EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Daniel T. Graves
dblp:50/9990
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 3
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
High-performance computing · 62% Distributed systems · 19% Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 19% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
High-performance computing › scientific computing systems
adaptive mesh refinement |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Granularity and the cost of error recovery in resilient AMR scientific applications · SC 2016 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
error recovery |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Granularity and the cost of error recovery in resilient AMR scientific applications · SC 2016 |
Distributed systems
fault tolerance |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Granularity and the cost of error recovery in resilient AMR scientific applications · SC 2016 |
High-performance computing › fault tolerance at scale
local recovery |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Granularity and the cost of error recovery in resilient AMR scientific applications · SC 2016 |
High-performance computing
scientific computing systems |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Granularity and the cost of error recovery in resilient AMR scientific applications · SC 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
parameterization · 0.2cost modeling · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Granularity and the cost of error recovery in resilient AMR scientific applicationsabstractSupercomputing platforms are expected to have larger failure rates in the future because of scaling and power concerns. The memory and performance impact may vary with error types and failure modes. Therefore, localized recovery schemes will be important for scientific computations, including failure modes where application intervention is suitable for recovery. We present a resiliency methodology for applications using structured adaptive mesh refinement, where failure modes map to granularities within the application for detection and correction. This approach also enables parameterization of cost for differentiated recovery. The cost model is built with tuning parameters that can be used to customize the strategy for different failure rates in different computing environments. We also show that this approach can make recovery cost proportional to the failure rate. Anshu Dubey, Hajime Fujita 0002, Daniel T. Graves, Andrew A. Chien, Devesh Tiwari |
SC | 3 |
| 2014 | A survey of high level frameworks in block-structured adaptive mesh refinement packages
Anshu Dubey, Ann S. Almgren, John B. Bell, Martin Berzins, Steven R. Brandt, Greg Bryan, Phillip Colella, Daniel T. Graves, Michael Lijewski, Frank Löffler 0001, Brian W. O'Shea, Erik Schnetter, Brian van Straalen, Klaus Weide |
J. Parallel Distributed Comput. | 8 |
| 2011 | Petascale Block-Structured AMR Applications without Distributed Meta-data
Brian van Straalen, Phillip Colella, Daniel T. Graves, Noel Keen |
Euro-Par (2) | 3 |