Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
John Ingraham
dblp:50/1865
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 83% Computational science and engineering · 17% | |
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 56% Deep learning architectures and training · 22% Generative modeling · 22% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure prediction |
0.8 | 2 | 2019 | The EVcouplings Python framework for coevolutionary sequence analysis · Bioinform. 2019 Learning Protein Structure with a Differentiable Simulator · ICLR 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular evolution
co-evolutionary analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | The EVcouplings Python framework for coevolutionary sequence analysis · Bioinform. 2019 |
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
differentiable simulation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Learning Protein Structure with a Differentiable Simulator · ICLR 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein design
inverse protein folding |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Generative Models for Graph-Based Protein Design · NeurIPS 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein design |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Generative Models for Graph-Based Protein Design · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
markov random field |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Variational Inference for Sparse and Undirected Models · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › graphical model estimation
sparse graphical models |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Variational Inference for Sparse and Undirected Models · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Variational Inference for Sparse and Undirected Models · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Variational Inference for Sparse and Undirected Models · ICML 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
relational language models · 0.8deep generative model · 0.8sequence alignment · 0.4direct coupling analysis · 0.4variational inference · 0.3persistent VI · 0.3fadeout reparameterization · 0.3MCMC · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Learning Protein Structure with a Differentiable Simulator
John Ingraham, Adam J. Riesselman, Chris Sander, Debora S. Marks |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2019 | Generative Models for Graph-Based Protein DesignabstractEngineered proteins offer the potential to solve many problems in biomedicine, energy, and materials science, but creating designs that succeed is difficult in practice. A significant aspect of this challenge is the complex coupling between protein sequence and 3D structure, with the task of finding a viable design often referred to as the inverse protein folding problem. We develop relational language models for protein sequences that directly condition on a graph specification of the target structure. Our approach efficiently captures the complex dependencies in proteins by focusing on those that are long-range in sequence but local in 3D space. Our framework significantly improves in both speed and robustness over conventional and deep-learning-based methods for structure-based protein sequence design, and takes a step toward rapid and targeted biomolecular design with the aid of deep generative models. John Ingraham, Vikas Garg 0001, Regina Barzilay, Tommi S. Jaakkola |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2019 | The EVcouplings Python framework for coevolutionary sequence analysisabstractSUMMARY: Coevolutionary sequence analysis has become a commonly used technique for de novo prediction of the structure and function of proteins, RNA, and protein complexes. We present the EVcouplings framework, a fully integrated open-source application and Python package for coevolutionary analysis. The framework enables generation of sequence alignments, calculation and evaluation of evolutionary couplings (ECs), and de novo prediction of structure and mutation effects. The combination of an easy to use, flexible command line interface and an underlying modular Python package makes the full power of coevolutionary analyses available to entry-level and advanced users. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/debbiemarkslab/evcouplings. Thomas A. Hopf, Anna G. Green, Benjamin Schubert, Sophia Mersmann, Charlotta Schärfe, John Ingraham, Ágnes Tóth-Petróczy, Kelly Brock, Adam J. Riesselman, Perry Palmedo, Chan Kang, Robert P. Sheridan, Eli J. Draizen, Christian Dallago, Chris Sander, Debora S. Marks |
Bioinform. | 6 |
| 2017 | Variational Inference for Sparse and Undirected ModelsabstractUndirected graphical models are applied in genomics, protein structure prediction, and neuroscience to identify sparse interactions that underlie discrete data. Although Bayesian methods for inference would be favorable in these contexts, they are rarely used because they require doubly intractable Monte Carlo sampling. Here, we develop a framework for scalable Bayesian inference of discrete undirected models based on two new methods. The first is Persistent VI, an algorithm for variational inference of discrete undirected models that avoids doubly intractable MCMC and approximations of the partition function. The second is Fadeout, a reparameterization approach for variational inference under sparsity-inducing priors that captures a posteriori correlations between parameters and hyperparameters with noncentered parameterizations. We find that, together, these methods for variational inference substantially improve learning of sparse undirected graphical models in simulated and real problems from physics and biology. John Ingraham, Debora S. Marks |
ICML | 1 |