Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Paul Ogilvie
dblp:51/2611
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 9 · 5 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
4 papers |
Information retrieval · 45% Data mining · 39% Recommender systems · 10% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining
predictive modeling |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Business Applications of Predictive Modeling at Scale · KDD 2016 |
Information retrieval
retrieval models |
0.1 | 2 | 2004 | Understanding combination of evidence using generative probabilistic models for information retrieval (abstract only) · SIGIR 2004 Combining document representations for known-item search · SIGIR 2003 |
Information retrieval › document retrieval
structured document retrieval |
0.1 | 2 | 2007 | Structured retrieval for question answering · SIGIR 2007 Understanding combination of evidence using generative probabilistic models for information retrieval (abstract only) · SIGIR 2004 |
Information retrieval
question answering |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Structured retrieval for question answering · SIGIR 2007 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models
language model |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Understanding combination of evidence using generative probabilistic models for information retrieval (abstract only) · SIGIR 2004 |
Data mining › probabilistic model
probabilistic generative model |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Understanding combination of evidence using generative probabilistic models for information retrieval (abstract only) · SIGIR 2004 |
Data integration and cleaning
data fusion |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Combining document representations for known-item search · SIGIR 2003 |
Information retrieval › document retrieval › passage retrieval
sentence retrieval |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | Structured retrieval for question answering · SIGIR 2007 |
Information retrieval
evidence combination |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Understanding combination of evidence using generative probabilistic models for information retrieval (abstract only) · SIGIR 2004 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models › ad-hoc retrieval
known-item search |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Combining document representations for known-item search · SIGIR 2003 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
statistical modeling · 0.5predictive modeling platform · 0.5structured retrieval · 0.1bag-of-words retrieval · 0.1statistical language modeling · 0.0generative probabilistic modeling · 0.0metasearch algorithms · 0.0data fusion · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Business Applications of Predictive Modeling at ScaleabstractPredictive modeling is the art of building statistical models that forecast probabilities and trends of future events. It has broad applications in industry across different domains. Some popular examples include user intention predictions, lead scoring, churn analysis, etc. In this tutorial, we will focus on the best practice of predictive modeling in the big data era and its applications in industry, with motivating examples across a range of business tasks and relevance products. We will start with an overview of how predictive modeling helps power and drive various key business use cases. We will introduce the essential concepts and state of the art in building end-to-end predictive modeling solutions, and discuss the challenges, key technologies, and lessons learned from our practice, including case studies of LinkedIn feed relevance and a platform for email response prediction. Moreover, we will discuss some practical solutions of building predictive modeling platform to scale the modeling efforts for data scientists and analysts, along with an overview of popular tools and platforms used across the industry. Qiang Zhu 0002, Songtao Guo, Paul Ogilvie |
KDD | 3 |
| 2009 | On the number of terms used in automatic query expansion
Paul Ogilvie, Ellen M. Voorhees, Jamie Callan |
Inf. Retr. | 1 |
| 2007 | Structured retrieval for question answeringabstractBag-of-words retrieval is popular among Question Answering (QA) system developers, but it does not support constraint checking and ranking on the linguistic and semantic information of interest to the QA system. We present anapproach to retrieval for QA, applying structured retrieval techniques to the types of text annotations that QA systems use. We demonstrate that the structured approach can retrieve more relevant results, more highly ranked, compared with bag-of-words, on a sentence retrieval task. We also characterize the extent to which structured retrieval effectiveness depends on the quality of the annotations. Matthew W. Bilotti, Paul Ogilvie, Jamie Callan, Eric Nyberg |
SIGIR | 2 |
| 2006 | Investigating the exhaustivity dimension in content-oriented XML element retrieval evaluationabstractINEX, the evaluation initiative for content-oriented XML retrieval, has since its establishment defined the relevance of an element according to two graded dimensions, exhaustivity and specificity. The former measures how exhaustively an XML element discusses the topic of request, whereas specificity measures how focused the element is on the topic of request. The reason for having two dimensions was to provide a more stable measure of relevance than if assessors were asked to rate the relevance of an element on a single scale. However, obtaining relevance assessments is a costly task. as each document must be assessed for relevance by a human assessor. In XML retrieval this problem is exacerbated as the elements of the document must also be assessed with respect to the exhaustivity and specificity dimensions. A continuous discussion in INEX has been whether such a sophisticated definition of relevance, and in particular the exhaustivity dimension, was needed. This paper attempts to answer this question through extensive statistical tests to compare the conclusions about system performance that could be made under different assessment scenarios. Paul Ogilvie, Mounia Lalmas-Roelleke |
CIKM | 1 |
| 2004 | Understanding combination of evidence using generative probabilistic models for information retrieval (abstract only)abstractStructured documents, rich information needs, and detailed information about users are becoming more pervasive within everyday computing usage. Applications such as Question Answering, reading tutors, and XML retrieval demand more robust retrieval on richly annotated documents. In order to effectively serve these applications, the community will need a better understanding of the combination of evidence. In this work, I propose that the use of simple generative probabilistic models will be an effective framework for these problems. Statistical language models, which are a special case of generative probabilistic models, have been used extensively within recent Information Retrieval research. Their flexibility has been very effective in adapting to numerous tasks and problems. I propose to extend the statistical language modeling framework to handle rich information needs and documents with structural and linguistic annotations. Much of the prior work on combination of evidence has had few well-studied theoretical contributions, so I also propose to develop a sounder theoretical basis which gives more predictable results. Paul Ogilvie |
SIGIR | 1 |
| 2003 | Combining document representations for known-item searchabstractThis paper investigates the pre-conditions for successful combination of document representations formed from structural markup for the task of known-item search. As this task is very similar to work in meta-search and data fusion, we adapt several hypotheses from those research areas and investigate them in this context. To investigate these hypotheses, we present a mixture-based language model and also examine many of the current meta-search algorithms. We find that compatible output from systems is important for successful combination of document representations. We also demonstrate that combining low performing document representations can improve performance, but not consistently. We find that the techniques best suited for this task are robust to the inclusion of poorly performing document representations. We also explore the role of variance of results across systems and its impact on the performance of fusion, with the surprising result that the correct documents have higher variance across document representations than highly ranking incorrect documents. Paul Ogilvie, Jamie Callan |
SIGIR | 1 |
| 2002 | A language modeling framework for resource selection and results mergingabstractStatistical language models have been proposed recently for several information retrieval tasks, including the resource selection task in distributed information retrieval. This paper extends the language modeling approach to integrate resource selection, ad-hoc searching, and merging of results from different text databases into a single probabilistic retrieval model. This new approach is designed primarily for Intranet environments, where it is reasonable to assume that resource providers are relatively homogeneous and can adopt the same kind of search engine. Experiments demonstrate that this new, integrated approach is at least as effective as the prior state-of-the-art in distributed IR. Luo Si, Rong Jin 0001, Jamie Callan, Paul Ogilvie |
CIKM | 4 |
| 2001 | The Effectiveness of Query Expansion for Distributed Information RetrievalabstractQuery expansion has been shown effective for both single database retrieval and for distributed information retrieval where complete collection information is available. One might expect that query expansion would then work for distributed information retrieval when complete collection information is not available. However, this does not appear to be the case. When using local context analysis for query expansion in distributed retrieval with partial information, the most significant reason query expansion does not work is that merging scores of documents retrieved by expanded queries is very difficult. However, we have found that using sampled information for query expansion can give boosts in a single database environment, and that when more information is available, query expansion can work in distributed environments. We also show that most of the benefit of query expansion in distributed retrieval comes from finding good documents, and not from selecting good databases. 1 Paul Ogilvie, Jamie Callan |
CIKM | 1 |
| 2000 | Language Models for Financial News Recommendationabstract%$ & ' ( ) * + & , & -. / 10 2 43 !& , " 65 .7 98 : Victor Lavrenko, Matthew D. Schmill, Dawn J. Lawrie, Paul Ogilvie, David D. Jensen, James Allan 0001 |
CIKM | 4 |