Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Florian Bernauer

dblp:50/4874 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 83% Empirical software engineering · 8% Software maintenance and evolution · 8%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design
model-driven engineering
0.012000
Introducng a software modeling concept in a medium-sized company · ICSE 2000
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture
0.012000
Introducng a software modeling concept in a medium-sized company · ICSE 2000
Requirements engineering and software design
software modeling
0.012000
Introducng a software modeling concept in a medium-sized company · ICSE 2000
Software maintenance and evolution
software process improvement
0.012000
Introducng a software modeling concept in a medium-sized company · ICSE 2000
Empirical software engineering
technology transfer
0.012000
Introducng a software modeling concept in a medium-sized company · ICSE 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

quality improvement paradigm · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2000 Introducng a software modeling concept in a medium-sized company
abstract
Describes, using the Quality Improvement Paradigm (QIP), how an improvement project aimed at improving the modeling and documentation approach of a medium-sized company (Markant Su/spl uml/dwest Software und Dienstleistungs GmbH) was conducted. We discuss the new modeling approach, which may serve for other companies as a template for deriving their own adapted approach. Further, we illustrate our insights from this project that can help in future technology transfer projects. A major characteristic of this project was that it was embedded in a long-term consulting relationship.
Klaus Schmid, Ulrike Becker-Kornstaedt, Peter Knauber, Florian Bernauer
ICSE4