Andrew Hanlon

dblp:52/231 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software maintenance and evolution · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software maintenance and evolution
software configuration management
0.012004
SubCM: A Tool for Improved Visibility of Software Change in an Industrial Setting · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2004
Software maintenance and evolution
build management
0.012004
SubCM: A Tool for Improved Visibility of Software Change in an Industrial Setting · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

file-based configuration management · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2004 SubCM: A Tool for Improved Visibility of Software Change in an Industrial Setting
abstract
Software configuration management is the discipline of managing large collections of software development artefacts from which software products are built. Software configuration management tools typically deal with artefacts at fine levels of granularity - such as individual source code files - and assist with coordination of changes to such artefacts. This paper describes a lightweight tool, designed to be used on top of a traditional file-based configuration management system. The add-on tool support enables users to flexibly define new hierarchical views of product structure, independent of the underlying artefact-repository structure. The tool extracts configuration and change data with respect to the user-defined hierarchy, leading to improved visibility of how individual subsystems have changed. The approach yields a range of new capabilities for build managers, and verification and validation teams. The paper includes a description of our experience using the tool in an organization that builds large embedded software systems.
Hagen Völzer, Anthony MacDonald, Brenton Atchison, Andrew Hanlon, Peter A. Lindsay, Paul A. Strooper
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.4