Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Marian G. Williams

dblp:52/6479 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1999
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
User interface design and tools · 77% Interaction techniques and input · 23%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
User interface design and tools
task modeling
0.011999
Comparison of visual and textual languages via task modeling · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 1999
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1999 Comparison of visual and textual languages via task modeling
Marian G. Williams, J. Nicholas Buehler
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud.1
1992 Visualization for knowledge discovery
abstract
Although the fields of data visualization and automated knowledge discovery (AKD) share many goals, workers in each field have been reluctant to adopt the tools and methods of the other field. Many AKD researchers discourage the use of visualization tools because they believe that dependence on human steering will impede the development of numerical or analytical descriptions of complex data. Many visualization researchers are concerned that their present platforms are being pushed to the limits of their performance by the most advanced visualization techniques and are therefore unwilling to incur the perceived overhead of having a database system mediate access to the data. We argue that these attitudes are somewhat short-sighted and that the techniques of these two communities are complementary. We discuss a specific visualization system that we have developed and describe the obstacles that must be overcome in integrating it into an AKD system. © 1992 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Georges G. Grinstein, John C. Sieg Jr., Stuart Smith, Marian G. Williams
Int. J. Intell. Syst.4