Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Paul England

dblp:51/3259 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
11ranked-venue papers
4as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 7 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 50% Information retrieval · 50%
Network and information security
2 papers
Hardware security and side channels · 40% Cyber-physical and IoT security · 30% Systems and software security · 30%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Storage systems · 57% Integrated circuit design · 22% Cloud and datacenter computing · 16%
Computer networks
1 paper
Internet of things and sensor networks · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › anomaly detection › fraud detection
click fraud detection
0.912025
Identifying Incoherent Search Sessions: Search Click Fraud Remediation Under Real-World Constraints · SP 2025
Information retrieval › user behavior
search session analysis
0.912025
Identifying Incoherent Search Sessions: Search Click Fraud Remediation Under Real-World Constraints · SP 2025
Systems and software security
trusted computing
0.412019
Dominance as a New Trusted Computing Primitive for the Internet of Things · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2019
Hardware security and side channels
trusted execution environments
0.212016
fTPM: A Software-Only Implementation of a TPM Chip · USENIX Security Symposium 2016
Hardware security and side channels › trusted execution environments
trusted platform module
0.212016
fTPM: A Software-Only Implementation of a TPM Chip · USENIX Security Symposium 2016
Cloud and datacenter computing
datacenter storage
0.112014
Pelican: A Building Block for Exascale Cold Data Storage · OSDI 2014
Storage systems
distributed storage
0.011996
Calliope: A Distributed, Scalable Multimedia Server · USENIX ATC 1996
Storage systems
scalable storage
0.011996
Calliope: A Distributed, Scalable Multimedia Server · USENIX ATC 1996

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

temporal feature analysis · 0.9semantic feature integration · 0.9ad-click behavioral analysis · 0.9trusted computing · 0.8firmware update · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Identifying Incoherent Search Sessions: Search Click Fraud Remediation Under Real-World Constraints
abstract
Search engines and advertisers continuously suffer substantial financial losses from click fraud, which poses challenges to existing detection algorithms. Even more concerning, despite ongoing advancements, our understanding of click fraud remains limited, leaving room for sophisticated fraudulent techniques to bypass existing detection measures. In this study, we pivot from examining individual search requests to analyzing search sessions, defined as sequences of consecutive search queries made by the same user. We found that benign users exhibit coherent behavior patterns within these sessions, which contrast clearly with those of fraudulent actors. Specifically, legitimate users tend to conduct searches focused on a single topic at a time. In contrast, fraudsters or automated bots often exhibit diverse, illogical, and incoherent search behaviors within a session. To address this behavioral distinction, we propose CoSeC, a system designed to quantify the “incoherence index” of search sessions. CoSeC integrates literal semantic, temporal, and ad-click behavioral features to evaluate sessions' coherence quantitatively. Our evaluation of CoSeC demonstrates high efficacy, achieving a precision of 95.79% and a recall of 92.40% in identifying incoherent sessions, highlighting CoSeC's substantial potential to enhance real-world click fraud detection.
Ranjita Pai Sridhar, Mingxuan Yao, David Oygenblik, Haichuan Xu, Vacha Dave, Cormac Herley, Paul England, Brendan Saltaformaggio
SP9
2021 AMP: authentication of media via provenance
abstract
Advances in graphics and machine learning have led to the general availability of easy-to-use tools for modifying and synthesizing media. The proliferation of these tools threatens to cast doubt on the veracity of all media. One approach to thwarting the flow of fake media is to detect modified or synthesized media through machine learning methods. While detection may help in the short term, we believe that it is destined to fail as the quality of fake media generation continues to improve. Soon, neither humans nor algorithms will be able to reliably distinguish fake versus real content. Thus, pipelines for assuring the source and integrity of media will be required---and increasingly relied upon. We present AMP, a system that ensures the authentication of media via certifying provenance. AMP creates one or more publisher-signed manifests for a media instance uploaded by a content provider. These manifests are stored in a database allowing fast lookup from applications such as browsers. For reference, the manifests are also registered and signed by a permissioned ledger, implemented using the Confidential Consortium Framework (CCF). CCF employs both software and hardware techniques to ensure the integrity and transparency of all registered manifests. AMP, through its use of CCF, enables a consortium of media providers to govern the service while making all its operations auditable. The authenticity of the media can be communicated to the user via visual elements in the browser, indicating that an AMP manifest has been successfully located and verified.
Paul England, Henrique S. Malvar, Eric Horvitz, Jack W. Stokes, Cédric Fournet, Rebecca Burke-Aguero, Amaury Chamayou, Sylvan Clebsch, Manuel Costa, John Deutscher, Shabnam Erfani, Matt Gaylor, Andrew Jenks, Kevin Kane, Elissa M. Redmiles, Alex Shamis, Isha Sharma, John C. Simmons, Sam Wenker, Anika Zaman
MMSys1
2019 Dominance as a New Trusted Computing Primitive for the Internet of Things
abstract
The Internet of Things (IoT) is rapidly emerging as one of the dominant computing paradigms of this decade. Applications range from in-home entertainment to large-scale industrial deployments such as controlling assembly lines and monitoring traffic. While IoT devices are in many respects similar to traditional computers, user expectations and deployment scenarios as well as cost and hardware constraints are sufficiently different to create new security challenges as well as new opportunities. This is especially true for large-scale IoT deployments in which a central entity deploys and controls a large number of IoT devices with minimal human interaction. Like traditional computers, IoT devices are subject to attack and compromise. Large IoT deployments consisting of many nearly identical devices are especially attractive targets. At the same time, recovery from root compromise by conventional means becomes costly and slow, even more so if the devices are dispersed over a large geographical area. In the worst case, technicians have to travel to all devices and manually recover them. Data center solutions such as the Intelligent Platform Management Interface (IPMI) which rely on separate service processors and network connections are not only not supported by existing IoT hardware, but are unlikely to be in the foreseeable future due to the cost constraints of mainstream IoT devices. This paper presents Cider, a system that can recover IoT devices within a short amount of time, even if attackers have taken root control of every device in a large deployment. The recovery requires minimal manual intervention. After the administrator has identified the compromise and produced an updated firmware image, he/she can instruct Cider to force the devices to reset and to install the patched firmware on the devices. We demonstrate the universality and practicality of Cider by implementing it on three popular IoT platforms (HummingBoard Edge, Raspberry Pi Compute Module 3 and Nucleo-L476RG) spanning the range from high to low end. Our evaluation shows that the performance overhead of Cider is generally negligible.
Meng Xu 0001, Manuel Huber 0001, Zhichuang Sun, Paul England, Marcus Peinado, Sangho Lee 0001, Andrey Marochko, Dennis Mattoon, Rob Spiger, Stefan Thom
IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy4
2016 fTPM: A Software-Only Implementation of a TPM Chip
Himanshu Raj, Stefan Saroiu, Alec Wolman, Ronald Aigner, Jeremiah Cox, Paul England, Chris Fenner, Kinshuman Kinshumann, Jork Löser, Dennis Mattoon, Magnus Nyström, Rob Spiger, Stefan Thom, David Wooten
USENIX Security Symposium6
2014 Pelican: A Building Block for Exascale Cold Data Storage
Shobana Balakrishnan, Richard Black, Austin Donnelly, Paul England, Adam Glass, David Harper, Sergey Legtchenko, Aaron Ogus, Eric Peterson, Antony I. T. Rowstron
OSDI4
2012 Trusted VM Snapshots in Untrusted Cloud Infrastructures
Abhinav Srivastava, Himanshu Raj, Jonathon T. Giffin, Paul England
RAID4
2006 Virtual machines for enterprise desktop security
Paul England, John Manferdelli
Inf. Secur. Tech. Rep.1
2004 NGSCB: A Trusted Open System
Marcus Peinado, Yuqun Chen, Paul England, John Manferdelli
ACISP3
2002 Authenticated Operation of Open Computing Devices
Paul England, Marcus Peinado
ACISP1
1996 Calliope: A Distributed, Scalable Multimedia Server
Andrew Heybey, Mark Sullivan, Paul England
USENIX ATC3
1996 RAVE: Real-Time Services for the Web
Paul England, Robert B. Allen, Ron Underwood
Comput. Networks1