Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Roberto Oliveira 0001
dblp:51/934 · also Roberto I. Oliveira 0001, Roberto Imbuzeiro Moraes Felinto de Oliveira, Roberto Imbuzeiro Oliveira
· DBLP profile ↗
12ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-1064-3398ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Theory of computation · 3 · 1 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 68% Segmentation and scene understanding · 24% Learning theory · 8% | |
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 46% Algorithms and data structures · 31% Mathematical optimization · 23% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 100% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
conformal prediction |
1.0 | 2 | 2024 | Split Conformal Prediction and Non-Exchangeable Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 AmnioML: Amniotic Fluid Segmentation and Volume Prediction with Uncertainty Quantification · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
1.0 | 2 | 2024 | Split Conformal Prediction and Non-Exchangeable Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 AmnioML: Amniotic Fluid Segmentation and Volume Prediction with Uncertainty Quantification · AAAI 2023 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
medical image segmentation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | AmnioML: Amniotic Fluid Segmentation and Volume Prediction with Uncertainty Quantification · AAAI 2023 |
Algorithms and data structures › sublinear algorithms › sublinear-time algorithms
graph parameter estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Estimating graph parameters via random walks with restarts · SODA 2018 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › centrality › pagerank
personalized pagerank |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Estimating graph parameters via random walks with restarts · SODA 2018 |
Algorithms and data structures › sublinear algorithms
sublinear-time algorithms |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Estimating graph parameters via random walks with restarts · SODA 2018 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph algorithms |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Solving SDPs for synchronization and MaxCut problems via the Grothendieck inequality · COLT 2017 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph cut
max-cut |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Solving SDPs for synchronization and MaxCut problems via the Grothendieck inequality · COLT 2017 |
Mathematical optimization
semidefinite programming |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Solving SDPs for synchronization and MaxCut problems via the Grothendieck inequality · COLT 2017 |
Mathematical optimization › dynamical systems
synchronization problems |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Solving SDPs for synchronization and MaxCut problems via the Grothendieck inequality · COLT 2017 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory
VC theory |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Exceptional rotations of random graphs: a VC theory · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2015 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
random graphs |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Exceptional rotations of random graphs: a VC theory · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2015 |
Algorithms and data structures › markov chains
mixing time |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Estimating graph parameters via random walks with restarts · SODA 2018 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography
digital signatures |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | On the Generic Insecurity of the Full Domain Hash · CRYPTO 2005 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › digital signatures › hash-and-sign signatures
full domain hash |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | On the Generic Insecurity of the Full Domain Hash · CRYPTO 2005 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
hash functions |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | On the Generic Insecurity of the Full Domain Hash · CRYPTO 2005 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
random oracle model |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | On the Generic Insecurity of the Full Domain Hash · CRYPTO 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
deep learning · 1.3conformal prediction · 1.3decoupling · 0.8concentration inequalities · 0.8probabilistic method · 0.4VC dimension · 0.4random walk · 0.3intersection counting · 0.3riemannian trust-region method · 0.3grothendieck inequality · 0.3burer-monteiro factorization · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | BlockBoost: Scalable and Efficient Blocking through BoostingabstractAs datasets grow larger, matching and merging entries from different databases has become a costly task in modern data pipelines. To avoid expensive comparisons between entries, blocking similar items is a popular preprocessing step. In this paper, we introduce BlockBoost, a novel boosting-based method that generates compact binary hash codes for database entries, through which blocking can be performed efficiently. The algorithm is fast and scalable, resulting in computational costs that are orders of magnitude lower than current benchmarks. Unlike existing alternatives, BlockBoost comes with associated feature importance measures for interpretability, and possesses strong theoretical guarantees, including lower bounds on critical performance metrics like recall and reduction ratio. Finally, we show that BlockBoost delivers great empirical results, outperforming state-of-the-art blocking benchmarks in terms of both performance metrics and computational cost. Thiago Ramos, Rodrigo Schuller, Alex Akira Okuno, Lucas Nissenbaum, Roberto Oliveira 0001, Paulo Orenstein |
AISTATS | 5 |
| 2024 | Split Conformal Prediction and Non-Exchangeable DataabstractSplit conformal prediction (CP) is arguably the most popular CP method for uncertainty quantification, enjoying both academic interest and widespread deployment. However, the original theoretical analysis of split CP makes the crucial assumption of data exchangeability, which hinders many real-world applications. In this paper, we present a novel theoretical framework based on concentration inequalities and decoupling properties of the data, proving that split CP remains valid for many non-exchangeable processes by adding a small coverage penalty. Through experiments with both real and synthetic data, we show that our theoretical results translate to good empirical performance under non-exchangeability, e.g., for time series and spatiotemporal data. Compared to recent conformal algorithms designed to counter specific exchangeability violations, we show that split CP is competitive in terms of coverage and interval size, with the benefit of being extremely simple and orders of magnitude faster than alternatives. Roberto Oliveira 0001, Paulo Orenstein, Thiago Ramos, João Vitor Romano |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2023 | AmnioML: Amniotic Fluid Segmentation and Volume Prediction with Uncertainty QuantificationabstractAccurately predicting the volume of amniotic fluid is fundamental to assessing pregnancy risks, though the task usually requires many hours of laborious work by medical experts. In this paper, we present AmnioML, a machine learning solution that leverages deep learning and conformal prediction to output fast and accurate volume estimates and segmentation masks from fetal MRIs with Dice coefficient over 0.9. Also, we make available a novel, curated dataset for fetal MRIs with 853 exams and benchmark the performance of many recent deep learning architectures. In addition, we introduce a conformal prediction tool that yields narrow predictive intervals with theoretically guaranteed coverage, thus aiding doctors in detecting pregnancy risks and saving lives. A successful case study of AmnioML deployed in a medical setting is also reported. Real-world clinical benefits include up to 20x segmentation time reduction, with most segmentations deemed by doctors as not needing any further manual refinement. Furthermore, AmnioML's volume predictions were found to be highly accurate in practice, with mean absolute error below 56mL and tight predictive intervals, showcasing its impact in reducing pregnancy complications. Daniel Csillag, Lucas Monteiro Paes, Thiago Ramos, João Vitor Romano, Rodrigo Schuller, Roberto de Beauclair Seixas, Roberto Oliveira 0001, Paulo Orenstein |
AAAI | 7 |
| 2022 | ExactBoost: Directly Boosting the Margin in Combinatorial and Non-decomposable MetricsabstractMany classification algorithms require the use of surrogate losses when the intended loss function is combinatorial or non-decomposable. This paper introduces a fast and exact stagewise optimization algorithm, dubbed ExactBoost, that boosts stumps to the actual loss function. By developing a novel extension of margin theory to the non-decomposable setting, it is possible to provably bound the generalization error of ExactBoost for many important metrics with different levels of non-decomposability. Through extensive examples, it is shown that such theoretical guarantees translate to competitive empirical performance. In particular, when used as an ensembler, ExactBoost is able to significantly outperform other surrogate-based and exact algorithms available. Daniel Csillag, Carolina Piazza, Thiago Ramos, João Vitor Romano, Roberto Oliveira 0001, Paulo Orenstein |
AISTATS | 5 |
| 2018 | Estimating graph parameters via random walks with restartsabstractIn this paper we discuss the problem of estimating graph parameters from a random walk with restarts. In this setting, an algorithm observes the trajectory of a random walk over an unknown graph G, starting from a vertex x. The algorithm also sees the degrees along the trajectory. The only other power that the algorithm has is to request that the random walk be reset to its initial state at any given time, based on what it has seen so far. Our main results are as follows. For regular graphs G, one can estimate the number of vertices nG and the ℓ2 mixing time of G from x in steps, where is the uniform mixing time of the random walk on G. The algorithm is based on the number of intersections of random walk paths X, Y, ie. the number of times (t, s) such that Xt = Ys. Our method improves on previous methods by various authors which only consider collisions (ie. times t with Xt = Yt). We also show that the time complexity of our algorithm is optimal (up to log factors) for 3-regular graphs with prescribed mixing times. For general graphs, we adapt the intersections algorithm to compute the number of edges mG and the ℓ2 mixing time from the starting vertex x in steps. Under mild additional assumptions (which hold e.g. for sparse graphs) the number of vertices can also be estimated by this time. Finally, we show that these algorithms, which may take sublinear time, have a fundamental limitation: it is not possible to devise a sublinear stopping time at which one can be reasonably sure that our parameters are well estimated. On the other hand, we show that, given either ma or the mixing time of G, we can compute the “other parameter” with a self-stopping algorithm. Anna Ben-Hamou, Roberto Oliveira 0001, Yuval Peres |
SODA | 2 |
| 2017 | Solving SDPs for synchronization and MaxCut problems via the Grothendieck inequalityabstractA number of statistical estimation problems can be addressed by semidefinite programs (SDP). While SDPs are solvable in polynomial time using interior point methods, in practice generic SDP solvers do not scale well to high-dimensional problems. In order to cope with this problem, Burer and Monteiro proposed a non-convex rank-constrained formulation, which has good performance in practice but is still poorly understood theoretically. In this paper we study the rank-constrained version of SDPs arising in MaxCut and in $\mathbb Z_2$ and $\rm SO(d)$ synchronization problems. We establish a Grothendieck-type inequality that proves that all the local maxima and dangerous saddle points are within a small multiplicative gap from the global maximum. We use this structural information to prove that SDPs can be solved within a known accuracy, by applying the Riemannian trust-region method to this non-convex problem, while constraining the rank to be of order one. For the MaxCut problem, our inequality implies that any local maximizer of the rank-constrained SDP provides a $(1 - 1/(k-1)) \times 0.878$ approximation of the MaxCut, when the rank is fixed to $k$. We then apply our results to data matrices generated according to the Gaussian $\mathbb Z_2$ synchronization problem, and the two-groups stochastic block model with large bounded degree. We prove that the error achieved by local maximizers undergoes a phase transition at the same threshold as for information-theoretically optimal methods. Song Mei, Theodor Misiakiewicz, Andrea Montanari, Roberto Oliveira 0001 |
COLT | 4 |
| 2016 | Applying root-finding techniques to extend Quantized-State-Systems-based solversabstractIn this work we propose the usage of root isolation algorithms to extend Quantized-State-Systems-based methods for integrating systems of Ordinary Differential Equations to higher orders. QSS methods of order n, at their inner loop, neet to compute the minimum positive root of a n-degree polynomial. The lack of analytical expressions for the roots of polynomial of degree greater than four limits the QSS methods to fourth order or less. We make an observation which, combined with the usage of root-finding techniques, allows the generalization to QSS of any order. Moreover, we show experimentally that, considering our algorithmic improvements, higher order methods do require considerably fewer iterations than lower order ones. Eric Biagioli, Federico Bergero, Roberto Oliveira 0001, Luis Peñaranda |
CLEI | 3 |
| 2015 | Exceptional rotations of random graphs: a VC theory
Louigi Addario-Berry, Shankar Bhamidi, Sébastien Bubeck, Luc Devroye, Gábor Lugosi, Roberto Oliveira 0001 |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 6 |
| 2015 | Stochastic Processes With Random Contexts: A Characterization and Adaptive Estimators for the Transition ProbabilitiesabstractThis paper introduces the concept of random context representations for the transition probabilities of a finite-alphabet stochastic process. Processes with these representations generalize context tree processes (also known as variable length Markov chains), and are proved to coincide with processes whose transition probabilities are almost surely continuous functions of the (infinite) past. This is similar to a classical result by Kalikow about continuous transition probabilities. Existence and uniqueness of a minimal random context representation are shown, in the sense that there exists a unique representation that looks into the past as little as possible in order to determine the next symbol. Both this representation and the transition probabilities can be consistently estimated from data, and some finite sample adaptivity properties are also obtained (including an oracle inequality). In particular, the estimator achieves minimax performance, up to logarithmic factors, for the class of binary renewal processes whose arrival distributions have bounded moments of order 2 + γ. Roberto Oliveira 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |
| 2006 | Predicting Conditional Quantiles via Reduction to Classification
John Langford 0001, Roberto Oliveira 0001, Bianca Zadrozny |
UAI | 2 |
| 2005 | On the Generic Insecurity of the Full Domain Hash
Yevgeniy Dodis, Roberto Oliveira 0001, Krzysztof Pietrzak |
CRYPTO | 2 |
| 2004 | Improved Randomness Extraction from Two Independent Sources
Yevgeniy Dodis, Ariel Elbaz, Roberto Oliveira 0001, Ran Raz |
APPROX-RANDOM | 3 |