Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

J. L. Kuhn

dblp:50/5631 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1971
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 50% Data mining · 50%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Logic in computer science · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › statistical analysis › statistical estimation
quantification
0.011971
Quantification in Query Systems · SIGIR 1971
Information retrieval
question answering
0.011971
Quantification in Query Systems · SIGIR 1971
Logic in computer science
formal semantics
0.011971
Quantification in Query Systems · SIGIR 1971
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1971 Quantification in Query Systems
abstract
Questions which involve 'all', 'every', 'some', or the indefinite article, pose some peculiar problems when presented to a computerized question-answering system where ambiguities cannot be tolerated. These problems vary from the nature of the correct answer in special cases to the very admissibility of the question itself. To deal with these problems it is convenient to divide questions into two classes---extensional questions whose answers are to name things or truth values, intensional questions whose answers are to give meanings. This paper examines extensional questions. For these, the interpretative problems arising with 'all' and 'every' can be solved by introducing a new kind of quantification, extensional universal quantification, that has the meaning of 'all F' together with a secondary meaning that the class F is not empty. Formal rules for this quantification are given, and it is shown that the so-called definite formulas (which explicate permissible queries) are closed under the new operator.
J. L. Kuhn
SIGIR1