Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jean-Philippe Doyon

dblp:51/4928 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › phylogenetics
gene tree reconciliation
0.212016
SylvX: a viewer for phylogenetic tree reconciliations · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology
phylogenetics
0.212016
SylvX: a viewer for phylogenetic tree reconciliations · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology › phylogenetics › phyloinformatics
phylogenetic tree visualization
0.212016
SylvX: a viewer for phylogenetic tree reconciliations · Bioinform. 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tree reconciliation · 0.2graphical operators · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 SylvX: a viewer for phylogenetic tree reconciliations
abstract
MOTIVATION: Reconciliation methods aim at recovering the evolutionary processes that shaped the history of a given gene family including events such as duplications, transfers and losses by comparing the discrepancies between the topologies of the associated gene and species trees. These methods are also used in the framework of host/parasite studies to recover co-diversification scenarios including co-speciation events, host-switches and extinctions. These evolutionary processes can be graphically represented as nested trees. These interconnected graphs can be visually messy and hard to interpret, and despite the fact that reconciliations are increasingly used, there is a shortage of tools dedicated to their graphical management. Here we present SylvX, a reconciliation viewer which implements classical phylogenetic graphic operators (swapping, highlighting, etc.) and new methods to ease interpretation and comparison of reconciliations (multiple maps, moving, shrinking sub-reconciliations). AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SylvX is an open source, cross-platform, standalone editor available for Windows and Unix-like systems including OSX. It is publicly available at www.sylvx.org.
François Chevenet, Jean-Philippe Doyon, Céline Scornavacca, Edwin Jacox, Emmanuelle Jousselin, Vincent Berry
Bioinform.2
2012 Accounting for Gene Tree Uncertainties Improves Gene Trees and Reconciliation Inference
Thi Hau Nguyen, Jean-Philippe Doyon, Stéphanie Pointet, Anne-Muriel Arigon Chifolleau, Vincent Ranwez, Vincent Berry
WABI2
2012 An Efficient Method for Exploring the Space of Gene Tree/Species Tree Reconciliations in a Probabilistic Framework
abstract
BACKGROUND: Inferring an evolutionary scenario for a gene family is a fundamental problem with applications both in functional and evolutionary genomics. The gene tree/species tree reconciliation approach has been widely used to address this problem, but mostly in a discrete parsimony framework that aims at minimizing the number of gene duplications and/or gene losses. Recently, a probabilistic approach has been developed, based on the classical birth-and-death process, including efficient algorithms for computing posterior probabilities of reconciliations and orthology prediction. RESULTS: In previous work, we described an algorithm for exploring the whole space of gene tree/species tree reconciliations, that we adapt here to compute efficiently the posterior probability of such reconciliations. These posterior probabilities can be either computed exactly or approximated, depending on the reconciliation space size. We use this algorithm to analyze the probabilistic landscape of the space of reconciliations for a real data set of fungal gene families and several data sets of synthetic gene trees. CONCLUSION: The results of our simulations suggest that, with exact gene trees obtained by a simple birth-and-death process and realistic gene duplication/loss rates, a very small subset of all reconciliations needs to be explored in order to approximate very closely the posterior probability of the most likely reconciliations. For cases where the posterior probability mass is more evenly dispersed, our method allows to explore efficiently the required subspace of reconciliations.
Jean-Philippe Doyon, Sylvie Hamel, Cédric Chauve
IEEE ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform.1
2011 Models, algorithms and programs for phylogeny reconciliation
abstract
Gene sequences contain a gold mine of phylogenetic information. But unfortunately for taxonomists this information does not only tell the story of the species from which it was collected. Genes have their own complex histories which record speciation events, of course, but also many other events. Among them, gene duplications, transfers and losses are especially important to identify. These events are crucial to account for when reconstructing the history of species, and they play a fundamental role in the evolution of genomes, the diversification of organisms and the emergence of new cellular functions. We review reconciliations between gene and species trees, which are rigorous approaches for identifying duplications, transfers and losses that mark the evolution of a gene family. Existing reconciliation models and algorithms are reviewed and difficulties in modeling gene transfers are discussed. We also compare different reconciliation programs along with their advantages and disadvantages.
Jean-Philippe Doyon, Vincent Ranwez, Vincent Daubin, Vincent Berry
Briefings Bioinform.1