Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael E. Stark

dblp:51/223 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design › requirements analysis
domain analysis
0.012000
Extending UML to Support Domain Analysis · ASE 2000
Requirements engineering and software design
software product lines
0.012000
Extending UML to Support Domain Analysis · ASE 2000
Requirements engineering and software design
model-driven engineering
0.012000
Extending UML to Support Domain Analysis · ASE 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

UML extension · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 Adopting and Institutionalizing a Product Line Culture
Günter Böckle, Jesús Bermejo Muñoz, Peter Knauber, Charles W. Krueger, Julio César Sampaio do Prado Leite, Frank van der Linden 0001, Linda M. Northrop, Michael E. Stark, David M. Weiss 0001
SPLC8
2000 Extending UML to Support Domain Analysis
abstract
Develops a domain engineering approach and the supporting tools to define software product lines. The approach is composed of a process and a notation. The notation is an extension of UML (Unified Modeling Language), while the process is influenced by the Synthesis and FAST domain engineering methods. Supporting tools have been built on top of a commercial CASE tool for UML. This paper focuses on the domain analysis part of the approach and specifically on the notation and tools to support it. The approach is being applied to sub-domains of the guidance, navigation and control domain, which are a set of functionalities used on-board satellites developed by the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.
Maurizio Morisio, Guilherme Horta Travassos, Michael E. Stark
ASE3