Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Arndt Benecke

dblp:51/5444 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
0000-0002-7121-823XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 64% Computational science and engineering · 36%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational science and engineering
high-dimensional data analysis
0.112011
Improving the efficiency of multidimensional scaling in the analysis of high-dimensional data using singular value decomposition · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems biology
computational systems biology
0.112009
Modelling Epigenetic Information Maintenance: A Kappa Tutorial · CAV 2009
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems biology
rule-based modeling
0.112009
Modelling Epigenetic Information Maintenance: A Kappa Tutorial · CAV 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

singular value decomposition · 0.1multidimensional scaling · 0.1k-nearest neighbor · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Improving the efficiency of multidimensional scaling in the analysis of high-dimensional data using singular value decomposition
abstract
MOTIVATION: Multidimensional scaling (MDS) is a well-known multivariate statistical analysis method used for dimensionality reduction and visualization of similarities and dissimilarities in multidimensional data. The advantage of MDS with respect to singular value decomposition (SVD) based methods such as principal component analysis is its superior fidelity in representing the distance between different instances specially for high-dimensional geometric objects. Here, we investigate the importance of the choice of initial conditions for MDS, and show that SVD is the best choice to initiate MDS. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the use of the first principal components of SVD to initiate the MDS algorithm is more efficient than an iteration through all the principal components. Adding stochasticity to the molecular dynamics simulations typically used for MDS of large datasets, contrary to previous suggestions, likewise does not increase accuracy. Finally, we introduce a k nearest neighbor method to analyze the local structure of the geometric objects and use it to control the quality of the dimensionality reduction. RESULTS: We demonstrate here the, to our knowledge, most efficient and accurate initialization strategy for MDS algorithms, reducing considerably computational load. SVD-based initialization renders MDS methodology much more useful in the analysis of high-dimensional data such as functional genomics datasets.
Christophe Bécavin, Nicolas Tchitchek, Colette Mintsa-Eya, Annick Lesne, Arndt Benecke
Bioinform.5
2009 Modelling Epigenetic Information Maintenance: A Kappa Tutorial
Jean Krivine, Vincent Danos, Arndt Benecke
CAV3
2005 Avoiding inconsistencies over time and tracking difficulties in Applied Biosystems AB1700TM/PantherTM probe-to-gene annotations
abstract
BACKGROUND: Significant inconsistencies between probe-to-gene annotations between different releases of probe set identifiers by commercial microarray platform solutions have been reported. Such inconsistencies lead to misleading or ambiguous interpretation of published gene expression results. RESULTS: We report here similar inconsistencies in the probe-to-gene annotation of Applied Biosystems AB1700 data, demonstrating that this is not an isolated concern. Moreover, the online information source PANTHER does not provide information required to track such inconsistencies, hence, even correctly annotated datasets, when resubmitted after PANTHER was updated to a new probe-to-gene annotation release, will generate differing results without any feedback on the origin of the change. CONCLUSION: The importance of unequivocal annotation of microarray experiments can not be underestimated. Inconsistencies greatly diminish the usefulness of the technology. Novel methods in the analysis of transcriptome profiles often rely on large disparate datasets stemming from multiple sources. The predictive and analytic power of such approaches rapidly diminishes if only least-common subsets can be used for analysis. We present here the information that needs to be provided together with the raw AB1700 data, and the information required together with the biologic interpretation of such data to avoid inconsistencies and tracking difficulties.
Sebastian Noth, Arndt Benecke
BMC Bioinform.2