Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Krishna Srinivasan
dblp:50/145
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Vision and language · 32% Trustworthy machine learning · 25% Information extraction and text analysis · 19% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
3 papers |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval
evaluation |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | WikiDO: A New Benchmark Evaluating Cross-Modal Retrieval for Vision-Language Models · NeurIPS 2024 AToMiC: An Image/Text Retrieval Test Collection to Support Multimedia Content Creation · SIGIR 2023 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
cross-modal retrieval |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | WikiDO: A New Benchmark Evaluating Cross-Modal Retrieval for Vision-Language Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
out-of-distribution generalization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | WikiDO: A New Benchmark Evaluating Cross-Modal Retrieval for Vision-Language Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Information retrieval › evaluation › test collection
retrieval benchmark |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | WikiDO: A New Benchmark Evaluating Cross-Modal Retrieval for Vision-Language Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Information retrieval
cross-modal retrieval |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | AToMiC: An Image/Text Retrieval Test Collection to Support Multimedia Content Creation · SIGIR 2023 |
Information retrieval › cross-modal retrieval
image-text retrieval |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | AToMiC: An Image/Text Retrieval Test Collection to Support Multimedia Content Creation · SIGIR 2023 |
Information retrieval › evaluation › test collection
test collection construction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | AToMiC: An Image/Text Retrieval Test Collection to Support Multimedia Content Creation · SIGIR 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sequence labeling |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Transforming Sequence Tagging Into A Seq2Seq Task · EMNLP 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
structured prediction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Transforming Sequence Tagging Into A Seq2Seq Task · EMNLP 2022 |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › cross-modal retrieval
image-text retrieval |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | WIT: Wikipedia-based Image Text Dataset for Multimodal Multilingual Machine Learning · SIGIR 2021 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal understanding
multimodal document understanding |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | A Suite of Generative Tasks for Multi-Level Multimodal Webpage Understanding · EMNLP 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › pre-training
multimodal pretraining |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | WIT: Wikipedia-based Image Text Dataset for Multimodal Multilingual Machine Learning · SIGIR 2021 |
Electronic design automation › power integrity
power integrity analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | System level signal and power integrity analysis methodology for system-in-package applications · DAC 2006 |
Electronic design automation
signal integrity |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | System level signal and power integrity analysis methodology for system-in-package applications · DAC 2006 |
Integrated circuit design › packaging
system-in-package |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | System level signal and power integrity analysis methodology for system-in-package applications · DAC 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
zero-shot evaluation · 1.5vision-language model fine-tuning · 1.5vision-language pretrained transformers · 1.3pre-training · 1.0deep representation learning · 1.0seq2seq modeling · 0.6pre-trained language model · 0.6multilingual transfer learning · 0.6modeling and simulation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Entity Image and Mixed-Modal Image Retrieval DatasetsabstractDespite advances in multimodal learning, challenging benchmarks for mixed-modal image retrieval that combines visual and textual information are lacking. This paper introduces a novel benchmark to rigorously evaluate image retrieval that demands deep cross-modal contextual understanding. We present two new datasets: the Entity Image Dataset (EI), providing canonical images for Wikipedia entities, and the Mixed-Modal Image Retrieval Dataset (MMIR), derived from the WIT dataset. The MMIR benchmark features two challenging query types requiring models to ground textual descriptions in the context of provided visual entities: single entity-image queries (one entity image with descriptive text) and multi-entity-image queries (multiple entity images with relational text). We empirically validate the benchmark's utility as both a training corpus and an evaluation set for mixed-modal retrieval. The quality of both datasets is further affirmed through crowd-sourced human annotations. The datasets are accessible through the GitHub page: https://github.com/google-research-datasets/wit-retrieval. Cristian-Ioan Blaga, Paul Suganthan G. C., Sahil Dua, Krishna Srinivasan, Enrique Alfonseca, Péter Dornbach, Tom Duerig, Imed Zitouni |
LREC | 4 |
| 2024 | WikiDO: A New Benchmark Evaluating Cross-Modal Retrieval for Vision-Language ModelsabstractCross-modal (image-to-text and text-to-image) retrieval is an established task used in evaluation benchmarks to test the performance of vision-language models (VLMs). Several state-of-the-art VLMs (e.g. CLIP, BLIP-2) have achieved near-perfect performance on widely-used image-text retrieval benchmarks such as MSCOCO-Test-5K and Flickr30K-Test-1K. As a measure of out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization, prior works rely on zero-shot performance evaluated on one dataset (Flickr) using a VLM finetuned on another one (MSCOCO). We argue that such comparisons are insufficient to assess the OOD generalization capability of models due to high visual and linguistic similarity between the evaluation and finetuning datasets. To address this gap, we introduce WikiDO (drawn from Wikipedia Diversity Observatory), a novel cross-modal retrieval benchmark to assess the OOD generalization capabilities of pretrained VLMs. This consists of newly scraped 380K image-text pairs from Wikipedia with domain labels, a carefully curated, human-verified a)in-distribution (ID) test set (3K) and b) OOD test set (3K). The image-text pairs are very diverse in topics and geographical locations. We evaluate different VLMs of varying capacity on the \wikido benchmark; BLIP-2 achieves zero-shot performance of $R@1\approx66\%$ on the OOD test set, compared to $\approx$ $81\%$ on COCO and $\approx95\%$ on Flickr. When fine-tuned on WikiDO, the $R@1$ improvement is at most $\approx5\%$ on OOD instances compared to $\approx12\%$ on ID instances. We probe the VLMs with varying finetuning objectives and datasets of varying sizes to identify what aids OOD generalization the most. Our results confirm that WikiDO offers a strong cross-modal benchmark for current VLMs in specifically evaluating for OOD generalization. Our benchmark is hosted as a competition at https://kaggle.com/competitions/wikido24 with public access to dataset and code. Tankala Pavan Kalyan, Piyush Singh Pasi, Sahil Dharod, Azeem Motiwala, Preethi Jyothi, Aditi Chaudhary, Krishna Srinivasan |
NeurIPS | 7 |
| 2023 | A Suite of Generative Tasks for Multi-Level Multimodal Webpage UnderstandingabstractAndrea Burns, Krishna Srinivasan, Joshua Ainslie, Geoff Brown, Bryan Plummer, Kate Saenko, Jianmo Ni, Mandy Guo. Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2023. Andrea Burns, Krishna Srinivasan, Joshua Ainslie, Geoff Brown, Bryan A. Plummer, Kate Saenko, Jianmo Ni, Mandy Guo |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2023 | AToMiC: An Image/Text Retrieval Test Collection to Support Multimedia Content CreationabstractThis paper presents the AToMiC (Authoring Tools for Multi media Content) dataset, designed to advance research in image/text cross-modal retrieval. While vision--language pretrained transformers have led to significant improvements in retrieval effectiveness, existing research has relied on image-caption datasets that feature only simplistic image--text relationships and underspecified user models of retrieval tasks. To address the gap between these oversimplified settings and real-world applications for multimedia content creation, we introduce a new approach for building retrieval test collections. We leverage hierarchical structures and diverse domains of texts, styles, and types of images, as well as large-scale image--document associations embedded in Wikipedia. We formulate two tasks based on a realistic user model and validate our dataset through retrieval experiments using baseline models. AToMiC offers a testbed for scalable, diverse, and reproducible multimedia retrieval research. Finally, our dataset provides the basis for a dedicated track at the 2023 Text Retrieval Conference (TREC), and is publicly available at https://github.com/TREC-AToMiC/AToMiC. Jheng-Hong Yang, Carlos Eduardo Rosar Kós Lassance, Rafael S. Rezende, Krishna Srinivasan, Miriam Redi, Stéphane Clinchant, Jimmy Lin |
SIGIR | 4 |
| 2022 | Transforming Sequence Tagging Into A Seq2Seq TaskabstractPretrained, large, generative language models (LMs) have had great success in a wide range of sequence tagging and structured prediction tasks.Casting a sequence tagging task as a Seq2Seq one requires deciding the formats of the input and output sequences.However, we lack a principled understanding of the tradeoffs associated with these formats (such as the effect on model accuracy, sequence length, multilingual generalization, hallucination).In this paper, we rigorously study different formats one could use for casting input text sentences and their output labels into the input and target (i.e., output) of a Seq2Seq model.Along the way, we introduce a new format, which we show to to be both simpler and more effective.Additionally the new format demonstrates significant gains in the multilingual settings -both zero-shot transfer learning and joint training.Lastly, we find that the new format is more robust and almost completely devoid of hallucination -an issue we find common in existing formats.With well over a 1000 experiments studying 14 different formats, over 7 diverse public benchmarksincluding 3 multilingual datasets spanning 7 languages -we believe our findings provide a strong empirical basis in understanding how we should tackle sequence tagging tasks.Dataset Lang # Train # Valid # Test Token/ex Tagged span/ex % tokens tagged # Tag classes Tag Entropy mATIS en 4478 500 893 11.28 3.32 36.50 79 3. Karthik Raman 0001, Iftekhar Naim, Jiecao Chen, Kazuma Hashimoto, Kiran Yalasangi, Krishna Srinivasan |
EMNLP | 6 |
| 2021 | WIT: Wikipedia-based Image Text Dataset for Multimodal Multilingual Machine LearningabstractThe milestone improvements brought about by deep representation learning and pre-training techniques have led to large performance gains across downstream NLP, IR and Vision tasks. Multimodal modeling techniques aim to leverage large high-quality visio-linguistic datasets for learning complementary information across image and text modalities. In this paper, we introduce the Wikipedia-based Image Text (WIT) Dataset to better facilitate multimodal, multilingual learning. WIT is composed of a curated set of 37.5 million entity rich image-text examples with 11.5 million unique images across 108 Wikipedia languages. Its size enables WIT to be used as a pretraining dataset for multimodal models, as we show when applied to downstream tasks such as image-text retrieval. WIT has four main and unique advantages. First, WIT is the largest multimodal dataset by the number of image-text examples by 3x (at the time of writing). Second, WIT is massively multilingual (first of its kind) with coverage over 100+ languages (each of which has at least 12K examples) and provides cross-lingual texts for many images. Third, WIT represents a more diverse set of concepts and real world entities relative to what previous datasets cover. Lastly, WIT provides a very challenging real-world test set, as we empirically illustrate using an image-text retrieval task as an example. WIT Dataset is available for download and use via a Creative Commons license here: https://github.com/google-research-datasets/wit. Krishna Srinivasan, Karthik Raman 0001, Jiecao Chen, Michael Bendersky, Marc Najork |
SIGIR | 1 |
| 2006 | System level signal and power integrity analysis methodology for system-in-package applicationsabstractThis paper describes a methodology for performing system level signal and power integrity analyses of SiP-based systems. The paper briefly outlines some new modeling and simulation techniques that have been developed to enable the proposed methodology. Some results based on the application of this methodology on test systems are also presented. Rohan Mandrekar, Krishna Bharath, Krishna Srinivasan, Ege Engin, Madhavan Swaminathan |
DAC | 3 |