Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Arndt Benecke
dblp:51/5444
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
0000-0002-7121-823XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 64% Computational science and engineering · 36% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational science and engineering
high-dimensional data analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Improving the efficiency of multidimensional scaling in the analysis of high-dimensional data using singular value decomposition · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems biology
computational systems biology |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Modelling Epigenetic Information Maintenance: A Kappa Tutorial · CAV 2009 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems biology
rule-based modeling |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Modelling Epigenetic Information Maintenance: A Kappa Tutorial · CAV 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
singular value decomposition · 0.1multidimensional scaling · 0.1k-nearest neighbor · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | Improving the efficiency of multidimensional scaling in the analysis of high-dimensional data using singular value decompositionabstractMOTIVATION: Multidimensional scaling (MDS) is a well-known multivariate statistical analysis method used for dimensionality reduction and visualization of similarities and dissimilarities in multidimensional data. The advantage of MDS with respect to singular value decomposition (SVD) based methods such as principal component analysis is its superior fidelity in representing the distance between different instances specially for high-dimensional geometric objects. Here, we investigate the importance of the choice of initial conditions for MDS, and show that SVD is the best choice to initiate MDS. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the use of the first principal components of SVD to initiate the MDS algorithm is more efficient than an iteration through all the principal components. Adding stochasticity to the molecular dynamics simulations typically used for MDS of large datasets, contrary to previous suggestions, likewise does not increase accuracy. Finally, we introduce a k nearest neighbor method to analyze the local structure of the geometric objects and use it to control the quality of the dimensionality reduction. RESULTS: We demonstrate here the, to our knowledge, most efficient and accurate initialization strategy for MDS algorithms, reducing considerably computational load. SVD-based initialization renders MDS methodology much more useful in the analysis of high-dimensional data such as functional genomics datasets. Christophe Bécavin, Nicolas Tchitchek, Colette Mintsa-Eya, Annick Lesne, Arndt Benecke |
Bioinform. | 5 |
| 2009 | Modelling Epigenetic Information Maintenance: A Kappa Tutorial
Jean Krivine, Vincent Danos, Arndt Benecke |
CAV | 3 |
| 2005 | Avoiding inconsistencies over time and tracking difficulties in Applied Biosystems AB1700TM/PantherTM probe-to-gene annotationsabstractBACKGROUND: Significant inconsistencies between probe-to-gene annotations between different releases of probe set identifiers by commercial microarray platform solutions have been reported. Such inconsistencies lead to misleading or ambiguous interpretation of published gene expression results. RESULTS: We report here similar inconsistencies in the probe-to-gene annotation of Applied Biosystems AB1700 data, demonstrating that this is not an isolated concern. Moreover, the online information source PANTHER does not provide information required to track such inconsistencies, hence, even correctly annotated datasets, when resubmitted after PANTHER was updated to a new probe-to-gene annotation release, will generate differing results without any feedback on the origin of the change. CONCLUSION: The importance of unequivocal annotation of microarray experiments can not be underestimated. Inconsistencies greatly diminish the usefulness of the technology. Novel methods in the analysis of transcriptome profiles often rely on large disparate datasets stemming from multiple sources. The predictive and analytic power of such approaches rapidly diminishes if only least-common subsets can be used for analysis. We present here the information that needs to be provided together with the raw AB1700 data, and the information required together with the biologic interpretation of such data to avoid inconsistencies and tracking difficulties. Sebastian Noth, Arndt Benecke |
BMC Bioinform. | 2 |