Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael A. Buckley

dblp:52/5649 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1996
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program verification · 67% Requirements engineering and software design · 33%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Logic in computer science · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design › formal specification
formal requirements specification
0.011996
A Logic-Model Semantics for SCR Software Requirements · ISSTA 1996
Program verification
model checking
0.011996
A Logic-Model Semantics for SCR Software Requirements · ISSTA 1996
Program verification › model checking
temporal logic model checking
0.011996
A Logic-Model Semantics for SCR Software Requirements · ISSTA 1996
Logic in computer science
modal logic
0.011996
A Logic-Model Semantics for SCR Software Requirements · ISSTA 1996
Logic in computer science
temporal logic
0.011996
A Logic-Model Semantics for SCR Software Requirements · ISSTA 1996

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

symbolic model verification · 0.0model checking · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1996 A Logic-Model Semantics for SCR Software Requirements
abstract
This paper presents a simple logic-model semantics for Software Cost Reduction (SCR) software requirements. Such a semantics enables model-checking of native SCR requirements and obviates the need to transform the requirements for analysis. The paper also proposes modal-logic abbreviations for expressing conditioned events in temporal-logic formulae. The Symbolic Model Verifier (SMV) is used to verify that an SCR requirements specification enforces desired global requirements, expressed as formulae in the enhanced logic. The properties of a small system (an automobile cruise control system) are verified, including an invariant property that could not be verified previously. The paper concludes with a discussion of how other requirements notations for conditioned-event-driven systems could be similarly checked.
Joanne M. Atlee, Michael A. Buckley
ISSTA2