Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Karol Gregor

dblp:51/7660 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
18ranked-venue papers
7as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 18 · 7 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
17 papers
Reinforcement learning · 32% Generative modeling · 17% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 15%
Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 50% Audio and music processing · 50%

Topics — the 30 heaviest of 39, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
generalization in reinforcement learning
0.712023
Human-Timescale Adaptation in an Open-Ended Task Space · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › meta-reinforcement learning
in-context reinforcement learning
0.712023
Human-Timescale Adaptation in an Open-Ended Task Space · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
meta-reinforcement learning
0.712023
Human-Timescale Adaptation in an Open-Ended Task Space · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
zero-shot transfer
0.712023
Human-Timescale Adaptation in an Open-Ended Task Space · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder
0.622019
Temporal Difference Variational Auto-Encoder · ICLR 2019
DRAW: A Recurrent Neural Network For Image Generation · ICML 2015
Machine learning › Generative modeling
autoregressive model
0.522016
Neural Autoregressive Distribution Estimation · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
MADE: Masked Autoencoder for Distribution Estimation · ICML 2015
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
density estimation
0.522016
Neural Autoregressive Distribution Estimation · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
MADE: Masked Autoencoder for Distribution Estimation · ICML 2015
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model
0.422016
Towards Conceptual Compression · NIPS 2016
Neural Variational Inference and Learning in Belief Networks · ICML 2014
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty › partially observable markov decision process
belief state learning
0.412019
Shaping Belief States with Generative Environment Models for RL · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › model-based reinforcement learning
environment model
0.412019
Shaping Belief States with Generative Environment Models for RL · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning
0.412019
Shaping Belief States with Generative Environment Models for RL · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-free reinforcement learning
0.412019
An Investigation of Model-Free Planning · ICML 2019
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
search-based planning
0.412019
An Investigation of Model-Free Planning · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
associative memory
0.312018
Learning Attractor Dynamics for Generative Memory · NeurIPS 2018
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › nonlinear dynamics
attractor dynamics
0.312018
Learning Attractor Dynamics for Generative Memory · NeurIPS 2018
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference
0.322018
Neural Variational Inference and Learning in Belief Networks · ICML 2014
Learning Attractor Dynamics for Generative Memory · NeurIPS 2018
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
sparse coding
0.332012
Structured sparse coding via lateral inhibition · NIPS 2011
Learning Fast Approximations of Sparse Coding · ICML 2010
Fast Approximations to Structured Sparse Coding and Applications to Object Classification · ECCV (5) 2012
Machine learning › Generative modeling › autoregressive model
autoregressive density estimation
0.212016
Neural Autoregressive Distribution Estimation · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
few-shot learning
0.212016
One-Shot Generalization in Deep Generative Models · ICML 2016
Machine learning › Generative modeling › variational autoencoder
hierarchical latent variable model
0.212016
Towards Conceptual Compression · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning
masked autoencoder
0.212015
MADE: Masked Autoencoder for Distribution Estimation · ICML 2015
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value function approximation
0.212015
Universal Value Function Approximators · ICML 2015
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
curriculum learning
0.212023
Human-Timescale Adaptation in an Open-Ended Task Space · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference › amortized inference
amortized variational inference
0.212014
Neural Variational Inference and Learning in Belief Networks · ICML 2014
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › bayesian network
sigmoid belief network
0.212014
Neural Variational Inference and Learning in Belief Networks · ICML 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience
0.112012
A lattice filter model of the visual pathway · NIPS 2012
Audio and music processing
lattice filter
0.112012
A lattice filter model of the visual pathway · NIPS 2012
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › object recognition
object classification
0.112012
Fast Approximations to Structured Sparse Coding and Applications to Object Classification · ECCV (5) 2012
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › sparse coding
dictionary learning
0.112011
Structured sparse coding via lateral inhibition · NIPS 2011
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › sparse coding
structured sparse representation
0.112011
Structured sparse coding via lateral inhibition · NIPS 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large-scale training · 0.7automated curriculum · 0.7attention-based memory · 0.7variational inference · 0.5variational lower bound · 0.4temporal difference learning · 0.4generative model · 0.4end-to-end training · 0.4convolutional network · 0.4LSTM · 0.4hebbian learning · 0.3structured sparse coding · 0.1approximation algorithm · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Human-Timescale Adaptation in an Open-Ended Task Space
abstract
Foundation models have shown impressive adaptation and scalability in supervised and self-supervised learning problems, but so far these successes have not fully translated to reinforcement learning (RL). In this work, we demonstrate that training an RL agent at scale leads to a general in-context learning algorithm that can adapt to open-ended novel embodied 3D problems as quickly as humans. In a vast space of held-out environment dynamics, our adaptive agent (AdA) displays on-the-fly hypothesis-driven exploration, efficient exploitation of acquired knowledge, and can successfully be prompted with first-person demonstrations. Adaptation emerges from three ingredients: (1) meta-reinforcement learning across a vast, smooth and diverse task distribution, (2) a policy parameterised as a large-scale attention-based memory architecture, and (3) an effective automated curriculum that prioritises tasks at the frontier of an agent’s capabilities. We demonstrate characteristic scaling laws with respect to network size, memory length, and richness of the training task distribution. We believe our results lay the foundation for increasingly general and adaptive RL agents that perform well across ever-larger open-ended domains.
Jakob Bauer, Kate Baumli, Feryal M. P. Behbahani, Avishkar Bhoopchand, Nathalie Bradley-Schmieg, Natalie Clay, Adrian Collister, Vibhavari Dasagi, Lucy Gonzalez, Karol Gregor, Edward Hughes 0001, Sheleem Kashem, Maria Loks-Thompson, Hannah Openshaw, Jack Parker-Holder, Shreya Pathak, Nicolas Perez Nieves, Nemanja Rakicevic, Tim Rocktäschel, Yannick Schroecker, Satinder Singh 0001, Jakub Sygnowski, Karl Tuyls, Sarah York, Alexander Zacherl, Lei M. Zhang
ICML11
2019 Temporal Difference Variational Auto-Encoder
Karol Gregor, George Papamakarios, Frederic Besse, Lars Buesing, Theophane Weber
ICLR1
2019 An Investigation of Model-Free Planning
abstract
The field of reinforcement learning (RL) is facing increasingly challenging domains with combinatorial complexity. For an RL agent to address these challenges, it is essential that it can plan effectively. Prior work has typically utilized an explicit model of the environment, combined with a specific planning algorithm (such as tree search). More recently, a new family of methods have been proposed that learn how to plan, by providing the structure for planning via an inductive bias in the function approximator (such as a tree structured neural network), trained end-to-end by a model-free RL algorithm. In this paper, we go even further, and demonstrate empirically that an entirely model-free approach, without special structure beyond standard neural network components such as convolutional networks and LSTMs, can learn to exhibit many of the characteristics typically associated with a model-based planner. We measure our agent’s effectiveness at planning in terms of its ability to generalize across a combinatorial and irreversible state space, its data efficiency, and its ability to utilize additional thinking time. We find that our agent has many of the characteristics that one might expect to find in a planning algorithm. Furthermore, it exceeds the state-of-the-art in challenging combinatorial domains such as Sokoban and outperforms other model-free approaches that utilize strong inductive biases toward planning.
Arthur Guez, Mehdi Mirza, Karol Gregor, Rishabh Kabra, Sébastien Racanière, Theophane Weber, David Raposo, Adam Santoro, Laurent Orseau, Tom Eccles, Greg Wayne, David Silver 0001, Timothy P. Lillicrap
ICML3
2019 Shaping Belief States with Generative Environment Models for RL
abstract
When agents interact with a complex environment, they must form and maintain beliefs about the relevant aspects of that environment. We propose a way to efficiently train expressive generative models in complex environments. We show that a predictive algorithm with an expressive generative model can form stable belief-states in visually rich and dynamic 3D environments. More precisely, we show that the learned representation captures the layout of the environment as well as the position and orientation of the agent. Our experiments show that the model substantially improves data-efficiency on a number of reinforcement learning (RL) tasks compared with strong model-free baseline agents. We find that predicting multiple steps into the future (overshooting), in combination with an expressive generative model, is critical for stable representations to emerge. In practice, using expressive generative models in RL is computationally expensive and we propose a scheme to reduce this computational burden, allowing us to build agents that are competitive with model-free baselines.
Karol Gregor, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Frederic Besse, Yan Wu 0010, Hamza Merzic, Aäron van den Oord
NeurIPS1
2018 Learning Attractor Dynamics for Generative Memory
abstract
A central challenge faced by memory systems is the robust retrieval of a stored pattern in the presence of interference due to other stored patterns and noise. A theoretically well-founded solution to robust retrieval is given by attractor dynamics, which iteratively cleans up patterns during recall. However, incorporating attractor dynamics into modern deep learning systems poses difficulties: attractor basins are characterised by vanishing gradients, which are known to make training neural networks difficult. In this work, we exploit recent advances in variational inference and avoid the vanishing gradient problem by training a generative distributed memory with a variational lower-bound-based Lyapunov function. The model is minimalistic with surprisingly few parameters. Experiments shows it converges to correct patterns upon iterative retrieval and achieves competitive performance as both a memory model and a generative model.
Yan Wu 0010, Greg Wayne, Karol Gregor, Timothy P. Lillicrap
NeurIPS3
2016 One-Shot Generalization in Deep Generative Models
abstract
Humans have an impressive ability to reason about new concepts and experiences from just a single example. In particular, humans have an ability for one-shot generalization: an ability to encounter a new concept, understand its structure, and then be able to generate compelling alternative variations of the concept. We develop machine learning systems with this important capacity by developing new deep generative models, models that combine the representational power of deep learning with the inferential power of Bayesian reasoning. We develop a class of sequential generative models that are built on the principles of feedback and attention. These two characteristics lead to generative models that are among the state-of-the art in density estimation and image generation. We demonstrate the one-shot generalization ability of our models using three tasks: unconditional sampling, generating new exemplars of a given concept, and generating new exemplars of a family of concepts. In all cases our models are able to generate compelling and diverse samples—having seen new examples just once—providing an important class of general-purpose models for one-shot machine learning.
Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Shakir Mohamed, Ivo Danihelka, Karol Gregor, Daan Wierstra
ICML4
2016 Towards Conceptual Compression
abstract
We introduce convolutional DRAW, a homogeneous deep generative model achieving state-of-the-art performance in latent variable image modeling. The algorithm naturally stratifies information into higher and lower level details, creating abstract features and as such addressing one of the fundamentally desired properties of representation learning. Furthermore, the hierarchical ordering of its latents creates the opportunity to selectively store global information about an image, yielding a high quality 'conceptual compression' framework.
Karol Gregor, Frederic Besse, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Ivo Danihelka, Daan Wierstra
NIPS1
2016 Neural Autoregressive Distribution Estimation
abstract
We present Neural Autoregressive Distribution Estimation (NADE) models, which are neural network architectures applied to the problem of unsupervised distribution and density estimation. They leverage the probability product rule and a weight sharing scheme inspired from restricted Boltzmann machines, to yield an estimator that is both tractable and has good generalization performance. We discuss how they achieve competitive performance in modeling both binary and real-valued observations. We also present how deep NADE models can be trained to be agnostic to the ordering of input dimensions used by the autoregressive product rule decomposition. Finally, we also show how to exploit the topological structure of pixels in images using a deep convolutional architecture for NADE.
Benigno Uria, Marc-Alexandre Côté, Karol Gregor, Iain Murray 0001, Hugo Larochelle
J. Mach. Learn. Res.3
2015 MADE: Masked Autoencoder for Distribution Estimation
abstract
There has been a lot of recent interest in designing neural network models to estimate a distribution from a set of examples. We introduce a simple modification for autoencoder neural networks that yields powerful generative models. Our method masks the autoencoder’s parameters to respect autoregressive constraints: each input is reconstructed only from previous inputs in a given ordering. Constrained this way, the autoencoder outputs can be interpreted as a set of conditional probabilities, and their product, the full joint probability. We can also train a single network that can decompose the joint probability in multiple different orderings. Our simple framework can be applied to multiple architectures, including deep ones. Vectorized implementations, such as on GPUs, are simple and fast. Experiments demonstrate that this approach is competitive with state-of-the-art tractable distribution estimators. At test time, the method is significantly faster and scales better than other autoregressive estimators.
Mathieu Germain, Karol Gregor, Iain Murray 0001, Hugo Larochelle
ICML2
2015 DRAW: A Recurrent Neural Network For Image Generation
abstract
This paper introduces the Deep Recurrent Attentive Writer (DRAW) architecture for image generation with neural networks. DRAW networks combine a novel spatial attention mechanism that mimics the foveation of the human eye, with a sequential variational auto-encoding framework that allows for the iterative construction of complex images. The system substantially improves on the state of the art for generative models on MNIST, and, when trained on the Street View House Numbers dataset, it is able to generate images that are indistinguishable from real data with the naked eye.
Karol Gregor, Ivo Danihelka, Alex Graves, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Daan Wierstra
ICML1
2015 Universal Value Function Approximators
abstract
Value functions are a core component of reinforcement learning. The main idea is to to construct a single function approximator V(s; theta) that estimates the long-term reward from any state s, using parameters θ. In this paper we introduce universal value function approximators (UVFAs) V(s,g;theta) that generalise not just over states s but also over goals g. We develop an efficient technique for supervised learning of UVFAs, by factoring observed values into separate embedding vectors for state and goal, and then learning a mapping from s and g to these factored embedding vectors. We show how this technique may be incorporated into a reinforcement learning algorithm that updates the UVFA solely from observed rewards. Finally, we demonstrate that a UVFA can successfully generalise to previously unseen goals.
Tom Schaul, Daniel Horgan, Karol Gregor, David Silver 0001
ICML3
2014 Deep AutoRegressive Networks
abstract
We introduce a deep, generative autoencoder capable of learning hierarchies of distributed representations from data. Successive deep stochastic hidden layers are equipped with autoregressive connections, which enable the model to be sampled from quickly and exactly via ancestral sampling. We derive an efficient approximate parameter estimation method based on the minimum description length (MDL) principle, which can be seen as maximising a variational lower bound on the log-likelihood, with a feedforward neural network implementing approximate inference. We demonstrate state-of-the-art generative performance on a number of classic data sets: several UCI data sets, MNIST and Atari 2600 games.
Karol Gregor, Ivo Danihelka, Andriy Mnih, Charles Blundell, Daan Wierstra
ICML1
2014 Neural Variational Inference and Learning in Belief Networks
abstract
Highly expressive directed latent variable models, such as sigmoid belief networks, are difficult to train on large datasets because exact inference in them is intractable and none of the approximate inference methods that have been applied to them scale well. We propose a fast non-iterative approximate inference method that uses a feedforward network to implement efficient exact sampling from the variational posterior. The model and this inference network are trained jointly by maximizing a variational lower bound on the log-likelihood. Although the naive estimator of the inference network gradient is too high-variance to be useful, we make it practical by applying several straightforward model-independent variance reduction techniques. Applying our approach to training sigmoid belief networks and deep autoregressive networks, we show that it outperforms the wake-sleep algorithm on MNIST and achieves state-of-the-art results on the Reuters RCV1 document dataset.
Andriy Mnih, Karol Gregor
ICML2
2012 Fast Approximations to Structured Sparse Coding and Applications to Object Classification
Arthur Szlam, Karol Gregor, Yann LeCun
ECCV (5)2
2012 A lattice filter model of the visual pathway
abstract
Early stages of visual processing are thought to decorrelate, or whiten, the incoming temporally varying signals. Because the typical correlation time of natural stimuli, as well as the extent of temporal receptive fields of lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) neurons, is much greater than neuronal time constants, such decorrelation must be done in stages combining contributions of multiple neurons. We propose to model temporal decorrelation in the visual pathway with the lattice filter, a signal processing device for stage-wise decorrelation of temporal signals. The stage-wise architecture of the lattice filter maps naturally onto the visual pathway (photoreceptors -> bipolar cells -> retinal ganglion cells -> LGN) and its filter weights can be learned using Hebbian rules in a stage-wise sequential manner. Moreover, predictions of neural activity from the lattice filter model are consistent with physiological measurements in LGN neurons and fruit fly second-order visual neurons. Therefore, the lattice filter model is a useful abstraction that may help unravel visual system function.
Karol Gregor, Dmitri B. Chklovskii
NIPS1
2011 Structured sparse coding via lateral inhibition
abstract
This work describes a conceptually simple method for structured sparse coding and dictionary design. Supposing a dictionary with K atoms, we introduce a structure as a set of penalties or interactions between every pair of atoms. We describe modifications of standard sparse coding algorithms for inference in this setting, and describe experiments showing that these algorithms are efficient. We show that interesting dictionaries can be learned for interactions that encode tree structures or locally connected structures. Finally, we show that our framework allows us to learn the values of the interactions from the data, rather than having them pre-specified.
Arthur Szlam, Karol Gregor, Yann LeCun
NIPS2
2010 Learning Fast Approximations of Sparse Coding
Karol Gregor, Yann LeCun
ICML1
2010 Learning Convolutional Feature Hierarchies for Visual Recognition
abstract
We propose an unsupervised method for learning multi-stage hierarchies of sparse convolutional features. While sparse coding has become an increasingly popular method for learning visual features, it is most often trained at the patch level. Applying the resulting filters convolutionally results in highly redundant codes because overlapping patches are encoded in isolation. By training convolutionally over large image windows, our method reduces the redudancy between feature vectors at neighboring locations and improves the efficiency of the overall representation. In addition to a linear decoder that reconstructs the image from sparse features, our method trains an efficient feed-forward encoder that predicts quasi-sparse features from the input. While patch-based training rarely produces anything but oriented edge detectors, we show that convolutional training produces highly diverse filters, including center-surround filters, corner detectors, cross detectors, and oriented grating detectors. We show that using these filters in multi-stage convolutional network architecture improves performance on a number of visual recognition and detection tasks.
Koray Kavukcuoglu, Pierre Sermanet, Y-Lan Boureau, Karol Gregor, Michaël Mathieu, Yann LeCun
NIPS4