EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Antara Ain
dblp:49/7355
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0003-3371-6518ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 5 · 4 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Electronic design automation · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › hardware verification
assertion-based verification |
0.6 | 2 | 2019 | Interpreting Local Variables in AMS Assertions During Simulation · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2019 Feature Indented Assertions for Analog and Mixed-Signal Validation · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2016 |
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test |
0.6 | 2 | 2019 | Interpreting Local Variables in AMS Assertions During Simulation · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2019 Feature Indented Assertions for Analog and Mixed-Signal Validation · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2016 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › design validation
analog/mixed-signal validation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Feature Indented Assertions for Analog and Mixed-Signal Validation · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mixed-mode simulation · 0.4interval arithmetic · 0.2dynamic feature evaluation · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Interpreting Local Variables in AMS Assertions During SimulationabstractThe support for local variables in SystemVerilog assertions significantly enhances its expressive power. Handling local variables in analog and mixed-signal (AMS) extensions of assertion languages is tricky due to the dense time interpretation of AMS assertions, and has not been adequately treated in existing literature. This paper presents an approach for interpreting local variables in AMS assertions during simulation and a tool flow that works with standard mixed-mode simulators. Antara Ain, Pallab Dasgupta |
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. | 1 |
| 2016 | Feature Indented Assertions for Analog and Mixed-Signal ValidationabstractThe acceptance criteria for analog designs are traditionally defined in terms of real-valued features defined over behavioral responses. For example, rise time, peak overshoot, and settling time are features of the response of a second-order system under a step input. Designers of analog and mixed-signal (AMS) designs typically like to see whether the relevant features lie within their specified ranges, and if so, by what margin. Assertions are capable of capturing the acceptance criteria, but they do not help in evaluating how well (or by what margin) the design satisfies the specification. We introduce the notion of Feature Indented Assertions (FIAs) for overlaying the definition of real-valued features over the syntactic fabric of AMS assertions. In this paper, we present the formal syntax and semantics of our language, FIA, and demonstrate its ability to capture a wide variety of AMS features. We present our dynamic feature evaluation tool that plugs into standard AMS simulators through Verilog Procedural Interfaces and evaluates features over simulation. At the heart of this tool, we have our interval arithmetic-based algorithm for monitoring features over continuous time and value domains. This algorithm is presented with corresponding proofs of correctness and with results over industrial testcases. Antara Ain, Antonio Anastasio Bruto da Costa, Pallab Dasgupta |
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. | 1 |
| 2013 | Post-silicon debugging of PMU integration errors using behavioral models
Antara Ain, Subhankar Mukherjee 0001, Pallab Dasgupta, Siddhartha Mukhopadhyay |
Integr. | 1 |
| 2011 | Chassis: A Platform for Verifying PMU Integration Using Autogenerated Behavioral ModelsabstractPower Management Units (PMUs) are large integrated circuits consisting of many predesigned mixed-signal components. PMU integration poses a serious verification problem considering the size of the integrated circuit and the complexity of analog simulation. In this article we present an approach for automatic generation of behavioral models for PMU components from top-down skeleton models, fitted with parameter values estimated by bottom-up parameter extraction algorithms. It is shown that replacing PMU components with these autogenerated hybrid automata-based abstract behavioral models enables significant simulation speedup (> 20X on our industrial test cases) and helps in early detection of integration errors. The article also justifies the level of accuracy in our models with respect to the goal of verifying integrated PMUs. The approach presented in this work is implemented in the form of a tool suite called Chassis. Antara Ain, Debjit Pal, Pallab Dasgupta, Siddhartha Mukhopadhyay, Rajdeep Mukhopadhyay, John Gough |
ACM Trans. Design Autom. Electr. Syst. | 1 |
| 2009 | A formal approach for specification-driven AMS behavioral model generationabstractBehavioral models for analog and mixed signal (AMS) designs are developed at various levels of abstraction, using various types of languages, to cater to a wide variety of requirements, ranging from verification, design space exploration, test generation, and application demonstration. In this paper we present a high-level formalism for capturing the AMS design intent from the specification and present techniques for automatic generation of AMS behavioral models. The proposed formalism is a language independent one, yet the design intent is modeled at a level of abstraction which enables easy translation into common modeling standards. We demonstrate the translation into VerilogA and SPICE, which are fundamentally different standards for behavioral modeling. The proposed approach is demonstrated using a family of Low Dropout Regulators (LDO) as the reference. Subhankar Mukherjee 0001, Antara Ain, Rajdeep Mukhopadhyay, Pallab Dasgupta |
DATE | 2 |