Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Arun Shankar Iyer
dblp:50/3919
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Learning theory · 68% Trustworthy machine learning · 14% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 11% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Data integration and cleaning · 74% Machine learning and data management · 26% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Privacy-preserving Class Ratio Estimation · KDD 2016 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › distribution learning
class distribution estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Maximum Mean Discrepancy for Class Ratio Estimation: Convergence Bounds and Kernel Selection · ICML 2014 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › probability metric › integral probability metric
maximum mean discrepancy |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Maximum Mean Discrepancy for Class Ratio Estimation: Convergence Bounds and Kernel Selection · ICML 2014 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Maximum Mean Discrepancy for Class Ratio Estimation: Convergence Bounds and Kernel Selection · ICML 2014 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
accuracy estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Active Evaluation of Classifiers on Large Datasets · ICDM 2012 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification
classifier evaluation |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Active Evaluation of Classifiers on Large Datasets · ICDM 2012 |
Data integration and cleaning › data extraction
web data extraction |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Collective extraction from heterogeneous web lists · WSDM 2011 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Maximum Mean Discrepancy for Class Ratio Estimation: Convergence Bounds and Kernel Selection · ICML 2014 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel selection |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Maximum Mean Discrepancy for Class Ratio Estimation: Convergence Bounds and Kernel Selection · ICML 2014 |
Machine learning and data management
active learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Active Evaluation of Classifiers on Large Datasets · ICDM 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
learning bounds · 0.5differential privacy · 0.5stratified sampling · 0.3importance sampling · 0.3hashing · 0.3reproducing kernel hilbert space · 0.2maximum mean discrepancy · 0.2cutting plane algorithm · 0.2collective extraction · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Privacy-preserving Class Ratio EstimationabstractIn this paper we present learning models for the class ratio estimation problem, which takes as input an unlabeled set of instances and predicts the proportions of instances in the set belonging to the different classes. This problem has applications in social and commercial data analysis. Existing models for class-ratio estimation however require instance-level supervision. Whereas in domains like politics, and demography, set-level supervision is more common. We present a new method for directly estimating class-ratios using set-level supervision. Another serious limitation in applying these techniques to sensitive domains like health is data privacy. We propose a novel label privacy-preserving mechanism that is well-suited for supervised class ratio estimation and has guarantees for achieving efficient differential privacy, provided the per-class counts are large enough. We derive learning bounds for the estimation with and without privacy constraints, which lead to important insights for the data-publisher. Extensive empirical evaluation shows that our model is more accurate than existing methods and that the proposed privacy mechanism and learning model are well-suited for each other. Arun Shankar Iyer, Saketha Nath Jagarlapudi, Sunita Sarawagi |
KDD | 1 |
| 2014 | Maximum Mean Discrepancy for Class Ratio Estimation: Convergence Bounds and Kernel SelectionabstractIn recent times, many real world applications have emerged that require estimates of class ratios in an unlabeled instance collection as opposed to labels of individual instances in the collection. In this paper we investigate the use of maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) for estimating such ratios. First, we theoretically analyze the MMD-based estimates. Our analysis establishes that, under some mild conditions, the estimate is statistically consistent. More importantly, it provides an upper bound on the error in the estimate in terms of intuitive geometric quantities like class separation and data spread. Next, we use the insights obtained from the theoretical analysis, to propose a novel convex formulation that automatically learns the kernel to be employed in the MMD-based estimation. We design an efficient cutting plane algorithm for solving this formulation. Finally, we empirically compare our estimator with several existing methods, and show significantly improved performance under varying datasets, class ratios, and training sizes. Arun Shankar Iyer, Saketha Nath Jagarlapudi, Sunita Sarawagi |
ICML | 1 |
| 2012 | Active Evaluation of Classifiers on Large DatasetsabstractThe goal of this work is to estimate the accuracy of a classifier on a large unlabeled dataset based on a small labeled set and a human labeler. We seek to estimate accuracy and select instances for labeling in a loop via a continuously refined stratified sampling strategy. For stratifying data we develop a novel strategy of learning r bit hash functions to preserve similarity in accuracy values. We show that our algorithm provides better accuracy estimates than existing methods for learning distance preserving hash functions. Experiments on a wide spectrum of real datasets show that our estimates achieve between 15% and 62% relative reduction in error compared to existing approaches. We show how to perform stratified sampling on unlabeled data that is so large that in an interactive setting even a single sequential scan is impractical. We present an optimal algorithm for performing importance sampling on a static index over the data that achieves close to exact estimates while reading three orders of magnitude less data. Namit Katariya, Arun Shankar Iyer, Sunita Sarawagi |
ICDM | 2 |
| 2011 | Collective extraction from heterogeneous web listsabstractAutomatic extraction of structured records from inconsistently formatted lists on the web is challenging: different lists present disparate sets of attributes with variations in the ordering of attributes; many lists contain additional attributes and noise that can confuse the extraction process; and formatting within a list may be inconsistent due to missing attributes or manual formatting on some sites. Ashwin Machanavajjhala, Arun Shankar Iyer, Philip Bohannon, Srujana Merugu |
WSDM | 2 |