Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Ulrich Röttcher

dblp:50/5993 · also Uli Roettcher · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1994
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation
circuit analysis
0.011994
Pattern matching and refinement hybrid approach to circuit comparison · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1994
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification
0.011994
Pattern matching and refinement hybrid approach to circuit comparison · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1994
Electronic design automation › physical verification
layout versus schematic
0.011994
Pattern matching and refinement hybrid approach to circuit comparison · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1994
Electronic design automation › physical design
net extraction
0.011994
Pattern matching and refinement hybrid approach to circuit comparison · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1994
Electronic design automation
physical design
0.011994
Pattern matching and refinement hybrid approach to circuit comparison · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1994

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pattern matching · 0.0hierarchical refinement · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1994 Pattern matching and refinement hybrid approach to circuit comparison
abstract
We present a new approach to circuit comparison which was developed to combine general applicability with most of the advantages of hierarchical processing. The basic principle of operation is the pattern matching of arbitrary subcircuits in larger circuits. Typically, a hierarchical schematic has to be compared with a flat netlist extracted from the layout. In our approach, this is accomplished by successive, bottom-up matching of schematic cells in the layout netlist, thus reconstructing the schematic hierarchy. The method is independent of circuit technology and design style. A sophisticated hierarchy handling scheme enables the usage of ill-structured schematic hierarchies. The typical problems in circuit comparison are overcome in a quite natural way by pattern matching. Real-life examples indicate the tool's suitability in function and performance. The hybrid approach is a mixture between the pattern matching approach and the traditional refinement technique. In this way, the advantages of both methods can be exploited.>
Georg Pelz, Ulrich Röttcher
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.2
1991 Circuit Comparison by Hierarchical Pattern Matching
abstract
The authors present a novel approach to circuit comparison and building-block recognition. In contrast to conventional systems, netlist pattern matching is employed as the basic principle, making it possible to identify arbitrary subcircuits in larger circuits. Typically, a hierarchical netlist derived from a schematic and a flat netlist extracted from a layout have to be compared. In the present approach, this is accomplished by the successive (bottom up) matching of the schematic cells in the layout netlist, thus restoring the schematic hierarchy. The pattern matching algorithm is embedded in a sophisticated hierarchy handling scheme, making it possible to process even ill-structured hierarchies. The method is independent of circuit technology and design style. Typical drawbacks of traditional systems such as the handling of parallel paths or the permutability of (groups of) terminals are overcome in a quite natural way. Additionally, the proposed approach offers a universal and flexible solution to the problem of functional but not too topological isomorphic subcircuits. Real-life examples prove its suitability in function and performance.>
Georg Pelz, Ulrich Röttcher
ICCAD2