EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jan Overgoor
dblp:51/8672
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 4 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 3 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 3 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Web and social media mining · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
choice modeling |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Scaling Choice Models of Relational Social Data · KDD 2020 |
Computational social science and digital humanities
social network analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Scaling Choice Models of Relational Social Data · KDD 2020 |
Web and social media mining
discrete choice model |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Choosing to Grow a Graph: Modeling Network Formation as Discrete Choice · WWW 2019 |
Web and social media mining › social network analysis
network formation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Choosing to Grow a Graph: Modeling Network Formation as Discrete Choice · WWW 2019 |
Web and social media mining
social network analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Choosing to Grow a Graph: Modeling Network Formation as Discrete Choice · WWW 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
negative sampling · 0.9importance sampling · 0.9expectation-maximization · 0.4conditional multinomial logit · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | The Structure of U.S. College Networks on Facebook
Jan Overgoor, Bogdan State, Lada A. Adamic |
ICWSM | 1 |
| 2020 | Scaling Choice Models of Relational Social DataabstractMany prediction problems on social networks, from recommendations to anomaly detection, can be approached by modeling network data as a sequence of relational events and then leveraging the resulting model for prediction. Conditional logit models of discrete choice are a natural approach to modeling relational events as "choices'' in a framework that envelops and extends many long-studied models of network formation. The conditional logit model is simplistic, but it is particularly attractive because it allows for efficient consistent likelihood maximization via negative sampling, something that isn't true for mixed logit and many other richer models. The value of negative sampling is particularly pronounced because choice sets in relational data are often enormous. Given the importance of negative sampling, in this work we introduce a model simplification technique for mixed logit models that we call "de-mixing'', whereby standard mixture models of network formation---particularly models that mix local and global link formation---are reformulated to operate their modes over disjoint choice sets. This reformulation reduces mixed logit models to conditional logit models, opening the door to negative sampling while also circumventing other standard challenges with maximizing mixture model likelihoods. To further improve scalability, we also study importance sampling for more efficiently selecting negative samples, finding that it can greatly speed up inference in both standard and de-mixed models. Together, these steps make it possible to much more realistically model network formation in very large graphs. We illustrate the relative gains of our improvements on synthetic datasets with known ground truth as well as a large-scale dataset of public transactions on the Venmo platform. Jan Overgoor, George Pakapol Supaniratisai, Johan Ugander |
KDD | 1 |
| 2019 | Choosing to Grow a Graph: Modeling Network Formation as Discrete ChoiceabstractWe provide a framework for modeling social network formation through conditional multinomial logit models from discrete choice and random utility theory, in which each new edge is viewed as a “choice” made by a node to connect to another node, based on (generic) features of the other nodes available to make a connection. This perspective on network formation unifies existing models such as preferential attachment, triadic closure, and node fitness, which are all special cases, and thereby provides a flexible means for conceptualizing, estimating, and comparing models. The lens of discrete choice theory also provides several new tools for analyzing social network formation; for example, the significance of node features can be evaluated in a statistically rigorous manner, and mixtures of existing models can be estimated by adapting known expectation-maximization algorithms. We demonstrate the flexibility of our framework through examples that analyze a number of synthetic and real-world datasets. For example, we provide rigorous methods for estimating preferential attachment models and show how to separate the effects of preferential attachment and triadic closure. Non-parametric estimates of the importance of degree show a highly linear trend, and we expose the importance of looking carefully at nodes with degree zero. Examining the formation of a large citation graph, we find evidence for an increased role of degree when accounting for age. Jan Overgoor, Austin R. Benson, Johan Ugander |
WWW | 1 |
| 2012 | Trust Propagation with Mixed-Effects Models
Jan Overgoor, Ellery Wulczyn, Christopher Potts |
ICWSM | 1 |
| 2010 | A Story to Go, Please
Frank Nack, Abdallah El Ali, Philo van Kemenade, Jan Overgoor, Bastiaan van der Weij |
ICIDS | 4 |