Ahmed M. Nazif

dblp:51/6323 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1986
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Segmentation and scene understanding · 72% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 28%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
image segmentation
0.011985
Dynamic Measurement of Computer Generated Image Segmentations · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1985
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › image segmentation
segmentation evaluation
0.011985
Dynamic Measurement of Computer Generated Image Segmentations · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1985
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › expert systems
rule-based expert systems
0.011984
Low Level Image Segmentation: An Expert System · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1984
Image and video processing
image segmentation
0.011984
Low Level Image Segmentation: An Expert System · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1984
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
region analysis
0.011985
Dynamic Measurement of Computer Generated Image Segmentations · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1985

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

rule-based expert system · 0.0control rules · 0.0uniformity and contrast measures · 0.0metarules · 0.0meta-rules · 0.0focus of attention · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1986 Authors' Reply
Martin D. Levine, Ahmed M. Nazif
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2
1985 Rule-based image segmentation: A dynamic control strategy approach
Martin D. Levine, Ahmed M. Nazif
Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process.2
1985 Dynamic Measurement of Computer Generated Image Segmentations
abstract
This paper introduces a general purpose performance measurement scheme for image segmentation algorithms. Performance parameters that function in real-time distinguish this method from previous approaches that depended on an a priori knowledge of the correct segmentation. A low level, context independent definition of segmentation is used to obtain a set of optimization criteria for evaluating performance. Uniformity within each region and contrast between adjacent regions serve as parameters for region analysis. Contrast across lines and connectivity between them represent measures for line analysis. Texture is depicted by the introduction of focus of attention areas as groups of regions and lines. The performance parameters are then measured separately for each area. The usefulness of this approach lies in the ability to adjust the strategy of a system according to the varying characteristics of different areas. This feedback path provides the means for more efficient and error-free processing. Results from areas with dissimilar properties show a diversity in the measurements that is utilized for dynamic strategy setting.
Martin D. Levine, Ahmed M. Nazif
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2
1984 Low Level Image Segmentation: An Expert System
abstract
A major problem in robotic vision is the segmentation of images of natural scenes in order to understand their content. This paper presents a new solution to the image segmentation problem that is based on the design of a rule-based expert system. General knowledge about low level properties of processes employ the rules to segment the image into uniform regions and connected lines. In addition to the knowledge rules, a set of control rules are also employed. These include metarules that embody inferences about the order in which the knowledge rules are matched. They also incorporate focus of attention rules that determine the path of processing within the image. Furthermore, an additional set of higher level rules dynamically alters the processing strategy. This paper discusses the structure and content of the knowledge and control rules for image segmentation.
Ahmed M. Nazif, Martin D. Levine
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1
1984 An optimal set of image segmentation rules
Martin D. Levine, Ahmed M. Nazif
Pattern Recognit. Lett.2