Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Douglas B. Moran

dblp:53/1852 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 4 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-authorComputer networks · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 41% Speech recognition and synthesis · 34% Information extraction and text analysis · 17%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Compilers and program optimization · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Haptics and multimodal interaction · 67% User interface design and tools · 20% Collaborative and social computing · 13%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Multimedia systems and quality of experience · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Compilers and program optimization
parsing
0.011994
Interleaving Syntax and Semantics in an Effecient Bottom-Up Parser · ACL 1994
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
spoken language understanding
0.011993
GEMINI: A Natural Language System for Spoken-Language Understanding · ACL 1993
Haptics and multimodal interaction
multimodal interaction
0.011989
Synergistic use of direct manipulation and natural language · CHI 1989
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › semantic representation
logical form
0.011988
Quantifier Scoping in the SRI Core Language Engine · ACL 1988
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › semantic representation › logical form
quantifier scope
0.011988
Quantifier Scoping in the SRI Core Language Engine · ACL 1988
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing
0.011988
Quantifier Scoping in the SRI Core Language Engine · ACL 1988
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › logic in computer science › logical foundations
formal semantics
0.021982
The Representation of Inconsistent Information in a Dynamic Model-Theoretic Semantics · ACL 1982
Presupposition and Implicature in Model-Theoretic Pragmatics · ACL 1981
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling › language model architecture
syntax-aware language models
0.011993
GEMINI: A Natural Language System for Spoken-Language Understanding · ACL 1993
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › inconsistency handling
inconsistency-tolerant reasoning
0.011982
The Representation of Inconsistent Information in a Dynamic Model-Theoretic Semantics · ACL 1982
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › natural language semantics › semantic interpretation
presupposition
0.011981
Presupposition and Implicature in Model-Theoretic Pragmatics · ACL 1981

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sortal constraints · 0.0chart parsing · 0.0unification grammar · 0.0object-oriented design · 0.0multimodal interface design · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1998 Multimodal user interfaces in the Open Agent Architecture
Douglas B. Moran, Adam Cheyer, Luc E. Julia, David L. Martin 0001, Sangkyu Park
Knowl. Based Syst.1
1997 Multimodal User Interfaces in the Open Agent Architecture
abstract
The design and development of the Open Agent Architecture (OAA)l system has focused on providing access to agentbased applications through an intelligent, cooperative, distributed, and multimodal agent-based user interfaces.The current multimodal interface supports a mix of spoken language, handwriting and gesture, and is adaptable to the user's preferences, resources and environment.Only the primary user interface agents need run on the local computer, thereby simplifying the task of using a range of applications from a variety of platforms, especiall y low-powered computers such as Personal Digital Assistants (PDAs).An important consideration in the design of the OAA was to facilitate mix-andmatch: to facilitate the reuse of agents in new and unanticipated applications, and to support rapid prototyping by facilitating the replacement of agents by better versions.The utility of the agents and tools developed as part of this ongoing research project has been demonstrated by their use as infrastructure in unrelated projects.
Douglas B. Moran, Adam Cheyer, Luc E. Julia, David L. Martin 0001, Sangkyu Park
IUI1
1994 Interleaving Syntax and Semantics in an Effecient Bottom-Up Parser
abstract
We describe an efficient bottom-up parser that interleaves syntactic and semantic structure building. Two techniques are presented for reducing search by reducing local ambiguity: Limited left context constraints are used to reduce local syntactic ambiguity, and deferred sortal-constraint application is used to reduce local semantic ambiguity. We experimentally evaluate these techniques, and show dramatic reductions in both number of chart edges and total parsing time. The robust processing capabilities of the parser are demonstrated in its use in improving the accuracy of a speech recognizer.
John Dowding, Robert C. Moore, François Andry, Douglas B. Moran
ACL4
1993 GEMINI: A Natural Language System for Spoken-Language Understanding
abstract
Article Free Access Share on Gemini: a natural language system for spoken-language understanding Authors: John Dowding SRI International, Menlo Park, CA SRI International, Menlo Park, CAView Profile , Jean Mark Gawron SRI International, Menlo Park, CA SRI International, Menlo Park, CAView Profile , Doug Appelt SRI International, Menlo Park, CA SRI International, Menlo Park, CAView Profile , John Bear SRI International, Menlo Park, CA SRI International, Menlo Park, CAView Profile , Lynn Cherny SRI International, Menlo Park, CA SRI International, Menlo Park, CAView Profile , Robert Moore SRI International, Menlo Park, CA SRI International, Menlo Park, CAView Profile , Douglas Moran SRI International, Menlo Park, CA SRI International, Menlo Park, CAView Profile Authors Info & Claims ACL '93: Proceedings of the 31st annual meeting on Association for Computational LinguisticsJune 1993Pages 54–61https://doi.org/10.3115/981574.981582Published:22 June 1993Publication History 43citation1,076DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations43Total Downloads1,076Last 12 Months25Last 6 weeks7 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Publisher SiteeReaderPDF
John Dowding, Jean Mark Gawron, Douglas E. Appelt, John Bear, Lynn Cherny, Robert C. Moore, Douglas B. Moran
ACL7
1990 Spoken language system integration and development
Patti Price, Victor Abrash, Douglas E. Appelt, John Bear, Jared Bernstein, Bridget Bly, John Butzberger, Eric Jackson, Robert C. Moore, Douglas B. Moran, Hy Murveit, Mitch Weintraub
ICSLP11
1989 Synergistic use of direct manipulation and natural language
abstract
This paper shows how the integration of natural language with direct manipulation produces a multimodal interface that overcomes limitations of these techniques when used separately. Natural language helps direct manipulation in being able to specify objects and actions by description, while direct manipulation enables users to learn which objects and actions are available in the system. Furthermore, graphical rendering and manipulation of context provides a partial solution to difficult problems of natural language anaphora.
Phil Cohen 0001, Mary Dalrymple, Douglas B. Moran, Fernando Pereira 0003, Joseph W. Sullivan, Robert A. Gargan Jr., Jon Schlossberg, Sherman W. Tyler
CHI3
1988 Quantifier Scoping in the SRI Core Language Engine
abstract
An algorithm for generating the possible quantitier scopings for a sentence, in order of preference, is outlined. The scoping assigned to a quanttrier is determined by its interactions with other quanttriers, toodais, negation, and certain syntacticconstituent boundaries. When a potential scoping is logically equivalent to another, the less preferred one is discarded.
Douglas B. Moran
ACL1
1986 An architecture for a multimedia teleconferencing system
abstract
We present an object-oriented architecture for a computer-based, real-time, multimedia conferencing system. This architecture divides the system into five functional areas: a multimedia shared workspace, a user interface, conference management, communications, and an information base. The structure and operation of the first four areas are modeled with object-based concepts that address design requirements identified during the development of a proof-of-concept prototype, that preceded the architecture specification.
Lorenzo Aguilar, J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, Douglas B. Moran, Earl Craighill, R. Brungardt
SIGCOMM3
1982 The Representation of Inconsistent Information in a Dynamic Model-Theoretic Semantics
abstract
Model-theoretic semantics provides a computationally attractive means of representing the semantics of natural language. However, the models used in this formalism are static and are usually infinite. Dynamic models are incomplete models that include only the information needed for an application and to which information can be added. Dynamic models are basically approximations of larger conventional models, but differ is several interesting ways.The difference discussed here is the possibility of inconsistent information being included in the model. If a computation causes the model to expand, the result of that computation may be different than the result of performing that same computation with respect to the newly expanded model (i. e. the result is inconsistent with the information currently in the dynamic model). Mechanisms are introduced to eliminate these local (temporary) inconsistencies, but the most natural mechanism can introduce permanent inconsistencies in the information contained in the dynamic model. These inconsistencies are similar to those that people have in their knowledge and beliefs. The mechanism presented is shown to be related to both the intensional isomorphism and impossible worlds approaches to this problem.
Douglas B. Moran
ACL1
1981 Presupposition and Implicature in Model-Theoretic Pragmatics
abstract
No abstract available.
Douglas B. Moran
ACL1