Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Joel Silberman
dblp:50/6137 · also Joel A. Silberman
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 7 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 63% Emerging computing paradigms · 29% Energy-efficient computing · 5% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
machine learning accelerator |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | RaPiD: AI Accelerator for Ultra-low Precision Training and Inference · ISCA 2021 Efficient AI System Design With Cross-Layer Approximate Computing · Proc. IEEE 2020 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › machine learning accelerator
DNN training accelerator |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | RaPiD: AI Accelerator for Ultra-low Precision Training and Inference · ISCA 2021 |
Emerging computing paradigms
approximate computing |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Efficient AI System Design With Cross-Layer Approximate Computing · Proc. IEEE 2020 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
approximate computing accelerator |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Efficient AI System Design With Cross-Layer Approximate Computing · Proc. IEEE 2020 |
Emerging computing paradigms › approximate computing
cross-layer approximate computing |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Efficient AI System Design With Cross-Layer Approximate Computing · Proc. IEEE 2020 |
Energy-efficient computing › energy-efficient architecture
energy-efficient accelerator |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | RaPiD: AI Accelerator for Ultra-low Precision Training and Inference · ISCA 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural network inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Efficient AI System Design With Cross-Layer Approximate Computing · Proc. IEEE 2020 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
microprocessor design |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | "Timing closure by design, " a high frequency microprocessor design methodology · DAC 2000 |
Electronic design automation
physical design |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | "Timing closure by design, " a high frequency microprocessor design methodology · DAC 2000 |
Electronic design automation › physical design
timing optimization |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | "Timing closure by design, " a high frequency microprocessor design methodology · DAC 2000 |
Integrated circuit design › clocking
clock distribution |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | "Timing closure by design, " a high frequency microprocessor design methodology · DAC 2000 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
quantization · 0.9pruning · 0.9mixed-precision arithmetic · 0.9custom number representation · 0.9performance modeling · 0.5static timing analysis · 0.0macro placement · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | RaPiD: AI Accelerator for Ultra-low Precision Training and InferenceabstractThe growing prevalence and computational demands of Artificial Intelligence (AI) workloads has led to widespread use of hardware accelerators in their execution. Scaling the performance of AI accelerators across generations is pivotal to their success in commercial deployments. The intrinsic error-resilient nature of AI workloads present a unique opportunity for performance/energy improvement through precision scaling. Motivated by the recent algorithmic advances in precision scaling for inference and training, we designed RaPiD1, a 4-core AI accelerator chip supporting a spectrum of precisions, namely, 16 and 8-bit floating-point and 4 and 2-bit fixed-point. The 36mm2RaPiD chip fabricated in 7nm EUV technology delivers a peak 3.5 TFLOPS/W in HFP8 mode and 16.5 TOPS/W in INT4 mode at nominal voltage. Using a performance model calibrated to within 1% of the measurement results, we evaluated DNN inference using 4-bit fixed-point representation for a 4-core 1 RaPiD chip system and DNN training using 8-bit floating point representation for a 768 TFLOPs AI system comprising 4 32-core RaPiD chips. Our results show INT4 inference for batch size of 1 achieves 3 - 13.5 (average 7) TOPS/W and FP8 training for a mini-batch of 512 achieves a sustained 102 - 588 (average 203) TFLOPS across a wide range of applications. Swagath Venkataramani, Vijayalakshmi Srinivasan, Wei Wang 0333, Sanchari Sen, Ankur Agrawal, Monodeep Kar, Shubham Jain 0004, Alberto Mannari, Hoang Tran, Eri Ogawa, Kazuaki Ishizaki, Hiroshi Inoue, Marcel Schaal, Mauricio J. Serrano, Jungwook Choi, Xiao Sun 0013, Naigang Wang, Chia-Yu Chen, Allison Allain, James Bonanno, Nianzheng Cao, Robert Casatuta, Matthew Cohen, Bruce M. Fleischer, Michael Guillorn, Howard Haynie, Jinwook Jung, Mingu Kang, Kyu-Hyoun Kim, Siyu Koswatta, Sae Kyu Lee, Martin Lutz, Silvia M. Müller, Jinwook Oh, Ashish Ranjan 0001, Zhibin Ren, Scot Rider, Kerstin Schelm, Michael Scheuermann, Joel Silberman, Vidhi Zalani, Xin Zhang 0025, Ching Zhou, Matthew M. Ziegler, Vinay Shah, Moriyoshi Ohara, Pong-Fei Lu, Brian W. Curran, Sunil Shukla, Leland Chang, Kailash Gopalakrishnan |
ISCA | 42 |
| 2020 | Efficient AI System Design With Cross-Layer Approximate ComputingabstractAdvances in deep neural networks (DNNs) and the availability of massive real-world data have enabled superhuman levels of accuracy on many AI tasks and ushered the explosive growth of AI workloads across the spectrum of computing devices. However, their superior accuracy comes at a high computational cost, which necessitates approaches beyond traditional computing paradigms to improve their operational efficiency. Leveraging the application-level insight of error resilience, we demonstrate how approximate computing (AxC) can significantly boost the efficiency of AI platforms and play a pivotal role in the broader adoption of AI-based applications and services. To this end, we present RaPiD, a multi-tera operations per second (TOPS) AI hardware accelerator core (fabricated at 14-nm technology) that we built from the ground-up using AxC techniques across the stack including algorithms, architecture, programmability, and hardware. We highlight the workload-guided systematic explorations of AxC techniques for AI, including custom number representations, quantization/pruning methodologies, mixed-precision architecture design, instruction sets, and compiler technologies with quality programmability, employed in the RaPiD accelerator. Swagath Venkataramani, Xiao Sun 0013, Naigang Wang, Chia-Yu Chen, Jungwook Choi, Mingu Kang, Ankur Agarwal, Jinwook Oh, Shubham Jain 0004, Tina Babinsky, Nianzheng Cao, Thomas W. Fox, Bruce M. Fleischer, George Gristede, Michael Guillorn, Howard Haynie, Hiroshi Inoue, Kazuaki Ishizaki, Michael J. Klaiber, Shih-Hsien Lo, Gary W. Maier, Silvia M. Müller, Michael Scheuermann, Eri Ogawa, Marcel Schaal, Mauricio J. Serrano, Joel Silberman, Christos Vezyrtzis, Wei Wang 0333, Fanchieh Yee, Matthew M. Ziegler, Ching Zhou, Moriyoshi Ohara, Pong-Fei Lu, Brian W. Curran, Sunil Shukla, Vijayalakshmi Srinivasan, Leland Chang, Kailash Gopalakrishnan |
Proc. IEEE | 27 |
| 2018 | Across the Stack Opportunities for Deep Learning AccelerationabstractThe combination of growth in compute capabilities and availability of large datasets has led to a re-birth of deep learning. Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have become state-of-the-art in a variety of machine learning tasks spanning domains across vision, speech, and machine translation. Deep Learning (DL) achieves high accuracy in these tasks at the expense of 100s of ExaOps of computation; posing significant challenges to efficient large-scale deployment in both resource-constrained environments and data centers. Vijayalakshmi Srinivasan, Bruce M. Fleischer, Sunil Shukla, Matthew M. Ziegler, Joel Silberman, Jinwook Oh, Jungwook Choi, Silvia M. Müller, Ankur Agrawal, Tina Babinsky, Nianzheng Cao, Chia-Yu Chen, Pierce Chuang, Thomas W. Fox, George Gristede, Michael Guillorn, Howard Haynie, Michael J. Klaiber, Dongsoo Lee, Shih-Hsien Lo, Gary W. Maier, Michael Scheuermann, Swagath Venkataramani, Christos Vezyrtzis, Naigang Wang, Fanchieh Yee, Ching Zhou, Pong-Fei Lu, Brian W. Curran, Leland Chang, Kailash Gopalakrishnan |
ISLPED | 5 |
| 2005 | The circuit design of the synergistic processor element of a CELL processorabstractA 32b 4-way SIMD dual-issue synergistic processor element of a CELL processor is developed with 20.9 million transistors in 14.8mm/sup 2/ using a 90nm SOI technology. CMOS static gates implement the majority of the logic. Dynamic circuits are used in critical areas, occupying 19% of the nonSRAM area. ISA, microarchitecture and physical implementation are tightly coupled to achieve a compact and power efficient design. Correct operation has been observed up to 5.6GHz at 1.4V supply and 56/spl deg/C. Osamu Takahashi, Russ Cook, Scott R. Cottier, Sang H. Dhong, Brian K. Flachs, Koji Hirairi, Atsushi Kawasumi, Hiroaki Murakami, Hiromi Noro, Hwa-Joon Oh, S. Onish, Juergen Pille, Joel Silberman |
ICCAD | 13 |
| 2000 | "Timing closure by design, " a high frequency microprocessor design methodologyabstractThis paper presents a design methodology emphasizing early and quick timing closure for high frequency microprocessor designs. This methodology was used to design a Gigahertz class PowerPC microprocessor with 19 million transistors. Characteristics of “Timing Closure by Design are 1) logic partitioned on timing boundaries, 2) predictable control structures (PLAs), 3) static interfaces for dynamic circuits, 4) low skew clock distribution, 5) deterministic method of macro placement, 6) simplified timing analysis, and 7) refinement method of chip integration with early timing analysis. Stephen D. Posluszny, Naoaki Aoki, David W. Boerstler, Paula K. Coulman, Sang H. Dhong, Brian K. Flachs, H. Peter Hofstee, Nobuo Kojima, Ohsang Kwon, Kyung Tek Lee, David Meltzer, Kevin J. Nowka, J. Peter, Joel Silberman, Osamu Takahashi, Paul G. Villarrubia |
DAC | 15 |
| 1998 | Design methodology for a 1.0 GHz microprocessorabstractThis paper describes the design methodology used to build an experimental 1.0 GigaHertz PowerPC integer microprocessor at IBM's Austin Research Laboratory. The high frequency requirements dictated the chip composition to be almost entirely custom macros using dynamic circuit techniques. The methodology presented will cover design and verification tools as well as circuit constraints and microarchitecture philosophy. The microarchitecture, circuits and tools were defined by the high frequency requirements of the processor as well as the aggressive design schedule and size of the design team. Stephen D. Posluszny, Naoaki Aoki, David W. Boerstler, Jeffrey L. Burns, Sang H. Dhong, Uttam Ghoshal, H. Peter Hofstee, David P. LaPotin, Kyung Tek Lee, David Meltzer, Hung C. Ngo, Kevin J. Nowka, Joel Silberman, Osamu Takahashi, Ivan Vo |
ICCD | 13 |
| 1998 | A 690 ps read-access latency register file for a GHz integer microprocessorabstractThis paper describes a 690 ps read-access latency, 32 entry by 64 bit, 3 read-port, 2 write-port, register file with internal bypass. The register file has been fabricated as a pan of 1.0 GHz single-issue 64-bit PowerPC integer processor. Fabrication technology was IBM CMOS6X: 0.25-/spl mu/m drawn channel length, six-metal-layer (Al), 1.8 V nom. V/sub DD/. Self-resetting custom dynamic circuits are used exclusively. Read operation is accomplished by sensing the differential voltage of dual rail bit-lines. Read operation is followed by write operation in the same cycle. Whenever a read address is identical to a write address, the write data is forwarded by an output multiplexer. The register file has been tested and cycle by cycle operation in the processor environment verified at frequencies up to 1.0 GHz (1.8 V, 25/spl deg/C). Osamu Takahashi, Joel Silberman, Sang H. Dhong, H. Peter Hofstee, Naoaki Aoki |
ICCD | 2 |
| 1998 | High-Speed Serializing/De-Serializing Design-For-Test Method for Evaluating a 1 GHz MicroprocessorabstractAs microprocessor speeds approach 1 GHz and beyond the difficulties of at-speed testing continue to increase. In particular, automated test equipment which operates at these frequencies is very limited. This paper discusses a design-for-test method which serializes parallel circuit inputs and de-serializes circuit outputs to achieve 1 GHz operation on test equipment operating at frequencies below 100 MHz. This method has been used to successfully characterize the operation of a 1 GHz microprocessor chip. David F. Heidel, Sang H. Dhong, H. Peter Hofstee, Michael Immediato, Kevin J. Nowka, Joel Silberman, Kevin Stawiasz |
VTS | 6 |