Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Eitan Halper-Stromberg

dblp:49/9445 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
genomic sequence analysis
0.212014
Visualization and probability-based scoring of structural variants within repetitive sequences · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › structural variation
structural variant detection
0.212014
Visualization and probability-based scoring of structural variants within repetitive sequences · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › structural variation
copy number variant analysis
0.112011
Performance assessment of copy number microarray platforms using a spike-in experiment · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics
0.112011
Performance assessment of copy number microarray platforms using a spike-in experiment · Bioinform. 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

visualization · 0.2probability-based scoring · 0.2spike-in experiment · 0.1sensitivity and specificity analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Visualization and probability-based scoring of structural variants within repetitive sequences
abstract
MOTIVATION: Repetitive sequences account for approximately half of the human genome. Accurately ascertaining sequences in these regions with next generation sequencers is challenging, and requires a different set of analytical techniques than for reads originating from unique sequences. Complicating the matter are repetitive regions subject to programmed rearrangements, as is the case with the antigen-binding domains in the Immunoglobulin (Ig) and T-cell receptor (TCR) loci. RESULTS: We developed a probability-based score and visualization method to aid in distinguishing true structural variants from alignment artifacts. We demonstrate the usefulness of this method in its ability to separate real structural variants from false positives generated with existing upstream analysis tools. We validated our approach using both target-capture and whole-genome experiments. Capture sequencing reads were generated from primary lymphoid tumors, cancer cell lines and an EBV-transformed lymphoblast cell line over the Ig and TCR loci. Whole-genome sequencing reads were from a lymphoblastoid cell-line. AVAILABILITY: We implement our method as an R package available at https://github.com/Eitan177/targetSeqView. Code to reproduce the figures and results are also available.
Eitan Halper-Stromberg, Jared Steranka, Kathleen H. Burns, Sarven Sabunciyan, Rafael A. Irizarry
Bioinform.1
2011 Performance assessment of copy number microarray platforms using a spike-in experiment
abstract
MOTIVATION: Changes in the copy number of chromosomal DNA segments [copy number variants (CNVs)] have been implicated in human variation, heritable diseases and cancers. Microarray-based platforms are the current established technology of choice for studies reporting these discoveries and constitute the benchmark against which emergent sequence-based approaches will be evaluated. Research that depends on CNV analysis is rapidly increasing, and systematic platform assessments that distinguish strengths and weaknesses are needed to guide informed choice. RESULTS: We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of six platforms, provided by four leading vendors, using a spike-in experiment. NimbleGen and Agilent platforms outperformed Illumina and Affymetrix in accuracy and precision of copy number dosage estimates. However, Illumina and Affymetrix algorithms that leverage single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) information make up for this disadvantage and perform well at variant detection. Overall, the NimbleGen 2.1M platform outperformed others, but only with the use of an alternative data analysis pipeline to the one offered by the manufacturer. AVAILABILITY: The data is available from http://rafalab.jhsph.edu/cnvcomp/. CONTACT: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Eitan Halper-Stromberg, Laurence Frelin, Ingo Ruczinski, Robert B. Scharpf, Chunfa Jie, Benilton S. Carvalho, Haiping Hao, Kurt N. Hetrick, Anne Jedlicka, Amanda Dziedzic, Kim Doheny, Alan F. Scott, Steve Baylin, Jonathan Pevsner, Forrest Spencer, Rafael A. Irizarry
Bioinform.1