Background: Several meta-analysis methods can be used to quantitatively combine the results of a group of experiments, including the weighted mean difference, statistical vote counting, the parametric response ratio and the non-parametric response ratio. The software engineering community has focused on the weighted mean difference method. However, other meta-analysis methods have distinct strengths, such as being able to be used when variances are not reported. There are as yet no guidelines to indicate which method is best for use in each case Aim: Compile a set of rules that SE researchers can use to ascertain which aggregation method is best for use in the synthesis phase of a systematic review. Method: Monte Carlo simulation varying the number of experiments in the meta analyses, the number of subjects that they include, their variance and effect size. We empirically calculated the reliability and statistical power in each case Results: WMD is generally reliable if the variance is low, whereas its power depends on the effect size and number of subjects per meta-analysis; the reliability of RR is generally unaffected by changes in variance, but it does require more subjects than WMD to be powerful; NPRR is the most reliable method, but it is not very powerful; SVC behaves well when the effect size is moderate, but is less reliable with other effect sizes. Detailed tables of results are annexed. Conclusions: Before undertaking statistical aggregation in software engineering, it is worthwhile checking whether there is any appreciable difference in the reliability and power of the methods. If there is, software engineers should select the method that optimizes both parameters.

All meta-analyses should include a heterogeneity analysis. Even so, it is not easy to decide whether a set of studies are homogeneous or heterogeneous because of the low statistical power of the statistics used (usually the Q test). Objective: Determine a set of rules enabling SE researchers to find out, based on the characteristics of the experiments to be aggregated, whether or not it is feasible to accurately detect heterogeneity. Method: Evaluate the statistical power of heterogeneity detection methods using a Monte Carlo simulation process. Results: The Q test is not powerful when the meta-analysis contains up to a total of about 200 experimental subjects and the effect size difference is less than 1. Conclusions: The Q test cannot be used as a decision-making criterion for meta-analysis in small sample settings like SE. Random effects models should be used instead of fixed effects models. Caution should be exercised when applying Q test-mediated decomposition into subgroups.

Multithreaded architectures are becoming more and more popular. In order to evaluate their behavior, several methodologies and metrics have been proposed. A methodology defines when the measurements for a given workload execution are taken. A metric combines those measurements to obtain a final evaluation result. However, since current evaluation methodologies do not provide representative measurements for these metrics, the analysis and evaluation of novel ideas could be either unfair or misleading. Given the potential impact of multithreaded architectures on current and future processor designs, it is crucial to develop an accurate evaluation methodology for them. This paper presents FAME, a new evaluation methodology aimed to fairly measure the performance of multithreaded processors executing multiprogrammed workloads. FAME reexecutes all programs in the workload until all of them are fairly represented in the final measurements taken. We compare FAME with previously used methodologies showing that it provides more accurate measurements, becoming an ideal evaluation methodology to analyze proposals for multithreaded architectures.

Current operating systems (OS) perceive the different contexts of simultaneous multithreaded (SMT) processors as multiple independent processing units, although, in reality, threads executed in these units compete for the same hardware resources. Furthermore, hardware resources are assigned to threads implicitly as determined by the SMT instruction fetch (Ifetch) policy, without the control of the OS. Both factors cause a lack of control over how individual threads are executed, which can frustrate the work of the job scheduler. This presents a problem for general purpose systems, where the OS job scheduler cannot enforce priorities, and also for embedded systems, where it would be difficult to guarantee worst-case execution times. In this paper, we propose a novel strategy that enables a two-way interaction between the OS and the SMT processor and allows the OS to run jobs at a certain percentage of their maximum speed, regardless of the workload in which these jobs are executed. In contrast to previous approaches, our approach enables the OS to run time-critical jobs without dedicating all internal resources to them so that non-time-critical jobs can make significant progress as well and without significantly compromising overall throughput. In fact, our mechanism, in addition to fulfilling OS requirements, achieves 90 percent of the throughput of one of the best currently known fetch policies for SMTs.

In Simultaneous Multithreaded (SMT) architectures most hardware resources are shared between threads. This provides a good cost/performance trade-off which renders these architectures suitable for use in embedded systems. However, since threads share many resources, they also interfere with each other. As a result, execution times of applications become highly unpredictable and dependent on the context in which an application is executed. Obviously, this poses problems if an SMT is to be used in a real-time system.In this paper, we propose two novel hardware mechanisms that can be used to reduce this performance variability. In contrast to previous approaches, our proposed mechanisms do not need any information beyond the information already known by traditional job schedulers. Nor do they require extensive profiling of workloads to determine optimal schedules. Our mechanisms are based on dynamic resource partitioning. The OS level job scheduler needs to be slightly adapted in order to provide the hardware resource allocator some information on how this resource partitioning needs to be done. We show that our mechanisms provide high stability for SMT architectures to be used in real-time systems: the real time benchmarks we used meet their deadlines in more than 98% of the cases considered while the other thread in the workload still achieves high throughput.

In a simultaneous multithreaded (SMT) architecture, the front end of a superscalar is adapted in order to be able to fetch from several threads while the back end is shared among the threads. In this paper, we describe different resource sharing models in SMT processors. We show that explicit resource allocation can improve SMT performance. In addition, it enables SMTs to solve other QoS requirements, not realizable before.

Summary form only given. Simultaneous multithreading (SMT) processors increase performance by executing instructions from multiple threads simultaneously. These threads share the processor's resources, but also compete for them. In this environment, a thread missing in the L2 cache may allocate a large number of resources for a long time, causing other threads to run much slower than they could. To prevent this problem we should know in advance if a thread is going to miss in the L2 cache. L1 misses are a clear indicator of a possible L2 miss. However, to stall a thread on every L1 miss is too severe, because not all L1 misses lead to an L2 miss, and this would cause an unnecessary stall and resource under-use. Also, to wait until an L2 miss is declared and squash the thread to free up the allocated resources is too expensive in terms of complexity and reexecuted instructions. We propose a novel fetch policy, which we call DWarn. DWarn uses L1 misses as indicators of L2 misses, giving higher priority to threads with no outstanding L1 misses. DWarn acts on L1 misses, before L2 misses happen in a controlled manner to reduce resource under-use and to avoid harming a thread when L1 misses do not lead to L2 misses. Our results show that DWarn outperforms previously proposed policies, in both throughput and fairness, while requiring fewer resources and avoiding instruction reexecution.

SMT processors increase performance by executing instructions from several threads simultaneously. These threads use the resources of the processor better by sharing them but, at the same time, threads are competing for these resources. The way critical resources are distributed among threads determines the final performance. Currently, processor resources are distributed among threads as determined by the fetch policy that decides which threads enter the processor to compete for resources. However, current fetch policies only use indirect indicators of resource usage in their decision, which can lead to resource monopolization by a single thread or to resource waste when no thread can use them. Both situations can harm performance and happen, for example, after an L2 cache miss. In this paper, we introduce the concept of dynamic resource control in SMT processors. Using this concept, we propose a novel resource allocation policy for SMT processors. This policy directly monitors the usage of resources by each thread and guarantees that all threads get their fair share of the critical shared resources, avoiding monopolization. We also define a mechanism to allow a thread to borrow resources from another thread if that thread does not require them, thereby reducing resource under-use. Simulation results show that our dynamic resource allocation policy outperforms a static resource allocation policy by 8%, on average. It also improves the best dynamic resource-conscious fetch policies like FLUSH++ by 4%, on average, using the harmonic mean as a metric. This indicates that our policy does not obtain the ILP boost by unfairly running high ILP threads over slow memory-bounded threads. Instead, it achieves a better throughput-fairness balance.