Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tien Huynh

dblp:49/6716 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-6455-3056ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 3 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
drug discovery
0.812024
SPARK: Harnessing Human-Centered Workflows with Biomedical Foundation Models for Drug Discovery · IJCAI 2024
Programming languages and type systems
functional programming
0.011989
Comparing Two Functional Programming Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1989
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
0.011989
Comparing Two Functional Programming Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1989

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

graph reduction · 0.0benchmarking · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 SPARK: Harnessing Human-Centered Workflows with Biomedical Foundation Models for Drug Discovery
Bum Chul Kwon, Simona Rabinovici-Cohen, Beldine Moturi, Ruth Mwaura, Kezia Wahome, Oliver Njeru, Miguel Shinyenyi, Catherine Wanjiru, Sekou L. Remy, William Ogallo, Itai Guez, Parthasarathy Suryanarayanan, Joseph A. Morrone, Shreyans Sethi, Seung-gu Kang, Tien Huynh, Kenney Ng, Diwakar Mahajan, Matan Ninio, Shervin Ayati, Efrat Hexter, Wendy D. Cornell
IJCAI16
2024 Unsupervised and supervised AI on molecular dynamics simulations reveals complex characteristics of HLA-A2-peptide immunogenicity
abstract
Immunologic recognition of peptide antigens bound to class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules is essential to both novel immunotherapeutic development and human health at large. Current methods for predicting antigen peptide immunogenicity rely primarily on simple sequence representations, which allow for some understanding of immunogenic features but provide inadequate consideration of the full scale of molecular mechanisms tied to peptide recognition. We here characterize contributions that unsupervised and supervised artificial intelligence (AI) methods can make toward understanding and predicting MHC(HLA-A2)-peptide complex immunogenicity when applied to large ensembles of molecular dynamics simulations. We first show that an unsupervised AI method allows us to identify subtle features that drive immunogenicity differences between a cancer neoantigen and its wild-type peptide counterpart. Next, we demonstrate that a supervised AI method for class I MHC(HLA-A2)-peptide complex classification significantly outperforms a sequence model on small datasets corrected for trivial sequence correlations. Furthermore, we show that both unsupervised and supervised approaches reveal determinants of immunogenicity based on time-dependent molecular fluctuations and anchor position dynamics outside the MHC binding groove. We discuss implications of these structural and dynamic immunogenicity correlates for the induction of T cell responses and therapeutic T cell receptor design.
Jeffrey K. Weber, Joseph A. Morrone, Seung-gu Kang, Leili Zhang, Lijun Lang, Diego Chowell, Chirag Krishna, Tien Huynh, Prerana Parthasarathy, Binquan Luan, Tyler J. Alban, Wendy D. Cornell, Timothy A. Chan
Briefings Bioinform.8
2010 Anchoring millions of distinct reads on the human genome within seconds
abstract
With the advent of next-generation DNA sequencing machines, there is an increasing need for the development of computational tools that can anchor accurately and expediently the millions of generated short DNA sequences (or reads) onto the genomes of target organisms. In this work, we describe 'Q-Pick', a new and efficient method for solving this problem. Q-Pick allows the rapid identification and anchoring of such reads with possible wildcards in large genomic databases, while guaranteeing completeness of results and efficiency of operation. Q-Pick requires very spartan memory and computational resources, and is trivially amenable to SIMD implementation; it can also be easily extended to handle longer reads, e.g. 75-mers or longer. Our experiments indicate that Q-Pick can anchor millions of distinct short reads against both strands of a mammalian genome in seconds, using a single-core computer processor.
Tien Huynh, Michail Vlachos, Isidore Rigoutsos
EDBT1
1995 Incremental Constraint Deletion in Systems of Linear Constraints
Tien Huynh, Kim Marriott
Inf. Process. Lett.1
1991 Practical tools for reasoning about linear constraints
Tien Huynh, Leo Joskowicz, Catherine Lassez, Jean-Louis Lassez
Fundam. Informaticae1
1990 Reasoning About Linear Constraints Using Parametric Queries
Tien Huynh, Leo Joskowicz, Catherine Lassez, Jean-Louis Lassez
FSTTCS1
1989 Comparing Two Functional Programming Systems
abstract
A technique is presented for comparing the performance of functional languages with different evaluation strategies running on different machines. A set of small benchmarks is used, and th execution times of these programs running in the functional language and in the implementation language of the functional system are compared. The ratio of these execution times measured how well the functional system used the resources of the underlying hardware and implementation language. Also two functional programming systems are described. One system is a graph reduction interpreter for lambda calculus. The other is a DEL-style intermediate instruction set architecture for FP. The benchmarks in FP and the performances of the two systems on these benchmarks are presented.>
Brent Hailpern, Tien Huynh, György E. Révész
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.2