EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
L. M. Culpepper
dblp:52/2135
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1975
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 91% Empirical software engineering · 9% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software testing › software reliability
reliability certification |
0.0 | 1 | 1975 | A System for Reliable Engineering Software · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1975 |
Software testing
software reliability |
0.0 | 1 | 1975 | A System for Reliable Engineering Software · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1975 |
Software testing
software validation |
0.0 | 1 | 1975 | A System for Reliable Engineering Software · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1975 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
statistical testing · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1975 | A System for Reliable Engineering SoftwareabstractMuch of the software developed to support engineering design calculations is produced by persons whose primary skill is not that of computer scientist. Software validation techniques suitable for use by these engineer-programmers have been under investigation by the Navy as part of a project designed to increase the reliability, usability, and portability of engineering design software. This paper describes the goals and results of the project and describes the software validation process which was developed. A software validation tool which was produced during the project is described and compared with several other tools. Some areas for further work are suggested. L. M. Culpepper |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 1 |