Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Raluca Gordân

dblp:50/5500 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-6404-6556ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 9 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
7 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics
0.612022
Transcription Factor-Centric Approach to Identify Non-recurring Putative Regulatory Drivers in Cancer · RECOMB 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
transcription factor binding
0.632017
Quantifying the Impact of Non-coding Variants on Transcription Factor-DNA Binding · RECOMB 2017
Distinguishing between Genomic Regions Bound by Paralogous Transcription Factors · RECOMB 2013
Distinguishing Direct versus Indirect Transcription Factor-DNA Interactions · RECOMB 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
regulatory genomics
0.642017
Quantifying the Impact of Non-coding Variants on Transcription Factor-DNA Binding · RECOMB 2017
Distinguishing Direct versus Indirect Transcription Factor-DNA Interactions · RECOMB 2010
A Fast, Alignment-Free, Conservation-Based Method for Transcription Factor Binding Site Discovery · RECOMB 2008
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene regulation
0.212013
Distinguishing between Genomic Regions Bound by Paralogous Transcription Factors · RECOMB 2013
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation › transcription factor binding
transcription factor binding specificity
0.212013
Stability selection for regression-based models of transcription factor-DNA binding specificity · Bioinform. 2013
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
transcription factor binding site prediction
0.112008
A Fast, Alignment-Free, Conservation-Based Method for Transcription Factor Binding Site Discovery · RECOMB 2008
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
motif discovery
0.112007
Nucleosome Occupancy Information Improves de novo Motif Discovery · RECOMB 2007
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
nucleosome occupancy
0.012007
Nucleosome Occupancy Information Improves de novo Motif Discovery · RECOMB 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

transcription factor-centric analysis · 0.6quantitative modeling · 0.3regression · 0.2position weight matrix · 0.2feature selection · 0.2statistical inference · 0.1conservation analysis · 0.1alignment-free sequence comparison · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Transcription Factor-Centric Approach to Identify Non-recurring Putative Regulatory Drivers in Cancer
Jingkang Zhao, Vincentius Martin, Raluca Gordân
RECOMB3
2017 Quantifying the Impact of Non-coding Variants on Transcription Factor-DNA Binding
Jingkang Zhao, Dongshunyi Li, Jungkyun Seo, Andrew S. Allen, Raluca Gordân
RECOMB5
2015 Nonconsensus Protein Binding to Repetitive DNA Sequence Elements Significantly Affects Eukaryotic Genomes
abstract
Recent genome-wide experiments in different eukaryotic genomes provide an unprecedented view of transcription factor (TF) binding locations and of nucleosome occupancy. These experiments revealed that a large fraction of TF binding events occur in regions where only a small number of specific TF binding sites (TFBSs) have been detected. Furthermore, in vitro protein-DNA binding measurements performed for hundreds of TFs indicate that TFs are bound with wide range of affinities to different DNA sequences that lack known consensus motifs. These observations have thus challenged the classical picture of specific protein-DNA binding and strongly suggest the existence of additional recognition mechanisms that affect protein-DNA binding preferences. We have previously demonstrated that repetitive DNA sequence elements characterized by certain symmetries statistically affect protein-DNA binding preferences. We call this binding mechanism nonconsensus protein-DNA binding in order to emphasize the point that specific consensus TFBSs do not contribute to this effect. In this paper, using the simple statistical mechanics model developed previously, we calculate the nonconsensus protein-DNA binding free energy for the entire C. elegans and D. melanogaster genomes. Using the available chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) results on TF-DNA binding preferences for ~100 TFs, we show that DNA sequences characterized by low predicted free energy of nonconsensus binding have statistically higher experimental TF occupancy and lower nucleosome occupancy than sequences characterized by high free energy of nonconsensus binding. This is in agreement with our previous analysis performed for the yeast genome. We suggest therefore that nonconsensus protein-DNA binding assists the formation of nucleosome-free regions, as TFs outcompete nucleosomes at genomic locations with enhanced nonconsensus binding. In addition, here we perform a new, large-scale analysis using in vitro TF-DNA preferences obtained from the universal protein binding microarrays (PBM) for ~90 eukaryotic TFs belonging to 22 different DNA-binding domain types. As a result of this new analysis, we conclude that nonconsensus protein-DNA binding is a widespread phenomenon that significantly affects protein-DNA binding preferences and need not require the presence of consensus (specific) TFBSs in order to achieve genome-wide TF-DNA binding specificity.
Ariel Afek, Hila Cohen 0002, Shiran Barber-Zucker, Raluca Gordân, David B. Lukatsky
PLoS Comput. Biol.4
2013 Distinguishing between Genomic Regions Bound by Paralogous Transcription Factors
Alina Munteanu, Raluca Gordân
RECOMB2
2013 Stability selection for regression-based models of transcription factor-DNA binding specificity
abstract
MOTIVATION: The DNA binding specificity of a transcription factor (TF) is typically represented using a position weight matrix model, which implicitly assumes that individual bases in a TF binding site contribute independently to the binding affinity, an assumption that does not always hold. For this reason, more complex models of binding specificity have been developed. However, these models have their own caveats: they typically have a large number of parameters, which makes them hard to learn and interpret. RESULTS: We propose novel regression-based models of TF-DNA binding specificity, trained using high resolution in vitro data from custom protein-binding microarray (PBM) experiments. Our PBMs are specifically designed to cover a large number of putative DNA binding sites for the TFs of interest (yeast TFs Cbf1 and Tye7, and human TFs c-Myc, Max and Mad2) in their native genomic context. These high-throughput quantitative data are well suited for training complex models that take into account not only independent contributions from individual bases, but also contributions from di- and trinucleotides at various positions within or near the binding sites. To ensure that our models remain interpretable, we use feature selection to identify a small number of sequence features that accurately predict TF-DNA binding specificity. To further illustrate the accuracy of our regression models, we show that even in the case of paralogous TF with highly similar position weight matrices, our new models can distinguish the specificities of individual factors. Thus, our work represents an important step toward better sequence-based models of individual TF-DNA binding specificity. AVAILABILITY: Our code is available at http://genome.duke.edu/labs/gordan/ISMB2013. The PBM data used in this article are available in the Gene Expression Omnibus under accession number GSE47026.
Fantine Mordelet, John Horton, Alexander J. Hartemink, Barbara E. Engelhardt, Raluca Gordân
Bioinform.5
2010 Distinguishing Direct versus Indirect Transcription Factor-DNA Interactions
Raluca Gordân, Alexander J. Hartemink, Martha L. Bulyk
RECOMB1
2008 A Fast, Alignment-Free, Conservation-Based Method for Transcription Factor Binding Site Discovery
Raluca Gordân, Leelavati Narlikar, Alexander J. Hartemink
RECOMB1
2007 Nucleosome Occupancy Information Improves de novo Motif Discovery
Leelavati Narlikar, Raluca Gordân, Alexander J. Hartemink
RECOMB2
2007 A Nucleosome-Guided Map of Transcription Factor Binding Sites in Yeast
abstract
Finding functional DNA binding sites of transcription factors (TFs) throughout the genome is a crucial step in understanding transcriptional regulation. Unfortunately, these binding sites are typically short and degenerate, posing a significant statistical challenge: many more matches to known TF motifs occur in the genome than are actually functional. However, information about chromatin structure may help to identify the functional sites. In particular, it has been shown that active regulatory regions are usually depleted of nucleosomes, thereby enabling TFs to bind DNA in those regions. Here, we describe a novel motif discovery algorithm that employs an informative prior over DNA sequence positions based on a discriminative view of nucleosome occupancy. When a Gibbs sampling algorithm is applied to yeast sequence-sets identified by ChIP-chip, the correct motif is found in 52% more cases with our informative prior than with the commonly used uniform prior. This is the first demonstration that nucleosome occupancy information can be used to improve motif discovery. The improvement is dramatic, even though we are using only a statistical model to predict nucleosome occupancy; we expect our results to improve further as high-resolution genome-wide experimental nucleosome occupancy data becomes increasingly available.
Leelavati Narlikar, Raluca Gordân, Alexander J. Hartemink
PLoS Comput. Biol.2