Mario Pantano

dblp:52/1046 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1999
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Performance modeling and evaluation · 88% Distributed systems · 12%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Compilers and program optimization · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Virtual and augmented reality · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Performance modeling and evaluation
parallel performance evaluation
0.011999
Integrated Range Comparison for Data-Parallel Compilation Systems · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 1999
Performance modeling and evaluation › performance analysis tools
performance visualization
0.011999
An Approach to Immersive Performance Visualization of Parallel and Wide-Area Distributed Applications · HPDC 1999
Virtual and augmented reality
immersive visualization
0.011999
An Approach to Immersive Performance Visualization of Parallel and Wide-Area Distributed Applications · HPDC 1999
Distributed systems › distributed system evaluation
distributed application performance
0.011999
An Approach to Immersive Performance Visualization of Parallel and Wide-Area Distributed Applications · HPDC 1999

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

scalability analysis · 0.0integrated measurement · 0.0crossing point prediction · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1999 An Approach to Immersive Performance Visualization of Parallel and Wide-Area Distributed Applications
abstract
Complex, distributed applications pose new challenges for performance analysis and optimization. This paper outlines an online approach to performance analysis where developers are active participants, using integrated measurement and immersive performance visualization to tune parallel and distributed applications.
Luiz De Rose, Mario Pantano, Ruth A. Aydt, Eric Shaffer, Benjamin Schaeffer, Shannon Whitmore, Daniel A. Reed
HPDC2
1999 Integrated Range Comparison for Data-Parallel Compilation Systems
abstract
A major difficulty in restructuring compilation, and in parallel programming in general, is how to compare parallel performance over a range of system and problem sizes. Execution time varies with system and problem size and an initially fast implementation may become slow when system and problem size scale up. This paper introduces the concept of range comparison. Unlike conventional execution time comparison in which performance is compared for a particular system and problem size, range comparison compares the performance of programs over a range of ensemble and problem sizes via scalability and performance crossing point analysis. A novel algorithm is developed to predict the crossing point automatically. The correctness of the algorithm is proven and a methodology is developed to integrate range comparison into restructuring compilations for data-parallel programming. A preliminary prototype of the methodology is implemented and tested under Vienna Fortran Compilation System. Experimental results demonstrate that range comparison is feasible and effective. It is an important asset for program evaluation, restructuring compilation, and parallel programming.
Xian-He Sun, Mario Pantano, Thomas Fahringer
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.2
1998 Performance Range Comparison for Restructuring Compilation
abstract
A major difficulty in restructuring compilation is how to compare parallel performance over a range of system and problem sizes. This study introduces the concept of range comparison for data-parallel programming. Unlike conventional execution time comparison in which performance is compared for a particular system and problem size, range comparison compares the performance of programs over a range of ensemble and problem sizes via scalability and performance crossing point analysis. An algorithm is developed to predict the crossing point automatically. The correctness of the algorithm is proved and a methodology is developed to integrate range comparison into restructuring compilations. A preliminary prototype of the methodology is implemented and tested under Vienna Fortran Compilation System. Experimental results demonstrate that range comparison is feasible and effective.
Xian-He Sun, Mario Pantano, Thomas Fahringer
ICPP2