Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mark A. DePristo

dblp:51/9916 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0001-9928-045XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
out-of-distribution detection
0.412019
Likelihood Ratios for Out-of-Distribution Detection · NeurIPS 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
genomic variant analysis
0.412019
GenomeWarp: an alignment-based variant coordinate transformation · Bioinform. 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequencing data processing
sequencing quality control
0.112011
ContEst: estimating cross-contamination of human samples in next-generation sequencing data · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › genomic data management
variant call format
0.112011
The variant call format and VCFtools · Bioinform. 2011
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
0.112019
Likelihood Ratios for Out-of-Distribution Detection · NeurIPS 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sequence alignment · 0.4likelihood ratio · 0.4deep generative model · 0.4maximum likelihood estimation · 0.1indexing · 0.1in silico mixing · 0.1data compression · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Likelihood Ratios for Out-of-Distribution Detection
abstract
Discriminative neural networks offer little or no performance guarantees when deployed on data not generated by the same process as the training distribution. On such out-of-distribution (OOD) inputs, the prediction may not only be erroneous, but confidently so, limiting the safe deployment of classifiers in real-world applications. One such challenging application is bacteria identification based on genomic sequences, which holds the promise of early detection of diseases, but requires a model that can output low confidence predictions on OOD genomic sequences from new bacteria that were not present in the training data. We introduce a genomics dataset for OOD detection that allows other researchers to benchmark progress on this important problem. We investigate deep generative model based approaches for OOD detection and observe that the likelihood score is heavily affected by population level background statistics. We propose a likelihood ratio method for deep generative models which effectively corrects for these confounding background statistics. We benchmark the OOD detection performance of the proposed method against existing approaches on the genomics dataset and show that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance. Finally, we demonstrate the generality of the proposed method by showing that it significantly improves OOD detection when applied to deep generative models of images.
Jie Ren 0006, Peter J. Liu, Emily Fertig, Jasper Snoek, Ryan Poplin, Mark A. DePristo, Joshua V. Dillon, Balaji Lakshminarayanan
NeurIPS6
2019 GenomeWarp: an alignment-based variant coordinate transformation
abstract
SUMMARY: Reference genomes are refined to reflect error corrections and other improvements. While this process improves novel data generation and analysis, incorporating data analyzed on an older reference genome assembly requires transforming the coordinates and representations of the data to the new assembly. Multiple tools exist to perform this transformation for coordinate-only data types, but none supports accurate transformation of genome-wide short variation. Here we present GenomeWarp, a tool for efficiently transforming variants between genome assemblies. GenomeWarp transforms regions and short variants in a conservative manner to minimize false positive and negative variants in the target genome, and converts over 99% of regions and short variants from a representative human genome. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: GenomeWarp is written in Java. All source code and the user manual are freely available at https://github.com/verilylifesciences/genomewarp. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Cory Y. McLean, Yeongwoo Hwang, Ryan Poplin, Mark A. DePristo
Bioinform.4
2012 Efficiency and Power as a Function of Sequence Coverage, SNP Array Density, and Imputation
abstract
High coverage whole genome sequencing provides near complete information about genetic variation. However, other technologies can be more efficient in some settings by (a) reducing redundant coverage within samples and (b) exploiting patterns of genetic variation across samples. To characterize as many samples as possible, many genetic studies therefore employ lower coverage sequencing or SNP array genotyping coupled to statistical imputation. To compare these approaches individually and in conjunction, we developed a statistical framework to estimate genotypes jointly from sequence reads, array intensities, and imputation. In European samples, we find similar sensitivity (89%) and specificity (99.6%) from imputation with either 1× sequencing or 1 M SNP arrays. Sensitivity is increased, particularly for low-frequency polymorphisms (MAF < 5%), when low coverage sequence reads are added to dense genome-wide SNP arrays--the converse, however, is not true. At sites where sequence reads and array intensities produce different sample genotypes, joint analysis reduces genotype errors and identifies novel error modes. Our joint framework informs the use of next-generation sequencing in genome wide association studies and supports development of improved methods for genotype calling.
Jason Flannick, Joshua M. Korn, Pierre Fontanillas, George B. Grant, Eric Banks, Mark A. DePristo, David Altshuler
PLoS Comput. Biol.6
2011 ContEst: estimating cross-contamination of human samples in next-generation sequencing data
abstract
SUMMARY: Here, we present ContEst, a tool for estimating the level of cross-individual contamination in next-generation sequencing data. We demonstrate the accuracy of ContEst across a range of contamination levels, sources and read depths using sequencing data mixed in silico at known concentrations. We applied our tool to published cancer sequencing datasets and report their estimated contamination levels. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: ContEst is a GATK module, and distributed under a BSD style license at http://www.broadinstitute.org/cancer/cga/contest CONTACT: [email protected]; [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data is available at Bioinformatics online.
Kristian Cibulskis, Aaron McKenna, Tim Fennell, Eric Banks, Mark A. DePristo, Gad Getz
Bioinform.5
2011 The variant call format and VCFtools
abstract
SUMMARY: The variant call format (VCF) is a generic format for storing DNA polymorphism data such as SNPs, insertions, deletions and structural variants, together with rich annotations. VCF is usually stored in a compressed manner and can be indexed for fast data retrieval of variants from a range of positions on the reference genome. The format was developed for the 1000 Genomes Project, and has also been adopted by other projects such as UK10K, dbSNP and the NHLBI Exome Project. VCFtools is a software suite that implements various utilities for processing VCF files, including validation, merging, comparing and also provides a general Perl API. AVAILABILITY: http://vcftools.sourceforge.net
Petr Danecek, Adam Auton, Gonçalo R. Abecasis, Cornelis A. Albers, Eric Banks, Mark A. DePristo, Robert E. Handsaker, Gerton Lunter, Gabor T. Marth, Stephen T. Sherry, Gil McVean, Richard Durbin
Bioinform.6