Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chun-Nam John Yu
dblp:52/969
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 75% Optimization for machine learning · 25% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › convex optimization
cutting plane methods |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Training structural svms with kernels using sampled cuts · KDD 2008 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Training structural svms with kernels using sampled cuts · KDD 2008 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
large margin methods |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Training structural svms with kernels using sampled cuts · KDD 2008 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › support vector machine
structural SVM training |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Training structural svms with kernels using sampled cuts · KDD 2008 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein sequence analysis
protein alignment |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Support Vector Training of Protein Alignment Models · RECOMB 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
random sampling · 0.1kernel methods · 0.1cutting-plane · 0.1support vector machine · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | Learning structural SVMs with latent variablesabstractWe present a large-margin formulation and algorithm for structured output prediction that allows the use of latent variables. Our proposal covers a large range of application problems, with an optimization problem that can be solved efficiently using Concave-Convex Programming. The generality and performance of the approach is demonstrated through three applications including motiffinding, noun-phrase coreference resolution, and optimizing precision at k in information retrieval. Chun-Nam John Yu, Thorsten Joachims |
ICML | 1 |
| 2009 | Sparse Kernel SVMs via Cutting-Plane Training
Thorsten Joachims, Chun-Nam John Yu |
ECML/PKDD (1) | 2 |
| 2009 | Cutting-plane training of structural SVMs
Thorsten Joachims, Thomas Finley, Chun-Nam John Yu |
Mach. Learn. | 3 |
| 2009 | Sparse kernel SVMs via cutting-plane training
Thorsten Joachims, Chun-Nam John Yu |
Mach. Learn. | 2 |
| 2008 | Training structural svms with kernels using sampled cutsabstractDiscriminative training for structured outputs has found increasing applications in areas such as natural language processing, bioinformatics, information retrieval, and computer vision. Focusing on large-margin methods, the most general (in terms of loss function and model structure) training algorithms known to date are based on cutting-plane approaches. While these algorithms are very efficient for linear models, their training complexity becomes quadratic in the number of examples when kernels are used. To overcome this bottleneck, we propose new training algorithms that use approximate cutting planes and random sampling to enable efficient training with kernels. We prove that these algorithms have improved time complexity while providing approximation guarantees. In empirical evaluations, our algorithms produced solutions with training and test error rates close to those of exact solvers. Even on binary classification problems where highly optimized conventional training methods exist (e.g. SVM-light), our methods are about an order of magnitude faster than conventional training methods on large datasets, while remaining competitive in speed on datasets of medium size. Chun-Nam John Yu, Thorsten Joachims |
KDD | 1 |
| 2007 | Support Vector Training of Protein Alignment Models
Chun-Nam John Yu, Thorsten Joachims, Ron Elber, Jaroslaw Pillardy |
RECOMB | 1 |