Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nicolas Y. Dano

dblp:50/5601 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
3D vision · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
multi-view geometry
0.122001
Plane-based Projective Reconstruction · ICCV 2001
Reconstruction from Six-Point Sequences · CVPR 2000
Computer vision › 3D vision
structure from motion
0.122001
Plane-based Projective Reconstruction · ICCV 2001
Reconstruction from Six-Point Sequences · CVPR 2000
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction › surface reconstruction
planar surface reconstruction
0.012001
Plane-based Projective Reconstruction · ICCV 2001
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction
projective reconstruction
0.012001
Plane-based Projective Reconstruction · ICCV 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

triangulation · 0.1near-optimal fundamental matrix estimation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2001 Plane-based Projective Reconstruction
Robert Kaucic, Richard I. Hartley, Nicolas Y. Dano
ICCV3
2000 Reconstruction from Six-Point Sequences
abstract
An algorithm is given for computing projective structure from a set of six points seen in a sequence of many images. The method is based on the notion of duality between cameras and points first pointed out by Carlsson and Weinshall. The current implementation avoids the weakness inherent in previous implementations of this method in which numerical accuracy is compromised by the distortion of image point error distributions under projective transformation. It is shown in this paper that one may compute the dual fundamental matrix by minimizing a cost function giving a first-order approximation to geometric distance error in the original untransformed image measurements. This is done by a modification of a standard near-optimal method for computing the fundamental matrix. Subsequently, the error measurements are adjusted optimally to conform with exact imaging geometry by application of the triangulation method of Hartley-Sturm.
Richard I. Hartley, Nicolas Y. Dano
CVPR2