Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Tom Cornell

dblp:51/638 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Logic in computer science · 50% Automata and formal languages · 30% Computational complexity · 20%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 84% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 16%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing
0.011997
Representing Constraints with Automata · ACL 1997
Logic in computer science
monadic second-order logic
0.011997
Representing Constraints with Automata · ACL 1997
Automata and formal languages
tree automata
0.011997
Representing Constraints with Automata · ACL 1997
Computational complexity › constraint satisfaction
consistency checking
0.011994
On Determining the Consistency of Partial Descriptions of Trees · ACL 1994

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

constraint logic programming · 0.0remote dominance · 0.0disjunction and negation handling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1997 Representing Constraints with Automata
abstract
In this paper we describe an approach to constraint based syntactic theories in terms of finite tree automata. The solutions to constraints expressed in weak monadic second order (MSO) logic are represented by tree automata recognizing the assignments which make the formulas true. We show that this allows an efficient representation of knowledge about the content of constraints which can be used as a practical tool for grammatical theory verification. We achieve this by using the intertranslatability of formulae of MSO logic and tree automata and the embedding of MSO logic into a constraint logic programming scheme. The usefulness of the approach is discussed with examples from the realm of Principles-and-Parameters based parsing.
Frank Morawietz, Tom Cornell
ACL2
1994 On Determining the Consistency of Partial Descriptions of Trees
abstract
We examine the consistency problem for descriptions of trees based on remote dominance, and present a consistency-checking algorithm which is polynomial in the number of nodes in the description, despite disjunctions inherent in the theory of trees. The resulting algorithm allows for descriptions which go beyond sets of atomic formulas to allow certain types of disjunction and negation.
Tom Cornell
ACL1