Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Steve Rabin
dblp:51/3871
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › pathfinding
grid-based pathfinding |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Combining Bounding Boxes and JPS to Prune Grid Pathfinding · AAAI 2016 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
pathfinding |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Combining Bounding Boxes and JPS to Prune Grid Pathfinding · AAAI 2016 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › planar graphs
canonical orderings |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Canonical Orderings on Grids · IJCAI 2016 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph algorithms
graph search |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Canonical Orderings on Grids · IJCAI 2016 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › planar graphs
grid graphs |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Canonical Orderings on Grids · IJCAI 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
canonical orderings · 0.2bounding boxes · 0.2JPS+ · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Combining Bounding Boxes and JPS to Prune Grid PathfindingabstractPathfinding is a common task across many domains and platforms, whether in games, robotics, or road maps. Given the breadth of domains, there are also a wide variety of representations used for pathfinding, and there are many techniques which have been shown to improve performance. In the last few years, the state-of-the-art in grid-based pathfinding has been significantly improved with domain-specific techniques such as Jump Point Search (JPS), Subgoal Graphs, and Compressed Path Databases. In this paper we look at a specific implementation of the general idea of Geometric Containers, showing that, while it is effective on grid maps, when combined with JPS+ it provides state-of-the-art performance. Steve Rabin, Nathan R. Sturtevant |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2016 | Canonical Orderings on Grids
Nathan R. Sturtevant, Steve Rabin |
IJCAI | 2 |
| 2015 | The Grid-Based Path Planning Competition: 2014 Entries and ResultsabstractThe Grid-Based Path Planning Competition has just completed its third iteration. The entriesused in the competition have improved significantly during this time, changing the view ofthe state of the art of grid-based pathfinding. Furthermore, the entries from the competition have beenmade publicly available, improving the ability of researchers to compare their work. Thispaper summarizes the entries to the 2014 competition, presents the 2014 competition results,and talks about what has been learned and where there is room for improvement. Nathan R. Sturtevant, Jason M. Traish, James R. Tulip, Tansel Uras, Sven Koenig, Ben Strasser, Adi Botea, Daniel Harabor, Steve Rabin |
SOCS | 9 |