Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Luite Stegeman
dblp:53/4788
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Computational complexity · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining › predictive modeling
classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | On Generating All Optimal Monotone Classifications · ICDM 2011 |
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification › interpretable classification
monotone classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | On Generating All Optimal Monotone Classifications · ICDM 2011 |
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification › multiclass classification
ordinal classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | On Generating All Optimal Monotone Classifications · ICDM 2011 |
Computational complexity › counting complexity
#p-completeness |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | On Generating All Optimal Monotone Classifications · ICDM 2011 |
Computational complexity
counting complexity |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | On Generating All Optimal Monotone Classifications · ICDM 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
uniform sampling · 0.2enumeration · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | On Generating All Optimal Monotone ClassificationsabstractIn many applications of data mining one knows beforehand that the response variable should be monotone (either increasing or decreasing) in the attributes. In ordinal classification, changing the class labels of a data set (relabeling) so that the data becomes monotone, is useful for at least two reasons. Firstly, models trained on relabeled data tend to have better predictive performance than models trained on the original data. Secondly, relabeling is an important building block for the construction of monotone classifiers. However, optimal monotone relabelings are rarely unique, and so far an efficient algorithm to generate them all has been lacking. The main result of this paper is an efficient algorithm to produce the structure of all optimal monotone relabelings. We also show that counting the solutions is #P-complete and give algorithms for efficiently enumerating all solutions, as well as sampling uniformly from the set of solutions. Experiments show that relabeling non-monotone data can improve the predictive performance of models trained on that data. Luite Stegeman, A. J. Feelders |
ICDM | 1 |
| 2007 | A Support Vector Machine Approach to Dutch Part-of-Speech Tagging
Mannes Poel, Luite Stegeman, Rieks op den Akker |
IDA | 2 |