Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dean Yasuda

dblp:50/3205 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 70% Distributed systems · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems
graph matching
0.011997
A Parallel Algorithm for Graph Matching and Its MasPar Implementation · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 1997
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel algorithms › parallel search
parallel branch-and-bound
0.011997
A Parallel Algorithm for Graph Matching and Its MasPar Implementation · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 1997
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel graph algorithms
0.011997
A Parallel Algorithm for Graph Matching and Its MasPar Implementation · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 1997
Parallel and multicore computing › data parallelism
SIMD vectorization
0.011997
A Parallel Algorithm for Graph Matching and Its MasPar Implementation · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

branch-and-bound pruning · 0.0SIMD parallel search · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1997 A Parallel Algorithm for Graph Matching and Its MasPar Implementation
abstract
Search of discrete spaces is important in combinatorial optimization. Such problems arise in artificial intelligence, computer vision, operations research, and other areas. For realistic problems, the search spaces to be processed are usually huge, necessitating long computation times, pruning heuristics, or massively parallel processing. We present an algorithm that reduces the computation time for graph matching by employing both branch-and-bound pruning of the search tree and massively-parallel search of the as-yet-unpruned portions of the space. Most research on parallel search has assumed that a multiple-instruction-stream/multiple-data-stream (MIMD) parallel computer is available. Since massively parallel stream (SIMD) computers are much less expensive than MIMD systems with equal numbers of processors, the question arises as to whether SIMD systems can efficiently handle state-space search problems. We demonstrate that the answer is yes, and in particular, that graph matching has a natural and efficient implementation on SIMD machines.
Luigi Cinque, Steven L. Tanimoto, Linda G. Shapiro, Dean Yasuda
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.5
1996 An improved algorithm for relational distance graph matching
Luigi Cinque, Dean Yasuda, Linda G. Shapiro, Steven L. Tanimoto
Pattern Recognit.2