Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Yining Zheng

dblp:50/10296 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Language models and text generation · 49% Trustworthy machine learning · 14% Learning paradigms · 14%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
overfitting mitigation
0.912025
How to Mitigate Overfitting in Weak-to-strong Generalization? · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › alignment
super-alignment
0.912025
How to Mitigate Overfitting in Weak-to-strong Generalization? · ACL (1) 2025
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
weakly supervised learning
0.912025
How to Mitigate Overfitting in Weak-to-strong Generalization? · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › alignment › scalable oversight
weak-to-strong generalization
0.912025
How to Mitigate Overfitting in Weak-to-strong Generalization? · ACL (1) 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism
0.512021
Text information aggregation with centrality attention · Sci. China Inf. Sci. 2021
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
document summarization
0.412020
Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Extractive Document Summarization · ACL 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
extractive summarization
0.412020
Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Extractive Document Summarization · ACL 2020
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.412020
Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Extractive Document Summarization · ACL 2020
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
heterogeneous graph neural network
0.412020
Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Extractive Document Summarization · ACL 2020
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction › document-level relation extraction
cross-sentence relation extraction
0.112020
Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Extractive Document Summarization · ACL 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

two-stage framework · 0.9label filtering · 0.9graph neural network · 0.5centrality attention · 0.5heterogeneous graph neural network · 0.4graph-based neural network · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Zero-RAG: towards retrieval-augmented generation with zero redundant knowledge
Junqi Dai, Yining Zheng, Xipeng Qiu
Frontiers Comput. Sci.5
2026 Investigating effective LLM-based in-context tool use: what matters and how to improve
Yining Zheng, Haiyang Wei, Linqi Yin, Yunke Zhang, Chengguo Xu, Hetao Cui, Tianxiang Sun, Xipeng Qiu
Frontiers Comput. Sci.1
2025 How to Mitigate Overfitting in Weak-to-strong Generalization?
abstract
Aligning powerful AI models on tasks that surpass human evaluation capabilities is the central problem of superalignment. To address this problem, weak-to-strong generalization aims to elicit the capabilities of strong models through weak supervisors and ensure that the behavior of strong models aligns with the intentions of weak supervisors without unsafe behaviors such as deception. Although weak-to-strong generalization exhibiting certain generalization capabilities, strong models exhibit significant overfitting in weak-to-strong generalization: Due to the strong fit ability of strong models, erroneous labels from weak supervisors may lead to overfitting in strong models. In addition, simply filtering out incorrect labels may lead to a degeneration in question quality, resulting in a weak generalization ability of strong models on hard questions. To mitigate overfitting in weak-to-strong generalization, we propose a two-stage framework that simultaneously improves the quality of supervision signals and the quality of input questions. Experimental results in three series of large language models and two mathematical benchmarks demonstrate that our framework significantly improves PGR (Performance Gap Recovered) compared to naive weak-to-strong generalization, even achieving up to 100% PGR on some models.
Junhao Shi, Qinyuan Cheng, Zhaoye Fei, Yining Zheng, Qipeng Guo, Xipeng Qiu
ACL (1)4
2025 Perceive the Passage of Time: A Systematic Evaluation of Large Language Model in Temporal Relativity
abstract
Temporal perception is crucial for Large Language Models(LLMs) to effectively understand the world. However, current benchmarks primarily focus on temporal reasoning, falling short in understanding the temporal characteristics involving temporal perception, particularly in understanding temporal relativity. In this paper, we introduce TempBench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate the temporal-relative ability of LLMs. TempBench encompasses 4 distinct scenarios: Physiology, Psychology, Cognition and Mixture. We conduct an extensive experiments on GPT-4, a series of Llama and other popular LLMs. The experiment results demonstrate a significant performance gap between LLMs and humans in temporal-relative capability. Furthermore, the error types of temporal-relative ability in LLMs are proposed to thoroughly analyze the impact of multiple aspects and emphasize the associated challenges. We anticipate that TempBench will drive further advancements in enhancing the temporal-perceiving capabilities of L
Yining Zheng, Qinyuan Cheng, Xipeng Qiu
COLING2
2021 Text information aggregation with centrality attention
Jingjing Gong, Hang Yan 0001, Yining Zheng, Qipeng Guo, Xipeng Qiu, Xuanjing Huang 0001
Sci. China Inf. Sci.3
2020 Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Extractive Document Summarization
abstract
As a crucial step in extractive document summarization, learning cross-sentence relations has been explored by a plethora of approaches.An intuitive way is to put them in the graphbased neural network, which has a more complex structure for capturing inter-sentence relationships.In this paper, we present a heterogeneous graph-based neural network for extractive summarization (HETERSUMGRAPH), which contains semantic nodes of different granularity levels apart from sentences.These additional nodes act as the intermediary between sentences and enrich the cross-sentence relations.Besides, our graph structure is flexible in natural extension from a singledocument setting to multi-document via introducing document nodes.To our knowledge, we are the first one to introduce different types of nodes into graph-based neural networks for extractive document summarization and perform a comprehensive qualitative analysis to investigate their benefits.The code will be released on Github 1 .
Danqing Wang, Pengfei Liu 0003, Yining Zheng, Xipeng Qiu, Xuanjing Huang 0001
ACL3