Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexander Wyatt

dblp:50/11192 · also Alexander W. Wyatt · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
0000-0003-2399-0329ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics
0.422017
SiNVICT: ultra-sensitive detection of single nucleotide variants and indels in circulating tumour DNA · Bioinform. 2017
Discovery of Complex Genomic Rearrangements in Cancer Using High-Throughput Sequencing · RECOMB 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
computational genomics
0.422016
Clonality Inference from Single Tumor Samples Using Low Coverage Sequence Data · RECOMB 2016
Discovery of Complex Genomic Rearrangements in Cancer Using High-Throughput Sequencing · RECOMB 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence variation analysis
indel detection
0.312017
SiNVICT: ultra-sensitive detection of single nucleotide variants and indels in circulating tumour DNA · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence analysis
0.312017
SiNVICT: ultra-sensitive detection of single nucleotide variants and indels in circulating tumour DNA · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence variation analysis
single nucleotide variant detection
0.312017
SiNVICT: ultra-sensitive detection of single nucleotide variants and indels in circulating tumour DNA · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
variant calling
0.312017
SiNVICT: ultra-sensitive detection of single nucleotide variants and indels in circulating tumour DNA · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
tumor heterogeneity
0.212016
Clonality Inference from Single Tumor Samples Using Low Coverage Sequence Data · RECOMB 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › structural variation
genomic rearrangement detection
0.112012
Discovery of Complex Genomic Rearrangements in Cancer Using High-Throughput Sequencing · RECOMB 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
high-throughput sequencing data analysis
0.012012
Discovery of Complex Genomic Rearrangements in Cancer Using High-Throughput Sequencing · RECOMB 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

time-series analysis · 0.3probabilistic modeling · 0.2low-coverage sequencing · 0.2high-throughput sequencing · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 SiNVICT: ultra-sensitive detection of single nucleotide variants and indels in circulating tumour DNA
abstract
MOTIVATION: Successful development and application of precision oncology approaches require robust elucidation of the genomic landscape of a patient's cancer and, ideally, the ability to monitor therapy-induced genomic changes in the tumour in an inexpensive and minimally invasive manner. Thanks to recent advances in sequencing technologies, 'liquid biopsy', the sampling of patient's bodily fluids such as blood and urine, is considered as one of the most promising approaches to achieve this goal. In many cancer patients, and especially those with advanced metastatic disease, deep sequencing of circulating cell free DNA (cfDNA) obtained from patient's blood yields a mixture of reads originating from the normal DNA and from multiple tumour subclones-called circulating tumour DNA or ctDNA. The ctDNA/cfDNA ratio as well as the proportion of ctDNA originating from specific tumour subclones depend on multiple factors, making comprehensive detection of mutations difficult, especially at early stages of cancer. Furthermore, sensitive and accurate detection of single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and indels from cfDNA is constrained by several factors such as the sequencing errors and PCR artifacts, and mapping errors related to repeat regions within the genome. In this article, we introduce SiNVICT, a computational method that increases the sensitivity and specificity of SNV and indel detection at very low variant allele frequencies. SiNVICT has the capability to handle multiple sequencing platforms with different error properties; it minimizes false positives resulting from mapping errors and other technology specific artifacts including strand bias and low base quality at read ends. SiNVICT also has the capability to perform time-series analysis, where samples from a patient sequenced at multiple time points are jointly examined to report locations of interest where there is a possibility that certain clones were wiped out by some treatment while some subclones gained selective advantage. RESULTS: We tested SiNVICT on simulated data as well as prostate cancer cell lines and cfDNA obtained from castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. On both simulated and biological data, SiNVICT was able to detect SNVs and indels with variant allele percentages as low as 0.5%. The lowest amounts of total DNA used for the biological data where SNVs and indels could be detected with very high sensitivity were 2.5 ng on the Ion Torrent platform and 10 ng on Illumina. With increased sequencing and mapping accuracy, SiNVICT might be utilized in clinical settings, making it possible to track the progress of point mutations and indels that are associated with resistance to cancer therapies and provide patients personalized treatment. We also compared SiNVICT with other popular SNV callers such as MuTect, VarScan2 and Freebayes. Our results show that SiNVICT performs better than these tools in most cases and allows further data exploration such as time-series analysis on cfDNA sequencing data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SiNVICT is available at: https://sfu-compbio.github.io/sinvictSupplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. CONTACT: [email protected].
Can Kockan, Faraz Hach, Iman Sarrafi, Robert H. Bell, Brian McConeghy, Kevin Beja, Anne Haegert, Alexander Wyatt, Stanislav Volik, Kim N. Chi, Colin C. Collins, Süleyman Cenk Sahinalp
Bioinform.8
2016 Clonality Inference from Single Tumor Samples Using Low Coverage Sequence Data
Nilgun Donmez, Salem Malikic, Alexander Wyatt, Martin E. Gleave, Colin C. Collins, Süleyman Cenk Sahinalp
RECOMB3
2014 ShatterProof: operational detection and quantification of chromothripsis
abstract
BACKGROUND: Chromothripsis, a newly discovered type of complex genomic rearrangement, has been implicated in the evolution of several types of cancers. To date, it has been described in bone cancer, SHH-medulloblastoma and acute myeloid leukemia, amongst others, however there are still no formal or automated methods for detecting or annotating it in high throughput sequencing data. As such, findings of chromothripsis are difficult to compare and many cases likely escape detection altogether. RESULTS: We introduce ShatterProof, a software tool for detecting and quantifying chromothriptic events. ShatterProof takes structural variation calls (translocations, copy-number variations, short insertions and loss of heterozygosity) produced by any algorithm and using an operational definition of chromothripsis performs robust statistical tests to accurately predict the presence and location of chromothriptic events. Validation of our tool was conducted using clinical data sets including matched normal, prostate cancer samples in addition to the colorectal cancer and SCLC data sets used in the original description of chromothripsis. CONCLUSIONS: ShatterProof is computationally efficient, having low memory requirements and near linear computation time. This allows it to become a standard component of sequencing analysis pipelines, enabling researchers to routinely and accurately assess samples for chromothripsis. Source code and documentation can be found at http://search.cpan.org/~sgovind/Shatterproof.
Shaylan K. Govind, Amin Zia, Pablo H. Hennings-Yeomans, John D. Watson, Michael Fraser, Catalina V. Anghel, Alexander Wyatt, Theodorus H. van der Kwast, Colin C. Collins, John D. McPherson, Robert G. Bristow, Paul C. Boutros
BMC Bioinform.7
2012 Discovery of Complex Genomic Rearrangements in Cancer Using High-Throughput Sequencing
Andrew W. McPherson, Chunxiao Wu, Alexander Wyatt, Sohrab P. Shah, Colin C. Collins, Süleyman Cenk Sahinalp
RECOMB3