Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Shane S. Clark

dblp:50/3938 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
13ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 9 · 3 first-authorComputer networks · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
4 papers
Cyber-physical and IoT security · 60% Hardware security and side channels · 23% Systems and software security · 14%
Computer networks
3 papers
Internet of things and sensor networks · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Energy-efficient computing · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cyber-physical and IoT security › medical device security
implantable medical device security
0.332013
Design challenges for secure implantable medical devices · DAC 2012
Pacemakers and Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators: Software Radio Attacks and Zero-Power Defenses · SP 2008
Ghost Talk: Mitigating EMI Signal Injection Attacks against Analog Sensors · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2013
Hardware security and side channels › fault attacks
signal injection attacks
0.212013
Ghost Talk: Mitigating EMI Signal Injection Attacks against Analog Sensors · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2013
Cyber-physical and IoT security
embedded system security
0.112012
Design challenges for secure implantable medical devices · DAC 2012
Internet of things and sensor networks › RFID systems
computational RFID
0.122010
On the limits of effective hybrid micro-energy harvesting on mobile CRFID sensors · MobiSys 2010
CCCP: Secure Remote Storage for Computational RFIDs · USENIX Security Symposium 2009
Internet of things and sensor networks
battery-free sensing
0.112009
Hybrid-powered RFID sensor networks · SenSys 2009
Internet of things and sensor networks › RFID systems
RFID sensor networks
0.112009
Hybrid-powered RFID sensor networks · SenSys 2009
Energy-efficient computing
energy harvesting
0.112009
Hybrid-powered RFID sensor networks · SenSys 2009
Privacy and data protection › health data privacy
patient privacy
0.012008
Pacemakers and Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators: Software Radio Attacks and Zero-Power Defenses · SP 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

security principles · 0.3privacy protection · 0.3energy modeling · 0.2empirical measurement · 0.2signal contamination metric · 0.2analog shielding · 0.2cryptographic protocols · 0.1cryptographic protocol · 0.1software radio · 0.1reverse engineering · 0.1RF power harvesting · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 HYDRA: Hypothesis Driven Repair Automation
abstract
HYDRA is an automated mechanism to repair code in response to successful attacks. Given a set of malicious inputs that include the attack and a set of benign inputs that do not, along with an ability to test the victim application with these labelled inputs, HYDRA quickly provides rank ordered patches to close the exploited vulnerability. HYDRA also produces human-readable summaries of its findings and repair actions to aid the manual vulnerability mitigation process. We tested HYDRA using 8 zero-days, HYDRA produced patches that stopped the attacks in all 8 cases and preserved application functionality in 7 of the 8 cases.
Brett Benyo, Shane S. Clark, Aaron Paulos, Partha P. Pal
ARES2
2017 Adaptive Resource Management Enabling Deception (ARMED)
abstract
Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks routinely disrupt access to critical services. Mitigation of these attacks often relies on planned over-provisioning or elastic provisioning of resources, and third-party monitoring, analysis, and scrubbing of network traffic. While volumetric attacks which saturate a victim's network are most common, non-volumetric, low and slow, DDoS attacks can achieve their goals without requiring high traffic volume by targeting vulnerable network protocols or protocol implementations. Non-volumetric attacks, unlike their noisy counterparts, require more sophisticated detection mechanisms, and typically have only post-facto and targeted protocol/application mitigations. In this paper, we introduce our work under the Adaptive Resource Management Enabling Deception (ARMED) effort, which is developing a network-level approach to automatically mitigate sophisticated DDoS attacks through deception-focused adaptive maneuvering. We describe the concept, implementation, and initial evaluation of the ARMED Network Actors (ANAs) that facilitate transparent interception, sensing, analysis, and mounting of adaptive responses that can disrupt the adversary's decision process.
Partha P. Pal, Nathaniel Soule, Nate Lageman, Shane S. Clark, Marco M. Carvalho, Adrian Granados, Anthony Alves
ARES4
2017 Trusted Mission Operation - Concept and Implementation
Aaron Paulos, Partha P. Pal, Shane S. Clark, Kyle Usbeck, Patrick Hurley
RV3
2015 Empirical Evaluation of the A3 Environment: Evaluating Defenses Against Zero-Day Attacks
abstract
A3 is an execution management environment that aims to make network-facing applications and services resilient against zero-day attacks. A3 recently underwent two adversarial evaluations of its defensive capabilities. In one, A3 defended an App Store used in a Capture the Flag (CTF) tournament, and in the other, a tactically relevant network service in a red team exercise. This paper describes the A3 defensive technologies evaluated, the evaluation results, and the broader lessons learned about evaluations for technologies that seek to protect critical systems from zero-day attacks.
Shane S. Clark, Aaron Paulos, Brett Benyo, Partha P. Pal, Richard E. Schantz
ARES1
2013 Current Events: Identifying Webpages by Tapping the Electrical Outlet
Shane S. Clark, Hossen Asiful Mustafa, Benjamin Ransford, Jacob Sorber, Kevin Fu, Wenyuan Xu 0001
ESORICS1
2013 Ghost Talk: Mitigating EMI Signal Injection Attacks against Analog Sensors
abstract
Electromagnetic interference (EMI) affects circuits by inducing voltages on conductors. Analog sensing of signals on the order of a few millivolts is particularly sensitive to interference. This work (1) measures the susceptibility of analog sensor systems to signal injection attacks by intentional, low-power emission of chosen electromagnetic waveforms, and (2) proposes defense mechanisms to reduce the risks. Our experiments use specially crafted EMI at varying power and distance to measure susceptibility of sensors in implantable medical devices and consumer electronics. Results show that at distances of 1-2m, consumer electronic devices containing microphones are vulnerable to the injection of bogus audio signals. Our measurements show that in free air, intentional EMI under 10 W can inhibit pacing and induce defibrillation shocks at distances up to 1-2m on implantable cardiac electronic devices. However, with the sensing leads and medical devices immersed in a saline bath to better approximate the human body, the same experiment decreases to about 5 cm. Our defenses range from prevention with simple analog shielding to detection with a signal contamination metric based on the root mean square of waveform amplitudes. Our contribution to securing cardiac devices includes a novel defense mechanism that probes for forged pacing pulses inconsistent with the refractory period of cardiac tissue.
Denis Foo Kune, John D. Backes, Shane S. Clark, Daniel B. Kramer, Matthew R. Reynolds, Kevin Fu, Yongdae Kim, Wenyuan Xu 0001
IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy3
2012 Design challenges for secure implantable medical devices
abstract
Implantable medical devices, or IMDs, are increasingly being used to improve patients' medical outcomes. Designers of IMDs already balance safety, reliability, complexity, power consumption, and cost. However, recent research has demonstrated that designers should also consider security and data privacy to protect patients from acts of theft or malice, especially as medical technology becomes increasingly connected to other systems via wireless communications or the Internet. This survey paper summarizes recent work on IMD security. It discusses sound security principles to follow and common security pitfalls to avoid. As trends in power efficiency, sensing, wireless systems and bio-interfaces make possible new and improved IMDs, they also underscore the importance of understanding and addressing security and privacy concerns in an increasingly connected world.
Wayne P. Burleson, Shane S. Clark, Benjamin Ransford, Kevin Fu
DAC2
2012 Potentia Est Scientia: Security and Privacy Implications of Energy-Proportional Computing
Shane S. Clark, Benjamin Ransford, Kevin Fu
HotSec1
2012 Functional Privacy or Why Cookies Are Better with Milk
Robert J. Walls, Shane S. Clark, Brian Neil Levine
HotSec2
2010 On the limits of effective hybrid micro-energy harvesting on mobile CRFID sensors
abstract
Mobile sensing is difficult without power. Emerging Computational RFIDs (CRFIDs) provide both sensing and general-purpose computation without batteries--instead relying on small capacitors charged by energy harvesting. CRFIDs have small form factors and consume less energy than traditional sensor motes. However, CRFIDs have yet to see widespread use because of limited autonomy and the propensity for frequent power loss as a result of the necessarily small capacitors that serve as a microcontroller's power supply. Our results show that hybrid harvesting CRFIDs, which use an ambient energy micro-harvester, can complete a variety of useful workloads--even in an environment with little ambient energy available.
Jeremy Gummeson, Shane S. Clark, Kevin Fu, Deepak Ganesan
MobiSys2
2009 Hybrid-powered RFID sensor networks
abstract
RFID sensor networks comprising batteryless devices that are passively powered by RFID readers present exciting possibilities for ubiquitous computing applications. They require minimal maintenance, are cheap to manufacture and have small form factor. However, their lack of autonomy due to the need for constant power from an RFID reader hinders their deployment. We demonstrate that RFIDs augmented with ambient energy-harvesting capabilities may be used as a first-class sensor platform, allowing them to operate untethered from reader infrastructure. Specifically, we show that a CRFID-based accelerometer sensor can provide both real-time and delayed access to time-stamped sensor data when provided with a small amount of solar energy. The data is collected using a standard RFID reader and displayed in a graphical interface.
Shane S. Clark, Jeremy Gummeson, Kevin Fu, Deepak Ganesan
SenSys1
2009 CCCP: Secure Remote Storage for Computational RFIDs
Mastooreh Salajegheh, Shane S. Clark, Benjamin Ransford, Kevin Fu, Ari Juels
USENIX Security Symposium2
2008 Pacemakers and Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators: Software Radio Attacks and Zero-Power Defenses
abstract
Our study analyzes the security and privacy properties of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Introduced to the U.S. market in 2003, this model of ICD includes pacemaker technology and is designed to communicate wirelessly with a nearby external programmer in the 175 kHz frequency range. After partially reverse-engineering the ICD's communications protocol with an oscilloscope and a software radio, we implemented several software radio-based attacks that could compromise patient safety and patient privacy. Motivated by our desire to improve patient safety, and mindful of conventional trade-offs between security and power consumption for resource-constrained devices, we introduce three new zero-power defenses based on RF power harvesting. Two of these defenses are human-centric, bringing patients into the loop with respect to the security and privacy of their implantable medical devices (IMDs). Our contributions provide a scientific baseline for understanding the potential security and privacy risks of current and future IMDs, and introduce human-perceptible and zero-power mitigation techniques that address those risks. To the best of our knowledge, this paper is the first in our community to use general-purpose software radios to analyze and attack previously unknown radio communications protocols.
Daniel Halperin, Thomas S. Benjamin, Benjamin Ransford, Shane S. Clark, Benessa Defend, Will Morgan, Kevin Fu, Tadayoshi Kohno, William H. Maisel
SP4