Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Flaviu Roman

dblp:51/9323 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 77% Interaction techniques and input · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing › knowledge management
knowledge sharing
0.212013
Complementarity of input devices to achieve knowledge sharing in meetings · CSCW 2013
Interaction techniques and input
input device
0.012013
Complementarity of input devices to achieve knowledge sharing in meetings · CSCW 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

exploratory study · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Complementarity of input devices to achieve knowledge sharing in meetings
abstract
In co-located meetings, participants create and share content to establish a common understanding. In this paper, we present a collaborative environment that enables group members to create and share content simultaneously by providing them with different kinds of individual input devices and a shared workspace. We also report on an exploratory study to investigate the influence of the input device used on the shared knowledge produced by the group. The results suggest that driven by the affordances, various input devices complement each other. We thus recommend groups to be equipped with multitude of them to support diverse meeting task demands. Additionally, we observed that groupware usage differs across various phases of the problem-solving activity. This provides implications for the design of collaborative environments to assist each of the respective phases of the task, in order to extend their usefulness for the group.
Himanshu Verma 0001, Flaviu Roman, Silvia Magrelli, Patrick Jermann, Pierre Dillenbourg
CSCW2
2012 Can a table regulate participation in top level managers' meetings?
abstract
We present a longitudinal study on the participation regulation effects in the presence of a speech aware interactive table. This study focuses on training meetings of groups of top level managers, whose compositions do not change, in a corporate organization. We show that an effect of balancing participation develops over time. We also report other emerging group-specific features such as interaction patterns and signatures, leadership effects, and behavioral changes between meetings. Finally we collect feedback from the participants and analyze qualitatively the human and social aspects of the participants interaction mediated by the technology.
Flaviu Roman, Stefano Mastrogiacomo, Dyna Mlotkowski, Frédéric Kaplan, Pierre Dillenbourg
GROUP1
2012 Group dynamics findings from coordination in problem solving and decision making meetings
abstract
We present the results of group dynamics and their effect on success in problem solving/decision making meetings. We use a novel multiple input environment for collaboration and data collection, and a hidden profile task given to groups, whose goals are to find the correct solution. We observe that groups elect 0, 1 or 2 leaders, and the best results are obtained by the groups with a single leader. Prior acquaintance (familiarity), does not show any effect on the success or on the group strategies. Groups with a single leader tend to be more successful, and leaders expressed their authority verbally rather than by through the collaborative system.
Flaviu Roman, Himanshu Verma 0001, Patrick Jermann, Pierre Dillenbourg
GROUP1