Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Luite Stegeman

dblp:53/4788 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational complexity · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › predictive modeling
classification
0.112011
On Generating All Optimal Monotone Classifications · ICDM 2011
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification › interpretable classification
monotone classification
0.112011
On Generating All Optimal Monotone Classifications · ICDM 2011
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification › multiclass classification
ordinal classification
0.112011
On Generating All Optimal Monotone Classifications · ICDM 2011
Computational complexity › counting complexity
#p-completeness
0.012011
On Generating All Optimal Monotone Classifications · ICDM 2011
Computational complexity
counting complexity
0.012011
On Generating All Optimal Monotone Classifications · ICDM 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

uniform sampling · 0.2enumeration · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 On Generating All Optimal Monotone Classifications
abstract
In many applications of data mining one knows beforehand that the response variable should be monotone (either increasing or decreasing) in the attributes. In ordinal classification, changing the class labels of a data set (relabeling) so that the data becomes monotone, is useful for at least two reasons. Firstly, models trained on relabeled data tend to have better predictive performance than models trained on the original data. Secondly, relabeling is an important building block for the construction of monotone classifiers. However, optimal monotone relabelings are rarely unique, and so far an efficient algorithm to generate them all has been lacking. The main result of this paper is an efficient algorithm to produce the structure of all optimal monotone relabelings. We also show that counting the solutions is #P-complete and give algorithms for efficiently enumerating all solutions, as well as sampling uniformly from the set of solutions. Experiments show that relabeling non-monotone data can improve the predictive performance of models trained on that data.
Luite Stegeman, A. J. Feelders
ICDM1
2007 A Support Vector Machine Approach to Dutch Part-of-Speech Tagging
Mannes Poel, Luite Stegeman, Rieks op den Akker
IDA2