Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jaeung Han

dblp:50/9894 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
High-performance computing · 36% Cloud and datacenter computing · 33% Performance modeling and evaluation · 26%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
High-performance computing › scientific computing systems
molecular dynamics simulation
0.312017
Configuration Guidance Framework for Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Virtualized Clusters · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2017
High-performance computing
scientific computing
0.312017
Configuration Guidance Framework for Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Virtualized Clusters · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2017
Cloud and datacenter computing › cluster resource management and scheduling
cluster resource management
0.212016
Interference Management for Distributed Parallel Applications in Consolidated Clusters · ASPLOS 2016
Performance modeling and evaluation › network performance analysis
interference modeling
0.212016
Interference Management for Distributed Parallel Applications in Consolidated Clusters · ASPLOS 2016
Performance modeling and evaluation › performance prediction
execution time prediction
0.112017
Configuration Guidance Framework for Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Virtualized Clusters · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2017
Performance modeling and evaluation
performance prediction
0.112017
Configuration Guidance Framework for Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Virtualized Clusters · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2017
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel computing › parallel applications
distributed parallel applications
0.112016
Interference Management for Distributed Parallel Applications in Consolidated Clusters · ASPLOS 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

performance prediction · 0.3artificial neural network · 0.3static profiling · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Configuration Guidance Framework for Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Virtualized Clusters
abstract
With the advancement of cloud computing, there has been a growing interest in exploiting demand-based cloud resources for parallel scientific applications. To satisfy different needs for computing resources, cloud providers provide many different types of virtual machines (VMs) with various numbers of computing cores and amounts of memory. The cost and execution time of a scientific application vary depending on the types of VMs, number of VMs, and current status of the cloud due to interference among VMs. However, currently, cloud users are solely responsible for selecting the most effective VM configuration for their needs, but often end up with sub-optimal selections. In this paper, using molecular dynamics simulations as a case study, we propose a framework to guide users to select the optimal VM configurations that satisfy their requirements for scientific parallel computing in virtualized clusters. For molecular dynamics computation on a cluster of VMs, the guidance framework uses artificial neural networks which are trained to predict its execution times for various inputs, VM configurations, and status of interference among VMs. Using our performance prediction mechanisms, the guidance framework helps users choose an optimal or near-optimal VM cluster configuration under cost and runtime constraints.
Jaeung Han, Changdae Kim 0001, Jaehyuk Huh 0001, Gil-Jin Jang, Young-ri Choi
IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput.1
2016 Interference Management for Distributed Parallel Applications in Consolidated Clusters
abstract
Consolidating multiple applications on a system can improve the overall resource utilization of data center systems. However, such consolidation can adversely affect the performance of some applications due to interference caused by resource contention. Despite many prior studies on the interference effects in single-node systems, the interference behaviors of distributed parallel applications have not been investigated thoroughly. With distributed applications, a local interference in a node can affect the whole execution of an application spanning many nodes. This paper studies an interference modeling methodology for distributed applications to predict their performance under interference effects in consolidated clusters. This study first characterizes the effects of interference for various distributed applications over different interference settings, and analyzes how diverse interference intensities on multiple nodes affect the overall performance. Based on the characterization, this study proposes a static profiling-based model for interference propagation and heterogeneity behaviors. In addition, this paper presents use case studies of the modeling method, two interference-aware placement techniques for consolidated virtual clusters, which attempt to maximize the overall throughput or to guarantee the quality-of-service.
Jaeung Han, Seungheun Jeon, Young-ri Choi, Jaehyuk Huh 0001
ASPLOS1