Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael A. Buckley
dblp:52/5649
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1996
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program verification · 67% Requirements engineering and software design · 33% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Logic in computer science · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Requirements engineering and software design › formal specification
formal requirements specification |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | A Logic-Model Semantics for SCR Software Requirements · ISSTA 1996 |
Program verification
model checking |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | A Logic-Model Semantics for SCR Software Requirements · ISSTA 1996 |
Program verification › model checking
temporal logic model checking |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | A Logic-Model Semantics for SCR Software Requirements · ISSTA 1996 |
Logic in computer science
modal logic |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | A Logic-Model Semantics for SCR Software Requirements · ISSTA 1996 |
Logic in computer science
temporal logic |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | A Logic-Model Semantics for SCR Software Requirements · ISSTA 1996 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
symbolic model verification · 0.0model checking · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1996 | A Logic-Model Semantics for SCR Software RequirementsabstractThis paper presents a simple logic-model semantics for Software Cost Reduction (SCR) software requirements. Such a semantics enables model-checking of native SCR requirements and obviates the need to transform the requirements for analysis. The paper also proposes modal-logic abbreviations for expressing conditioned events in temporal-logic formulae. The Symbolic Model Verifier (SMV) is used to verify that an SCR requirements specification enforces desired global requirements, expressed as formulae in the enhanced logic. The properties of a small system (an automobile cruise control system) are verified, including an invariant property that could not be verified previously. The paper concludes with a discussion of how other requirements notations for conditioned-event-driven systems could be similarly checked. Joanne M. Atlee, Michael A. Buckley |
ISSTA | 2 |