number changes remains a challenge. Conventional classification methods for linking recurrent alterations to clinical outcome ignore sequential correlations in selecting relevant features. Conversely, existing sequence classification methods can only model overall copy number instability, without regard to any particular position in the genome. RESULTS: Here, we present the heterogeneous hidden conditional random field, a new integrated array-CGH analysis method for jointly classifying tumors, inferring copy numbers and identifying clinically relevant positions in recurrent alteration regions. By capturing the sequentiality as well as the locality of changes, our integrated model provides better noise reduction, and achieves more relevant gene retrieval and more accurate classification than existing methods. We provide an efficient L1-regularized discriminative training algorithm, which notably selects a small set of candidate genes most likely to be clinically relevant and driving the recurrent amplicons of importance. Our method thus provides unbiased starting points in deciding which genomic regions and which genes in particular to pursue for further examination. Our experiments on synthetic data and real genomic cancer prediction data show that our method is superior, both in prediction accuracy and relevant feature discovery, to existing methods. We also demonstrate that it can be used to generate novel biological hypotheses for breast cancer. Zafer Barutçuoglu, Edoardo M. Airoldi, Vanessa Dumeaux, Robert E. Schapire, Olga G. Troyanskaya |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2007 | One-Pass BoostingabstractThis paper studies boosting algorithms that make a single pass over a set of base classi(cid:2)ers. We (cid:2)rst analyze a one-pass algorithm in the setting of boosting with diverse base classi(cid:2)ers. Our guarantee is the same as the best proved for any boosting algo- rithm, but our one-pass algorithm is much faster than previous approaches. We next exhibit a random source of examples for which a (cid:147)picky(cid:148) variant of Ad- aBoost that skips poor base classi(cid:2)ers can outperform the standard AdaBoost al- gorithm, which uses every base classi(cid:2)er, by an exponential factor. Experiments with Reuters and synthetic data show that one-pass boosting can sub- stantially improve on the accuracy of Naive Bayes, and that picky boosting can sometimes lead to a further improvement in accuracy. Zafer Barutçuoglu, Philip M. Long, Rocco A. Servedio |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2006 | Hierarchical Shape Classification Using Bayesian AggregationabstractIn 3D shape classification scenarios with classes arranged in a hierarchy from most general to most specific, the use of an independent classifier for each class can produce predictions that are inconsistent with the parent-child relationships of the hierarchy. To be consistent, an example shape must not be assigned to a class unless it is also assigned to its parent class. This paper presents a Bayesian framework for combining multiple classifiers based on a class hierarchy. Given a set of independent classifiers for an arbitrary type of shape descriptor, we combine their possibly inconsistent predictions in our Bayesian framework to obtain the most probable consistent set of predictions. Such error correction is expected to improve accuracy on the overall classification by utilizing the structure of the hierarchy. Our experiments show that over the 170-class hierarchical Princeton Shape Benchmark using the Spherical Harmonic Descriptor (SHD) our algorithm improves the classification accuracy of the majority of classes, in comparison to independent classifiers. Our method is also more effective than straightforward heuristics for correcting hierarchical inconsistencies. Zafer Barutçuoglu, Christopher DeCoro |
SMI | 1 |
| 2006 | Hierarchical multi-label prediction of gene functionabstractMOTIVATION: Assigning functions for unknown genes based on diverse large-scale data is a key task in functional genomics. Previous work on gene function prediction has addressed this problem using independent classifiers for each function. However, such an approach ignores the structure of functional class taxonomies, such as the Gene Ontology (GO). Over a hierarchy of functional classes, a group of independent classifiers where each one predicts gene membership to a particular class can produce a hierarchically inconsistent set of predictions, where for a given gene a specific class may be predicted positive while its inclusive parent class is predicted negative. Taking the hierarchical structure into account resolves such inconsistencies and provides an opportunity for leveraging all classifiers in the hierarchy to achieve higher specificity of predictions. RESULTS: We developed a Bayesian framework for combining multiple classifiers based on the functional taxonomy constraints. Using a hierarchy of support vector machine (SVM) classifiers trained on multiple data types, we combined predictions in our Bayesian framework to obtain the most probable consistent set of predictions. Experiments show that over a 105-node subhierarchy of the GO, our Bayesian framework improves predictions for 93 nodes. As an additional benefit, our method also provides implicit calibration of SVM margin outputs to probabilities. Using this method, we make function predictions for multiple proteins, and experimentally confirm predictions for proteins involved in mitosis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Results for the 105 selected GO classes and predictions for 1059 unknown genes are available at: http://function.princeton.edu/genesite/ CONTACT: [email protected]. Zafer Barutçuoglu, Robert E. Schapire, Olga G. Troyanskaya |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2003 | A Comparison of Model Aggregation Methods for Regression
Zafer Barutçuoglu |
ICANN | 1 |