Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Fred Piper
dblp:51/4316 · also Fred C. Piper
· DBLP profile ↗
18ranked-venue papers
10as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 11 · 6 first-authorComputer networks · 3 · 3 first-authorTheory of computation · 3Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Network security · 69% Privacy and data protection · 30% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 0% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection
anonymity |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Perfect Anonymity · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2019 |
Network security › anonymity networks
anonymous communication |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Perfect Anonymity · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2019 |
Network security › anonymity networks › anonymous communication protocol
dining cryptographers |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Perfect Anonymity · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2019 |
Network security
anonymity networks |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Perfect Anonymity · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2019 |
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics
combinatorial design |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Linear Ciphers and Spreads · J. Cryptol. 1989 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
information-theoretic security · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Perfect AnonymityabstractFor 35 years, the cryptographic community has created the impression that anonymous communication is always possible. Chaum's dining cryptographer's solution is regarded as achieving unconditional security. Chaum's MIX approach, namely, applying a uniformly random permutation on the plaintexts to be sent, is often given as a definition for anonymity. However, people working in law enforcement know that attempts by whistle-blowers and criminals to remain at large, often fail. The content of the message may reveal the name of the sender or may leak for whom the message is really intended. To understand this issue, we give a definition of perfect anonymity. We contrast our definition with Chaum's approach and discuss the impact on Chaum's dining cryptographer's solution. Yvo Desmedt, Fred Piper |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 2 |
| 2010 | The status of National PKIs - A European overview
Dimitrios Patsos, Chez Ciechanowicz, Fred Piper |
Inf. Secur. Tech. Rep. | 3 |
| 2009 | The Changing Face of Cryptography
Fred Piper |
IWDW | 1 |
| 2007 | ID-based cryptography using symmetric primitives
Chris J. Mitchell, Fred Piper, Peter R. Wild |
Des. Codes Cryptogr. | 2 |
| 2005 | Cyberworld Security-the Good, the Bad and the Ugly*abstractThe 2004 Turing Lecture was held on 21 January 2004. It was given by Fred Piper, who is the joint author of Cipher Systems (1982), one of the first books to be published on the subject of protection of communications, Secure Speech Communications (1985), Cryptography: A Very Short Introduction (2002), and an ISACA research monograph on digital signatures (1999). He has been a member of a number of DTI advisory committees and is a member of the Board of Trustees for Bletchley Park. The annual Turing Lecture, organized by the British Computer Society and the Institute of Electrical Engineering, commemorates the central seminal figure in the computer revolution, Alan Turing, whose outstanding originality and vision made it possible, in work originating in the mid 1930s. Although it is now hard to see what the limits of the computer revolution might eventually be, it was Turing himself who pointed out to us the very existence of such theoretical limitations. Fred Piper |
Comput. J. | 1 |
| 2003 | Reseacrh in cryptography and security mechanisms
Fred Piper |
Comput. Secur. | 1 |
| 2003 | Introduction
Fred Piper, Geraint Price, Kenneth G. Paterson |
Inf. Secur. Tech. Rep. | 1 |
| 1997 | Trusted Third Parties for Secure Electronic Commerce - Are They Needed?
Fred Piper |
ACISP | 1 |
| 1997 | A General Zero-Knowledge Scheme
Mike Burmester, Yvo Desmedt, Fred Piper, Michael Walker 0001 |
Des. Codes Cryptogr. | 3 |
| 1997 | Introduction to cryptology
Fred Piper |
Inf. Secur. Tech. Rep. | 1 |
| 1996 | Authentication Schemes, Perfect Local Randomizers, Perfect Secrecy and Secret Sharing Schemes
Chris J. Mitchell, Fred Piper, Michael Walker 0001, Peter R. Wild |
Des. Codes Cryptogr. | 2 |
| 1991 | Comment
Fred Piper |
Comput. Commun. | 1 |
| 1990 | Computer and communications security: J A Cooper
Fred Piper |
Comput. Commun. | 1 |
| 1990 | Linear recursion properties of uncorrelated binary sequences
A. J. Bromfield, Fred Piper |
Discret. Appl. Math. | 2 |
| 1989 | Linear Ciphers and Spreads
Fred Piper, Michael Walker 0001 |
J. Cryptol. | 1 |
| 1988 | Key storage in secure networks
Chris J. Mitchell, Fred Piper |
Discret. Appl. Math. | 2 |
| 1987 | The cost of reducing key-storage requirements in secure networks
Chris J. Mitchell, Fred Piper |
Comput. Secur. | 2 |
| 1986 | Primality and cryptography
Fred Piper |
Comput. Commun. | 1 |