Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
R. Keira Cheetham
dblp:50/8887
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics |
0.3 | 2 | 2012 | Strelka: accurate somatic small-variant calling from sequenced tumor-normal sample pairs · Bioinform. 2012 CNAseg - a novel framework for identification of copy number changes in cancer from second-generation sequencing data · Bioinform. 2010 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › somatic mutation analysis
somatic mutation detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Strelka: accurate somatic small-variant calling from sequenced tumor-normal sample pairs · Bioinform. 2012 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › copy number analysis
copy number alteration detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | CNAseg - a novel framework for identification of copy number changes in cancer from second-generation sequencing data · Bioinform. 2010 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
bayesian modeling |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Strelka: accurate somatic small-variant calling from sequenced tumor-normal sample pairs · Bioinform. 2012 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
sequencing data analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | CNAseg - a novel framework for identification of copy number changes in cancer from second-generation sequencing data · Bioinform. 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
bayesian inference · 0.1allele frequency modeling · 0.1simulation · 0.1depth-of-coverage analysis · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | Strelka: accurate somatic small-variant calling from sequenced tumor-normal sample pairsabstractMOTIVATION: Whole genome and exome sequencing of matched tumor-normal sample pairs is becoming routine in cancer research. The consequent increased demand for somatic variant analysis of paired samples requires methods specialized to model this problem so as to sensitively call variants at any practical level of tumor impurity. RESULTS: We describe Strelka, a method for somatic SNV and small indel detection from sequencing data of matched tumor-normal samples. The method uses a novel Bayesian approach which represents continuous allele frequencies for both tumor and normal samples, while leveraging the expected genotype structure of the normal. This is achieved by representing the normal sample as a mixture of germline variation with noise, and representing the tumor sample as a mixture of the normal sample with somatic variation. A natural consequence of the model structure is that sensitivity can be maintained at high tumor impurity without requiring purity estimates. We demonstrate that the method has superior accuracy and sensitivity on impure samples compared with approaches based on either diploid genotype likelihoods or general allele-frequency tests. AVAILABILITY: The Strelka workflow source code is available at ftp://[email protected]/. CONTACT: [email protected] Christopher T. Saunders, Wendy S. W. Wong, Sajani Swamy, Jennifer Becq, Lisa J. Murray, R. Keira Cheetham |
Bioinform. | 6 |
| 2010 | CNAseg - a novel framework for identification of copy number changes in cancer from second-generation sequencing dataabstractMOTIVATION: Copy number abnormalities (CNAs) represent an important type of genetic mutation that can lead to abnormal cell growth and proliferation. New high-throughput sequencing technologies promise comprehensive characterization of CNAs. In contrast to microarrays, where probe design follows a carefully developed protocol, reads represent a random sample from a library and may be prone to representation biases due to GC content and other factors. The discrimination between true and false positive CNAs becomes an important issue. RESULTS: We present a novel approach, called CNAseg, to identify CNAs from second-generation sequencing data. It uses depth of coverage to estimate copy number states and flowcell-to-flowcell variability in cancer and normal samples to control the false positive rate. We tested the method using the COLO-829 melanoma cell line sequenced to 40-fold coverage. An extensive simulation scheme was developed to recreate different scenarios of copy number changes and depth of coverage by altering a real dataset with spiked-in CNAs. Comparison to alternative approaches using both real and simulated datasets showed that CNAseg achieves superior precision and improved sensitivity estimates. AVAILABILITY: The CNAseg package and test data are available at http://www.compbio.group.cam.ac.uk/software.html. Sergii Ivakhno, Tom Royce, Anthony J. Cox, Dirk J. Evers, R. Keira Cheetham, Simon Tavaré |
Bioinform. | 5 |