Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Fred Piper

dblp:51/4316 · also Fred C. Piper · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
18ranked-venue papers
10as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 11 · 6 first-authorComputer networks · 3 · 3 first-authorTheory of computation · 3Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Network security · 69% Privacy and data protection · 30% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 0%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection
anonymity
0.412019
Perfect Anonymity · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2019
Network security › anonymity networks
anonymous communication
0.412019
Perfect Anonymity · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2019
Network security › anonymity networks › anonymous communication protocol
dining cryptographers
0.412019
Perfect Anonymity · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2019
Network security
anonymity networks
0.112019
Perfect Anonymity · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2019
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics
combinatorial design
0.011989
Linear Ciphers and Spreads · J. Cryptol. 1989

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

information-theoretic security · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Perfect Anonymity
abstract
For 35 years, the cryptographic community has created the impression that anonymous communication is always possible. Chaum's dining cryptographer's solution is regarded as achieving unconditional security. Chaum's MIX approach, namely, applying a uniformly random permutation on the plaintexts to be sent, is often given as a definition for anonymity. However, people working in law enforcement know that attempts by whistle-blowers and criminals to remain at large, often fail. The content of the message may reveal the name of the sender or may leak for whom the message is really intended. To understand this issue, we give a definition of perfect anonymity. We contrast our definition with Chaum's approach and discuss the impact on Chaum's dining cryptographer's solution.
Yvo Desmedt, Fred Piper
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory2
2010 The status of National PKIs - A European overview
Dimitrios Patsos, Chez Ciechanowicz, Fred Piper
Inf. Secur. Tech. Rep.3
2009 The Changing Face of Cryptography
Fred Piper
IWDW1
2007 ID-based cryptography using symmetric primitives
Chris J. Mitchell, Fred Piper, Peter R. Wild
Des. Codes Cryptogr.2
2005 Cyberworld Security-the Good, the Bad and the Ugly*
abstract
The 2004 Turing Lecture was held on 21 January 2004. It was given by Fred Piper, who is the joint author of Cipher Systems (1982), one of the first books to be published on the subject of protection of communications, Secure Speech Communications (1985), Cryptography: A Very Short Introduction (2002), and an ISACA research monograph on digital signatures (1999). He has been a member of a number of DTI advisory committees and is a member of the Board of Trustees for Bletchley Park. The annual Turing Lecture, organized by the British Computer Society and the Institute of Electrical Engineering, commemorates the central seminal figure in the computer revolution, Alan Turing, whose outstanding originality and vision made it possible, in work originating in the mid 1930s. Although it is now hard to see what the limits of the computer revolution might eventually be, it was Turing himself who pointed out to us the very existence of such theoretical limitations.
Fred Piper
Comput. J.1
2003 Reseacrh in cryptography and security mechanisms
Fred Piper
Comput. Secur.1
2003 Introduction
Fred Piper, Geraint Price, Kenneth G. Paterson
Inf. Secur. Tech. Rep.1
1997 Trusted Third Parties for Secure Electronic Commerce - Are They Needed?
Fred Piper
ACISP1
1997 A General Zero-Knowledge Scheme
Mike Burmester, Yvo Desmedt, Fred Piper, Michael Walker 0001
Des. Codes Cryptogr.3
1997 Introduction to cryptology
Fred Piper
Inf. Secur. Tech. Rep.1
1996 Authentication Schemes, Perfect Local Randomizers, Perfect Secrecy and Secret Sharing Schemes
Chris J. Mitchell, Fred Piper, Michael Walker 0001, Peter R. Wild
Des. Codes Cryptogr.2
1991 Comment
Fred Piper
Comput. Commun.1
1990 Computer and communications security: J A Cooper
Fred Piper
Comput. Commun.1
1990 Linear recursion properties of uncorrelated binary sequences
A. J. Bromfield, Fred Piper
Discret. Appl. Math.2
1989 Linear Ciphers and Spreads
Fred Piper, Michael Walker 0001
J. Cryptol.1
1988 Key storage in secure networks
Chris J. Mitchell, Fred Piper
Discret. Appl. Math.2
1987 The cost of reducing key-storage requirements in secure networks
Chris J. Mitchell, Fred Piper
Comput. Secur.2
1986 Primality and cryptography
Fred Piper
Comput. Commun.1