Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nicolas Y. Dano
dblp:50/5601
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
3D vision · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision
multi-view geometry |
0.1 | 2 | 2001 | Plane-based Projective Reconstruction · ICCV 2001 Reconstruction from Six-Point Sequences · CVPR 2000 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
structure from motion |
0.1 | 2 | 2001 | Plane-based Projective Reconstruction · ICCV 2001 Reconstruction from Six-Point Sequences · CVPR 2000 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction › surface reconstruction
planar surface reconstruction |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Plane-based Projective Reconstruction · ICCV 2001 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction
projective reconstruction |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Plane-based Projective Reconstruction · ICCV 2001 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
triangulation · 0.1near-optimal fundamental matrix estimation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | Plane-based Projective Reconstruction
Robert Kaucic, Richard I. Hartley, Nicolas Y. Dano |
ICCV | 3 |
| 2000 | Reconstruction from Six-Point SequencesabstractAn algorithm is given for computing projective structure from a set of six points seen in a sequence of many images. The method is based on the notion of duality between cameras and points first pointed out by Carlsson and Weinshall. The current implementation avoids the weakness inherent in previous implementations of this method in which numerical accuracy is compromised by the distortion of image point error distributions under projective transformation. It is shown in this paper that one may compute the dual fundamental matrix by minimizing a cost function giving a first-order approximation to geometric distance error in the original untransformed image measurements. This is done by a modification of a standard near-optimal method for computing the fundamental matrix. Subsequently, the error measurements are adjusted optimally to conform with exact imaging geometry by application of the triangulation method of Hartley-Sturm. Richard I. Hartley, Nicolas Y. Dano |
CVPR | 2 |