Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Wendell Wallach

dblp:52/4905 · also Wendell Arnhold Wallach · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational social science and digital humanities
AI governance
0.412019
Toward the Agile and Comprehensive International Governance of AI and Robotics · Proc. IEEE 2019
Computational social science and digital humanities › public policy
technology policy
0.112019
Toward the Agile and Comprehensive International Governance of AI and Robotics · Proc. IEEE 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

policy analysis · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Toward the Agile and Comprehensive International Governance of AI and Robotics
abstract
Rapidly emerging technologies, such as AI and robotics, present a serious challenge to traditional models of government regulation. These technologies are advancing so quickly that in many sectors, traditional regulation cannot keep up, given the cumbersome procedural and bureaucratic procedures and safeguards that modern legislative and rulemaking processes require. Consequently, regulatory systems will predictively fail to put in place appropriately tailored regulatory measures by the time new applications of fast-moving technologies begin to affect society. Perhaps even worse, if a regulatory system does somehow manage to rush into place new regulations for an emerging technology, they will likely be obsolete by the time the ink dries on the enactment. Given this so-called “pacing problem,” traditional regulatory approaches will either produce no regulation or bad regulation [1].
Wendell Wallach, Gary E. Marchant
Proc. IEEE1