Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mark Harris

dblp:52/6056 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › genetic association study
genetic association study design
0.012003
SNP cherry picker: maximizing the chance of finding an association with a disease SNP · Bioinform. 2003
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › single nucleotide polymorphism analysis
SNP selection
0.012003
SNP cherry picker: maximizing the chance of finding an association with a disease SNP · Bioinform. 2003
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › genotype-phenotype association
disease association
0.012003
SNP cherry picker: maximizing the chance of finding an association with a disease SNP · Bioinform. 2003

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optimization · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Context Beyond Simple Rules: Deploying an Automated NLP-Based Pipeline for Sentiment and Theme Prediction in Paediatric Healthcare Setting
abstract
The National Health Service (NHS) uses the Friends and Family Test (FFT) to gather patient feedback aimed at improving service quality and satisfaction. The current workflow involves FFT feedback processed manually by the Patient Experience team to identify sentiment and theme, which is a time-consuming and unsustainable approach given the large volume of data. To address this, we proposed and implemented a two-phase solution that is adaptable with limited computational resources that has no access to GPUs: (1) training and evaluation of lightweight, fine-tuned transformer-based models using routinely collected, expert-reviewed feedback data, and (2) deployment of these models within an automated pipeline for sentiment prediction and theme classification, involving a human-in-the-loop verification process. Our experiments and results validated on expert-annotated data collected over a period of 3.5 years achieve the best performance with an F1-score of 88.14% in sentiment classification and 71.47% in theme classification. This paper details the implementation, testing, and monitoring of our proposed solution in a paediatric healthcare setting, highlighting the ability to generate near-real-time results. Our deployed solution has substantially decreased the time needed to manually process approximately 2000 feedback pieces each month by delivering automated outcomes daily, a task that previously required several days for completion. In addition, we discuss the broader implications of our findings and potential enhancements for scalable deployment across NHS trusts. Source code will be open-sourced and published here: https://github.com/gosh-dre/FFT-NLP-Pipeline.
Caroline Baumgartner, Ewart Jonny Sheldon, Sebin Sabu, Jaskaran Singh Kawatra, Pavithra Rajendran, Shiren Patel, Mark Harris, Suzanne Collin, Taraben Kapadia
ECAI7
2003 SNP cherry picker: maximizing the chance of finding an association with a disease SNP
abstract
UNLABELLED: The high cost of genotyping single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) generally prohibits the systematic mapping of entire genetic linkage regions in order to find the polymorphisms associated with increased risk of disease. In practice, SNPs are selected at approximately equal spacing across the linkage region to try to locate a SNP lying in the haplotype block of the disease SNP. The size of the haplotype block may not be known, however, and SNPs taken from public domain sources may not in fact be polymorphic. Our program will choose a subset of the SNPs in a linkage region so as to maximize the expected proportion of the sequence that lies within a given distance of a real SNP. AVAILABILITY: The software is available, free of charge, for academic use on request from the authors. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: www.oxagen.co.uk
Mark Harris, Jeremy M. R. Martin, John F. Peden, Christopher J. Rawlings
Bioinform.1