Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yifei Cheng 0002
dblp:51/10222-2
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
2as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-3859-2921ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 51% Deep learning architectures and training · 17% Optimization for machine learning · 11% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Parallel and multicore computing · 50% Distributed systems · 50% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | STL-SGD: Speeding Up Local SGD with Stagewise Communication Period · AAAI 2021 Faster Distributed Deep Net Training: Computation and Communication Decoupled Stochastic Gradient Descent · IJCAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
memory-efficient training |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | DropIT: Dropping Intermediate Tensors for Memory-Efficient DNN Training · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | DropIT: Dropping Intermediate Tensors for Memory-Efficient DNN Training · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › distributed optimization
communication-efficient distributed optimization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | STL-SGD: Speeding Up Local SGD with Stagewise Communication Period · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training › communication-efficient distributed SGD
local SGD |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | STL-SGD: Speeding Up Local SGD with Stagewise Communication Period · AAAI 2021 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Is Heuristic Sampling Necessary in Training Deep Object Detectors? · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
sampling-free training |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Is Heuristic Sampling Necessary in Training Deep Object Detectors? · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
distributed stochastic gradient descent |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Faster Distributed Deep Net Training: Computation and Communication Decoupled Stochastic Gradient Descent · IJCAI 2019 |
Distributed systems › communication optimization
communication-computation overlap |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Faster Distributed Deep Net Training: Computation and Communication Decoupled Stochastic Gradient Descent · IJCAI 2019 |
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel programming models and runtimes |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Faster Distributed Deep Net Training: Computation and Communication Decoupled Stochastic Gradient Descent · IJCAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training objective |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Is Heuristic Sampling Necessary in Training Deep Object Detectors? · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic gradient descent · 0.8computation-communication decoupling · 0.8intermediate tensor dropping · 0.7stagewise communication period · 0.5loss scaling · 0.5learning rate decay · 0.5initialization · 0.5gradient magnitude analysis · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Communication-efficient distributed learning with Local Immediate Error Compensation
Yifei Cheng 0002, Li Shen 0008, Linli Xu 0002, Xun Qian, Dacheng Tao, Enhong Chen |
Neural Networks | 1 |
| 2024 | Communication-efficient clustered federated learning via model distance
Mao Zhang 0002, Yifei Cheng 0002, Changcun Bao, Haoyu Cao 0001, Deqiang Jiang, Linli Xu 0002 |
Mach. Learn. | 3 |
| 2023 | DropIT: Dropping Intermediate Tensors for Memory-Efficient DNN Training
Joya Chen, Yifei Cheng 0002, Angela Yao |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2023 | Communication-efficient federated learning with stagewise training strategy
Yifei Cheng 0002, Shuheng Shen, Xianfeng Liang, Jingchang Liu, Joya Chen, Enhong Chen |
Neural Networks | 1 |
| 2022 | Accelerating local SGD for non-IID data using variance reduction
Xianfeng Liang, Shuheng Shen, Enhong Chen, Jinchang Liu, Qi Liu 0003, Yifei Cheng 0002, Zhen Pan |
Frontiers Comput. Sci. | 6 |
| 2021 | STL-SGD: Speeding Up Local SGD with Stagewise Communication PeriodabstractDistributed parallel stochastic gradient descent algorithms are workhorses for large scale machine learning tasks. Among them, local stochastic gradient descent (Local SGD) has attracted significant attention due to its low communication complexity. Previous studies prove that the communication complexity of Local SGD with a fixed or an adaptive communication period is in the order of O (N3/2 T1/2) and O (N3/4 T3/4) when the data distributions on clients are identical (IID) or otherwise (Non-IID), where N is the number of clients and T is the number of iterations. In this paper, to accelerate the convergence by reducing the communication complexity, we propose STagewise Local SGD (STL-SGD), which increases the communication period gradually along with decreasing learning rate. We prove that STL-SGD can keep the same convergence rate and linear speedup as mini-batch SGD. In addition, as the benefit of increasing the communication period, when the objective is strongly convex or satisfies the Polyak-Lojasiewicz condition, the communication complexity of STL-SGD is O (N log T ) and O (N1/2 T1/2) for the IID case and the Non-IID case respectively, achieving significant improvements over Local SGD. Experiments on both convex and non-convex problems demonstrate the superior performance of STL-SGD. Shuheng Shen, Yifei Cheng 0002, Jingchang Liu, Linli Xu 0002 |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2021 | Is Heuristic Sampling Necessary in Training Deep Object Detectors?abstractTo train accurate deep object detectors under the extreme foreground-background imbalance, heuristic sampling methods are always necessary, which either re-sample a subset of all training samples (hard sampling methods, e.g. biased sampling, OHEM), or use all training samples but re-weight them discriminatively (soft sampling methods, e.g. Focal Loss, GHM). In this paper, we challenge the necessity of such hard/soft sampling methods for training accurate deep object detectors. While previous studies have shown that training detectors without heuristic sampling methods would significantly degrade accuracy, we reveal that this degradation comes from an unreasonable classification gradient magnitude caused by the imbalance, rather than a lack of re-sampling/re-weighting. Motivated by our discovery, we propose a simple yet effective Sampling-Free mechanism to achieve a reasonable classification gradient magnitude by initialization and loss scaling. Unlike heuristic sampling methods with multiple hyperparameters, our Sampling-Free mechanism is fully data diagnostic, without laborious hyperparameters searching. We verify the effectiveness of our method in training anchor-based and anchor-free object detectors, where our method always achieves higher detection accuracy than heuristic sampling methods on COCO and PASCAL VOC datasets. Our Sampling-Free mechanism provides a new perspective to address the foreground-background imbalance. Our code is released at https://github.com/ChenJoya/sampling-free. Joya Chen, Dong Liu 0002, Tong Xu 0001, Yifei Cheng 0002, Enhong Chen |
IEEE Trans. Image Process. | 5 |
| 2019 | Faster Distributed Deep Net Training: Computation and Communication Decoupled Stochastic Gradient DescentabstractWith the increase in the amount of data and the expansion of model scale, distributed parallel training becomes an important and successful technique to address the optimization challenges. Nevertheless, although distributed stochastic gradient descent (SGD) algorithms can achieve a linear iteration speedup, they are limited significantly in practice by the communication cost, making it difficult to achieve a linear time speedup. In this paper, we propose a computation and communication decoupled stochastic gradient descent (CoCoD-SGD) algorithm to run computation and communication in parallel to reduce the communication cost. We prove that CoCoD-SGD has a linear iteration speedup with respect to the total computation capability of the hardware resources. In addition, it has a lower communication complexity and better time speedup comparing with traditional distributed SGD algorithms. Experiments on deep neural network training demonstrate the significant improvements of CoCoD-SGD: when training ResNet18 and VGG16 with 16 Geforce GTX 1080Ti GPUs, CoCoD-SGD is up to 2-3 x faster than traditional synchronous SGD. Shuheng Shen, Linli Xu 0002, Jingchang Liu, Xianfeng Liang, Yifei Cheng 0002 |
IJCAI | 5 |